21.03.2014 Views

Optical Coatings

Optical Coatings

Optical Coatings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fundamental Optics<br />

Material Properties <strong>Optical</strong> Specifications Gaussian Beam Optics<br />

Suppose instead that we decide to reduce the divergence<br />

by directing the laser into a beam expander (reversed telescope)<br />

of angular magnification m = 10, such as Melles Griot model<br />

09 LBM 013 (figure 2.3). Consider the case in which the expander<br />

is focused to form a waist of radius w 0 = 4.0 mm at the expander<br />

output lens. Since v ∝ 1/w 0 , by definition, v is reduced by a factor<br />

of 10; therefore, for z = 100 m,<br />

For the expanded beam, the ratio w(z)/w 0 is only a factor of 12.6<br />

for a distance of 100 m, but it is a factor of 126 for the same distance<br />

when the laser is used alone.<br />

OPTIMUM COLLIMATION<br />

Typically, one has a fixed value for w 0 and uses the previously given<br />

expression to calculate w(z) for an input value of z. However, one can<br />

also utilize this equation to see how final beam radius varies with starting<br />

beam radius at a fixed distance, z. Figure 2.4 shows the Gaussian<br />

beam propagation equation plotted as a function of w 0 , with the<br />

particular values of l = 632.8 nm and z = 100 m.<br />

The beam radius at 100 m reaches a minimum value for a starting<br />

beam radius of about 4.5 mm. Therefore, if we wanted to achieve<br />

the best combination of minimum beam diameter and minimum<br />

beam spread (or best collimation) over a distance of 100 m, our<br />

optimum starting beam radius would be 4.5 mm. Any other starting<br />

value would result in a larger beam at z = 100 m.<br />

We can find the general expression for the optimum starting<br />

beam radius for a given distance, z. Doing so yields<br />

w (optimum) =<br />

0<br />

5 5 4<br />

w(z) = (10 )( 504 . × 10 )<br />

= 5.04 mm.<br />

10<br />

1/2<br />

⎛ lz<br />

⎞<br />

⎜<br />

⎝ p<br />

⎟ . (2.6)<br />

⎠<br />

Using this optimum value of w 0 will provide the best combination<br />

of minimum starting beam diameter and minimum beam<br />

spread (ratio of w(z)/w 0 ) over the distance z. The previous example<br />

of z = 100 and l=632.8 nm gives w 0 (optimum) = 4.48 mm, shown<br />

graphically in figure 2.4. If we put this value for w 0 (optimum) back<br />

into the expression for w(z), w(z) = √}}2 w 0 . Thus, for this example,<br />

w(100) = √}}2 (4.48) = 6.3 mm.<br />

By turning this previous equation around, we can define a<br />

distance, called the Rayleigh range (z R ), over which the beam radius<br />

spreads by a factor of √}}2 as<br />

z R =<br />

with<br />

If we use beam-expanding optics (such as the 09 LBC, 09 LBX,<br />

09 LBZ, or 09 LCM series), which allow us to adjust the position<br />

of the beam waist, we can actually double the distance over which<br />

beam divergence is minimized. Figure 2.5 illustrates this situation,<br />

in which the beam starts off at a value of w(z R ) = (2lz/p) 1/2 , goes<br />

through a minimum value of w 0 = w(z R )/√}}2 , and then returns to<br />

w(z R ). By focusing the beam-expanding optics to place the beam<br />

waist at the midpoint, we can restrict beam spread to a factor of √}}2<br />

over a distance of 2z R , as opposed to just z R .<br />

This result can now be used in the problem of finding the starting<br />

beam radius that yields the minimum beam diameter and beam<br />

spread over 100 m. Using 2z R = 100, or z R = 50, and l = 632.8 nm,<br />

we get a value of w(z R ) = (2lz/p) 1/2 = 4.5 mm, and w 0 = 3.2 mm.<br />

Thus, the optimum starting beam radius is the same as previously<br />

calculated. However, by focusing the expander we achieve a final<br />

beam radius that is no larger than our starting beam radius, while<br />

still maintaining the √}}2 factor in overall variation.<br />

Alternately, if we started off with a beam radius of 6.3 mm<br />

(√}}2w 0 ), we could focus the expander to provide a beam waist of<br />

w 0 = 4.5 mm at 100 m, and a final beam radius of 6.3 mm at 200 m.<br />

FINAL BEAM RADIUS (mm)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

pw<br />

l<br />

2<br />

0<br />

w(z ) = 2w<br />

.<br />

R 0<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

STARTING BEAM RADIUS w 0 (mm)<br />

(2.7)<br />

<strong>Optical</strong> <strong>Coatings</strong><br />

Figure 2.3<br />

telescope)<br />

Laser beam expander 09 LBM 013 (reversed<br />

Figure 2.4 Beam radius at 100 m as a function of starting<br />

beam radius for a HeNe laser at 632.8 nm<br />

2.4 1 Visit Us OnLine! www.mellesgriot.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!