08.03.2014 Views

Brown Cover OP 43 - The Watson Institute for International Studies

Brown Cover OP 43 - The Watson Institute for International Studies

Brown Cover OP 43 - The Watson Institute for International Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a party to a civil war followed by disastrous humanitarian<br />

consequences.<br />

Provision of humanitarian assistance to Abkhazia (Georgia)<br />

probably enhanced that society’s capacity to survive in the<br />

face of a blockade. Assistance perhaps prolonged the conflict<br />

between the Abkhaz insurgents and the government of Georgia.<br />

Yet the sudden collapse of the Abkhaz military position and<br />

consequent haphazard return of Georgians to the homes from<br />

which they were driven might have resulted in a bloodbath.<br />

Indeed, “decisive military victory by one side in an identity civil<br />

war … increases the likelihood of genocide.” 4 Protracting<br />

conflicts because of humanitarian action might not be such a bad<br />

thing. Doing no harm relies on a capacity to identify the harm<br />

being done. That is not an easy task.<br />

<strong>The</strong> impacts of humanitarian action on conflict may occur<br />

during the phase of active hostilities or after violent conflict has<br />

been concluded by victory, a cease-fire, or a broader political<br />

compromise. Moreover, these phases of conflict may overlap.<br />

One region of a country may be in active conflict, while in another<br />

the conflict may be over. Thus, the phases are not rigorously<br />

separated out in the thematic account of the conflict connection<br />

that follows.<br />

This chapter examines the extent to which humanitarian<br />

assistance and protection feed the conflicts to which they respond.<br />

Humanitarian Assistance and<br />

the Political Economy of War<br />

<strong>The</strong> core of the logic of aid fueling conflict concerns the effect<br />

of humanitarian action on the political economy of war, a topic<br />

that has been examined closely in recent years by analysts and<br />

pondered by practitioners. <strong>The</strong>re is a tendency to assume that<br />

going to war constitutes a suspension or abandonment of<br />

rational economic behavior. But although wars damage or<br />

destroy economies, they also create them. 5<br />

War may serve concrete economic functions <strong>for</strong> particular<br />

groups. 6 Transport contractors benefit substantially from the<br />

business created by humanitarian agencies. Criminal groups<br />

take advantage of the lack of state control to produce and<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!