D2 3 Computing e-Infrastructure cost calculations and business _models_vam1-final
D2 3 Computing e-Infrastructure cost calculations and business _models_vam1-final
D2 3 Computing e-Infrastructure cost calculations and business _models_vam1-final
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e-‐FISCAL: www.efiscal.eu <br />
EC Contract Number: 283449 <br />
(a) HS06 for M3 Double XL – Intel <br />
(b) Resource subscription impact <br />
HS06 Score HS06 Score<br />
160 <br />
140 <br />
120 <br />
100 <br />
80 <br />
60 <br />
40 <br />
20 <br />
0 <br />
160 <br />
140 <br />
120 <br />
100 <br />
80 <br />
60 <br />
40 <br />
20 <br />
0 <br />
Bare Metal 1 + 3 VMs <br />
Bare Metal 1 + 3 VMs <br />
HTC <br />
EC2 <br />
4 HS06 <br />
HTC <br />
EC2 <br />
4 HS06 <br />
160 <br />
140 <br />
120 <br />
100 <br />
80 <br />
60 <br />
40 <br />
20 <br />
0 <br />
160 <br />
140 <br />
120 <br />
100 <br />
80 <br />
60 <br />
40 <br />
20 <br />
0 <br />
No Oversubscripqon <br />
Increased Subscripqon <br />
Overcomitment <br />
Bare Metal 1 + 3 VMs 4 HS)6 <br />
No Oversubscripqon <br />
Increased Subscripqon <br />
Overcomitment <br />
Bare Metal 1 + 3 VMs 4 HS)6 <br />
HTC Number of VMs = 4 <br />
HTC Number of VMs = 4 <br />
The above graph (a) demonstrates the HEPSEPC06 scores comparison for the EC2 M3 Double Extra Large instances <br />
<strong>and</strong> corresponding in-‐house HTC instances at INFN with the Intel processors. From the graphs following <br />
observations could be made (in addition to what has already been discussed): <br />
• 37.79% average performance loss (ranging from 8.81-‐54.98%) while comparing the HEPSEPC06 scores <br />
between M3 Double Extra-‐Large EC2 <strong>and</strong> corresponding in-‐house HTC instances at INFN. <br />
In addition, (b) displays the HEPSPEC score trends with the increasing level of resource subscription <strong>and</strong> over-subscription.<br />
In the bare-‐metal case there is no memory over-‐subscription, as memory is solely utilized by one <br />
instance. In the second case, memory resource is shared amongst 4 VMs, where only one is running the <br />
HEPSPEC06 benchmark <strong>and</strong> rest of the three virtual machines are idle. We can see that there is no significant <br />
effect of increasing the memory subscription as long as it stays below the available memory size. The third case <br />
where all four virtual machines are running HEPSEPC06 <strong>and</strong> memory is stressed across the physical machine, it is <br />
clear that oversubscription of only the memory resource decreases the HEPSEPC06 score (thus increases the <br />
performance loss). Although more detailed test case is required to fully underst<strong>and</strong> the effect of resource <br />
oversubscription. <br />
e-‐FISCAL : Financial Study for Sustainable <strong>Computing</strong> e-‐<strong>Infrastructure</strong>s <br />
Deliverable <strong>D2</strong>.3 – <strong>Computing</strong> e-‐<strong>Infrastructure</strong>s <strong>cost</strong> estimation <strong>and</strong> analysis – Pricing <strong>and</strong> <br />
Business <strong>models</strong> <br />
101