Protector or predator? - Institute for Security Studies
Protector or predator? - Institute for Security Studies
Protector or predator? - Institute for Security Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Protect<strong>or</strong></strong> <strong>or</strong> predat<strong>or</strong>?<br />
appears far from attaining the public trust and supp<strong>or</strong>t it seeks and badly needs.<br />
But this can be attained if the right action is taken.<br />
Promoting police integrity has to start from the top. Police commanders at<br />
every level should be held accountable f<strong>or</strong> adhering to clear standards of conduct<br />
and responsibility. All commanders should consistently highlight, and in their<br />
behaviour reflect, the c<strong>or</strong>e values of the SAPS, including integrity; respect f<strong>or</strong> the<br />
law; and service excellence, and they must regularly articulate what they expect<br />
from those under their command. If commanders come across as arrogant, impolite,<br />
defensive, secretive <strong>or</strong> uncaring, they cannot expect their members to act<br />
any differently towards the public. If the police hold these attitudes, the public<br />
will generally see the police in a negative light. They will tend to not rep<strong>or</strong>t incidents<br />
of misconduct <strong>or</strong> c<strong>or</strong>ruption, as they will not believe that their complaints<br />
will be accepted and properly dealt with. Similarly, if lower level and frontline<br />
commanders know that they are m<strong>or</strong>e likely to be blamed than supp<strong>or</strong>ted by<br />
their seni<strong>or</strong> commanders, they may rather turn a blind eye to unacceptable behaviour<br />
<strong>or</strong> go as far as covering it up.<br />
At a high level, it is theref<strong>or</strong>e recommended that:<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
The Minister and National Commissioner of the SAPS continue to highlight<br />
the combating of police c<strong>or</strong>ruption as a national level pri<strong>or</strong>ity and seni<strong>or</strong> officials<br />
should speak out against and proactively act against c<strong>or</strong>rupt behaviour.<br />
Greater attention must be given to improving the systems f<strong>or</strong> promoting<br />
police officials, and retaining expertise where it is most needed by raising<br />
salaries in cases where promotion is not an option.<br />
The SAPS internal disciplinary system must be reviewed and substantially<br />
improved so that it can have a real impact on police misconduct at a station<br />
level. This must be publicly rep<strong>or</strong>ted in the SAPS Annual Rep<strong>or</strong>ts.<br />
Hardw<strong>or</strong>king and honest police officials who are willing to speak out against<br />
and investigate colleagues who are either suspected of, <strong>or</strong> known to be undermining<br />
the police service through c<strong>or</strong>rupt activities, should be f<strong>or</strong>mally<br />
recognised when it comes to career advancement, transfer requests and other<br />
career progression opp<strong>or</strong>tunities.<br />
In addition to improving and, m<strong>or</strong>e imp<strong>or</strong>tantly, implementing, the Anti-<br />
C<strong>or</strong>ruption Strategy, we recommend that specific attention be given to the following<br />
areas:<br />
50<br />
<strong>Institute</strong> f<strong>or</strong> <strong>Security</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>