2013 Annual Report - Jesus College - University of Cambridge
2013 Annual Report - Jesus College - University of Cambridge
2013 Annual Report - Jesus College - University of Cambridge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ANTHROPOLOGY I <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2013</strong> 17<br />
There was the group, certainly, but also the<br />
sociologists who had infiltrated, and the<br />
media which got hold <strong>of</strong> the story and<br />
accelerated the rhythm <strong>of</strong> events to a crisis.<br />
Rather than being “mental” events, produced<br />
in the heads <strong>of</strong> the group members, they were<br />
‘social’ events prompted by interactions<br />
between different groups with different<br />
beliefs and aims.<br />
Perhaps the most significant interaction<br />
was between the interests and ideas which<br />
motivated the group around the medium and<br />
the focus <strong>of</strong> the investigation introduced by<br />
the social scientists who entered the group.<br />
This interaction could be described as a<br />
misunderstanding between a concern with<br />
“prophecy” on the part <strong>of</strong> one party, and<br />
“prediction” on the part <strong>of</strong> the other. The<br />
social scientists took the notion <strong>of</strong> prophecy<br />
to be a prediction – in this case a prediction<br />
concerning a future event, a world disaster<br />
and the arrival <strong>of</strong> flying saucers.<br />
This view, however, misses what<br />
concerned the group’s medium, who was<br />
more interested in the disappearance <strong>of</strong><br />
previously secure forms <strong>of</strong> measurement<br />
which hitherto had allowed prediction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
future. The forms which had become<br />
(temporarily) uncertain were clear from her<br />
messages and concerned a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
scientific discoveries and technical<br />
inventions. In essence, the messages<br />
concerned space travel (still technically in the<br />
future), involving transformed concepts <strong>of</strong><br />
distance; continental drift, involving<br />
disturbed certainties about place; and nuclear<br />
warfare, involving the dissolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> the defensible self in what<br />
came to be called ‘mutually assured<br />
destruction’.<br />
The medium was therefore working in an<br />
environment in which the parameters <strong>of</strong><br />
distance, place and the bounded self had<br />
become uncertain; where the notion <strong>of</strong><br />
prediction – which assumes stable and<br />
unquestioned categories <strong>of</strong> measurement –<br />
ceased to operate. The medium glimpsed<br />
what we might call a new world condition,<br />
with new threats and new possibilities <strong>of</strong><br />
participation. She articulated, moreover, an<br />
account <strong>of</strong> these threats and possibilities in<br />
the language available to her, <strong>of</strong>fering an<br />
version that made sense to her group.<br />
Indeed, what she had to say was sufficiently<br />
well understood to make sense to the media,<br />
as well as to the social scientists, who could<br />
work with spirit messages from outer space<br />
as if they were perfectly familiar with such<br />
notions. The medium was dealing not with<br />
the future but the present, improvising a<br />
series<strong>of</strong> solutions, drawing on elements<br />
available from what is known as the<br />
American tradition <strong>of</strong> ‘Metaphysical’ religion<br />
– a mix <strong>of</strong> Christian, occult, philosophical