- Page 1 and 2: Williams Creek Watershed Assessment
- Page 3 and 4: Abstract This document is the Willi
- Page 5 and 6: Hydrology and Water Use . . . . . .
- Page 7 and 8: List of Tables Table 1: Forest land
- Page 9 and 10: List of Figures Figure 1: Williams
- Page 11 and 12: • Water Quality Summer water temp
- Page 13 and 14: Williams Creek Watershed Council Th
- Page 15 and 16: Agencies and Jurisdictions Agencies
- Page 17 and 18: data to determine if these standard
- Page 19 and 20: Legislation and Management Plans Th
- Page 21 and 22: Figure 1: Williams Creek Watershed,
- Page 23 and 24: 3 1 2 1. Pennington Creek 2. Lower
- Page 25 and 26: Land Use Land use in the Williams C
- Page 27: Williams Creek Land Use Zoning N W
- Page 31 and 32: the winter season. The TSZ is subje
- Page 33 and 34: that drain to the East Fork of Will
- Page 35 and 36: Botanical Resource Areas To protect
- Page 37 and 38: About 153 million years ago, the ol
- Page 39 and 40: Appendix A: Williams Creek Watershe
- Page 41 and 42: Appendix B: Williams Creek Watershe
- Page 43 and 44: Appendix F: Williams Creek Watershe
- Page 45 and 46: Appendix F: Williams Creek Watershe
- Page 47 and 48: OWRD. 1985. Rogue River Basin Study
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 8: Native People of the Appl
- Page 51 and 52: the gold amalgamates, which was the
- Page 53 and 54: today. Longtime Williams residents
- Page 55 and 56: Figure 10: Oxen Hauling Logs to the
- Page 57 and 58: The Applegate River and its tributa
- Page 59 and 60: conditions. This has created a shif
- Page 61 and 62: Appendix A: Historical Conditions b
- Page 63 and 64: Appendix B: Historical Timeline ~22
- Page 65 and 66: ODFW. 1999. Estimates of Adult Coho
- Page 67 and 68: RESULTS Williams Creek and its trib
- Page 69 and 70: MC: Moderate Gradient Confined Chan
- Page 71 and 72: DISCUSSION Figure 11: Percentages o
- Page 73 and 74: Channel sensitivity, distribution o
- Page 75 and 76: Appendix B: Channel Habitat Types w
- Page 77 and 78: HYDROLOGY AND WATER USE INTRODUCTIO
- Page 79 and 80:
Stream Flow The data for this secti
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 6: Elevation and precipitatio
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 13: Precipitation Isohyetals
- Page 85 and 86:
hydrology is dominated by three fac
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 16: Stream flows (cfs) near
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 19: Monthly water availabili
- Page 91 and 92:
Groundwater Large quantities of gro
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 10: Water rights summary for
- Page 95 and 96:
DISCUSSION The pattern of precipita
- Page 97 and 98:
Appendix A: Geology of the Williams
- Page 99 and 100:
WATER QUALITY INTRODUCTION Water qu
- Page 101 and 102:
levels of dissolved oxygen. The Ore
- Page 103 and 104:
METHODS All of the data presented i
- Page 105 and 106:
mainstem of Williams Creek exceeded
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 25: Continuous daily tempera
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 29: Continuous daily tempera
- Page 111 and 112:
pH, Dissolved Oxygen, Alkalinity, C
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 19: Levels of nitrate. The cr
- Page 115 and 116:
Site Date Storm? Turbidity Williams
- Page 117 and 118:
aquatic weeds and algae. Algae can
- Page 119 and 120:
References ARWC. 2000. Draft Propos
- Page 121 and 122:
devegetation, road building, or oth
- Page 123 and 124:
5. The BLM Mining Claim Microfiche
- Page 125 and 126:
plugged or undersized culverts caus
- Page 127 and 128:
Private timber companies who have h
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 26: Signed Private and Public
- Page 131 and 132:
Review of the Josephine County Geol
- Page 133 and 134:
absence of any plan of operations.
- Page 135 and 136:
Similarly, in the West Fork subwate
- Page 137 and 138:
Appendix A: Soils of the Williams C
- Page 139 and 140:
Appendix B: Williams Creek Watershe
- Page 141 and 142:
ODFa. 1998. Progress on Landslide S
- Page 143 and 144:
debris, and stream shade percentage
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 30: Observation data for the
- Page 147 and 148:
was not analyzed for this assessmen
- Page 149 and 150:
of Rock Creek, Pipe Fork, Munger Cr
- Page 151 and 152:
References ARWC. 1994. Applegate Wa
- Page 153 and 154:
The Williams Valley is now criss-cr
- Page 155 and 156:
RESULTS Locations of Wetlands in th
- Page 157 and 158:
The Classification of Wetlands and
- Page 159 and 160:
References BLM. 2000. Medford Distr
- Page 161 and 162:
METHODS Data on the location, timin
- Page 163 and 164:
As recently as 1973, in-stream grav
- Page 165 and 166:
100-year floodplain in the Williams
- Page 167 and 168:
Williams Creek and have potential c
- Page 169 and 170:
Table 37: Channel Habitat Types wit
- Page 171 and 172:
Appendix A: Approximate Locations o
- Page 173 and 174:
Appendix B: Channel Modifications (
- Page 175 and 176:
Appendix B: Channel Modifications (
- Page 177 and 178:
FISH AND FISH HABITAT INTRODUCTION
- Page 179 and 180:
spawn after only two summers in the
- Page 181 and 182:
spawning runs into small tributarie
- Page 183 and 184:
Fluvial cutthroat migrate between t
- Page 185 and 186:
Bill Creek > Right Hand Fork > West
- Page 187 and 188:
• 1994 ODFW Stream Survey The vol
- Page 189 and 190:
Fish Populations: Stream surveyors
- Page 191 and 192:
• Cutthroat Trout Electrofishing
- Page 193 and 194:
ODFW found trout (probably offsprin
- Page 195 and 196:
Tree Branch Creek > Lone Creek > We
- Page 197 and 198:
Instream Habitat, Valley Morphology
- Page 199 and 200:
Table 53: Chinook Salmon Spawning S
- Page 201 and 202:
Maximum Stream Temperatures: Table
- Page 203 and 204:
69 pools with a maximum depth of 1.
- Page 205 and 206:
DISCUSSION Life Cycle Factors To di
- Page 207 and 208:
spawning tributaries. Drought condi
- Page 209 and 210:
function in the Williams Creek Wate
- Page 211 and 212:
A substantial beaver colony was fou
- Page 213 and 214:
Appendix B: Approximate Coho Distri
- Page 215 and 216:
Appendix D: Approximate Summer Stee
- Page 217 and 218:
Appendix F: Fish Barriers in the Wi
- Page 219 and 220:
Appendix G: Stream Surveys, Riparia
- Page 221 and 222:
References Anonymous. n.d. Abbrevia
- Page 223 and 224:
Frissell, C.A., W.J. Liss, R.E. Gre
- Page 225 and 226:
ODFW. 1995. Williams Creek Stream R
- Page 227 and 228:
Data Gaps: • Incomplete records o
- Page 229 and 230:
Water diversions also directly affe
- Page 231 and 232:
with storm events. Turbidity was ge
- Page 233 and 234:
mines, slope instability not relate
- Page 235 and 236:
• Provide incentives for property
- Page 237 and 238:
long-term impact of confining the c
- Page 239 and 240:
• Quantify the 1997 flood effects
- Page 241 and 242:
hydric soils: Saturated soils that