08.04.2014 Views

regional studies public administration - Facultatea de Drept ...

regional studies public administration - Facultatea de Drept ...

regional studies public administration - Facultatea de Drept ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION & REGIONAL STUDIES<br />

2nd Year, No. 1 – 2009<br />

Galati University Press, ISSN 2065 -1759<br />

3. Hypothesis<br />

The main hypothesis of the study is that traditional exploitation of<br />

timber by rural populations in a community framework is more likely to<br />

yield higher financial revenues directly perceived by them compared to<br />

classical industrial exploitation.<br />

4. Methodology<br />

To reach our objectives, we inten<strong>de</strong>d to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the causal links that<br />

could exist between traditional exploitation of community forests and the<br />

level of economic welfare of the local population.<br />

To do this, we elaborated a questionnaire that was administered<br />

to 200 households of three villages of the Lomié region of the East Province<br />

of Cameroon. The exploitation of the responses led to the construction of a<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l which reveals among others the preference of the local populations<br />

for community forestry.<br />

A factorial analysis of multiple correspon<strong>de</strong>nces was done using<br />

the SPAD 4.0 software to <strong>de</strong>termine the most discriminating variables that<br />

bring pertinent information to the mo<strong>de</strong>l. Those variables are shown in<br />

Table 1. (See table 1).<br />

After that, using the test of the comparison of means, we<br />

investigated whether revenues received by agents during the phase of<br />

exploitation of the community forest and their social expenses (health,<br />

education, nutrition) were significantly different from those received<br />

before. The test carried out was the following:<br />

- Null hypothesis (H o ) : mean (variable 1 – variable 2) = 0 against<br />

- Alternative hypothesis (H a ) : mean (variable 1 – variable 2) < 0,<br />

where «variable 1» and «variable 2» represent the studied variable<br />

respectively before and after the beginning of the exploitation of the<br />

community forest. The data was analysed using Stata 8.0 software.<br />

5. Results<br />

The analysis consisted in comparing the amount of revenue<br />

generated by the different activities performed by the populations before<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!