21.04.2014 Views

Qhafor Ameen Hamasur

Qhafor Ameen Hamasur

Qhafor Ameen Hamasur

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table (5-7) The calculation of the weighted joint density (wJd) from registration<br />

of jointing in the borehole no.3 – unit no.2 (carbonate rocks)………..94<br />

Table (5-8) Calculation of the RQD, Vb & Db (average spacing) in the<br />

boreholes no.1, 2 & 3 for the units 2, 6 & 2 respectively…………......95<br />

Table (5-9) Geometric correcting factor (CF), adjusting factor for joint orientation<br />

(R STA ) for each of gravity and fill dams. Apparent dip angle, dam axis<br />

orientation and horizontal distance of the proposed dam profiles.…...97<br />

Table (5-10) Rock mass characterization in the surface section no.1…………….98<br />

Table (5-11) Rock mass characterization in the surface section no.2…………….99<br />

Table (5-12) Rock mass characterization in the surface section no.3……………100<br />

Table (5-13) Rock mass characterization of blocky carbonate rocks<br />

In the boreholes no.1, 2 & 3…………………………………………....101<br />

Table (5-14) Rock mass characterization and Geological Strength Index<br />

(GSI) of Flysch rocks in the borehole no.1…………………………....102<br />

Table (5-15) Rock mass characterization and Geological Strength Index<br />

(GSI) of Flysch rocks in the borehole no.2…………………………....103<br />

Table (5-16) Rock mass characterization and Geological Strength Index<br />

(GSI) of Flysch rocks in the borehole no.3…………………………….104<br />

Table (5-17) Structure Rating and Surface Condition Rating of discontinuities<br />

for determination of GSI of blocky carbonate rock masses in<br />

the study area………………………………………………………......106<br />

Table (5-18) GSI determination for blocky carbonate rock masses in the<br />

surface sections (Sinjar Formation) and boreholes (Kolosh<br />

Formation) from the modified chart of this study……………………107<br />

Table (5-19) Correlation among calculated GSI values plotted on this study<br />

chart, on Hoek-chart and on Sonmez&Ulusay-chart for blocky<br />

carbonate rock masses in the surface sections (Sinjar<br />

Formation) and boreholes (Kolosh Formation)……………………...108<br />

Table (5-20) Rating of each rock mass parameters and values of the rock<br />

mass classification systems in the surface section no.1……………109<br />

Table (5-21) Rating of each rock mass parameters and values of the rock<br />

mass classification systems in the surface section no.2……………110<br />

Table (5-22) Rating of each rock mass parameters and values of the rock<br />

mass classification systems in the surface section no.3……………111<br />

Table (5-23) Rating of each rock mass parameters and values of the rock<br />

mass classification systems of the blocky carbonate rocks in<br />

the boreholes no.1, 2 7 3…………………………………………………112<br />

Table (5-24) GSI determination for surface section no.1-unit no.1(S1-U1)<br />

of Molasse Gercus Formation…………………………………………...113<br />

Table (5-25) GSI determination for borehole units of Flysch Kolosh Formation……114<br />

Table (5-26) Rating of rock mass parameters (Groundwater, strike and dip<br />

orientation and R STA ) and values of the rock mass classification<br />

systems of Flysch rocks in the borehole no.1…………………………..115<br />

Table (5-27) Rating of rock mass parameters (Groundwater, strike and dip<br />

orientation and R STA ) and values of the rock mass classification<br />

systems of Flysch rocks in the borehole no.2………………….……….116<br />

Table (5-28) Rating of rock mass parameters (Groundwater, strike and dip<br />

orientation and R STA ) and values of the rock mass classification<br />

systems of Flysch rocks in the borehole no.3…………………….…….117<br />

VIII

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!