24.04.2014 Views

D2 3 Computing e-Infrastructure cost calculations and business _models_vam1-final

D2 3 Computing e-Infrastructure cost calculations and business _models_vam1-final

D2 3 Computing e-Infrastructure cost calculations and business _models_vam1-final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e-­‐FISCAL: www.efiscal.eu <br />

EC Contract Number: 283449 <br />

From the analysis in Graph 13, the <strong>cost</strong> per core/hour compared to the Amazon adjusted prices for St<strong>and</strong>ard <br />

M/L/XL instances – Linux is as follows: <br />

The <strong>cost</strong> per core hour of e-­‐FISCAL median becomes less expensive when the e-­‐<strong>Infrastructure</strong> operates: <br />

• At 30% utilisation rate or more compared to on dem<strong>and</strong> instances. <br />

• At 40% utilisation rate or more compared to 1-­‐year reserved instances utilised at 60%. <br />

• At approx. 50% utilisation rate or more compared to 1-­‐year reserved instances utilised at 80%. <br />

• At approx. 65% utilisation rate or more compared to 3-­‐year reserved instances utilised at 60%. <br />

• At approx. 75% utilisation rate or more compared to 3-­‐year reserved instances utilised at 80%. <br />

The <strong>cost</strong> per core hour of e-­‐FISCAL average becomes less expensive when the e-­‐<strong>Infrastructure</strong> operates: <br />

• At approx. 60% rate or more compared to on dem<strong>and</strong> instances. <br />

• At 80% utilisation rate or more compared to 1-­‐year reserved instances utilized at 60%. <br />

• At approx. 95% utilisation rate or more compared to 1-­‐year reserved instances utilized at 80%. <br />

• The <strong>cost</strong> per core hour of e-­‐FISCAL average is more than the performance adjusted price for 3-­‐year <br />

reserved instances in 60% <strong>and</strong> 80% usage rates. <br />

Cluster Compute Quadruple XL-­‐ LINUX -­‐ 43% <br />

DEGRADATION <br />

0.500 <br />

0.450 <br />

0.400 <br />

0.350 <br />

0.300 <br />

0.250 <br />

0.200 <br />

0.150 <br />

0.100 <br />

0.050 <br />

0.000 <br />

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% <br />

On dem<strong>and</strong> instances 0.174 0.174 0.174 0.174 0.174 0.174 0.174 0.174 0.174 0.174 <br />

1year reserved -­‐60% 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143 <br />

1year reserved -­‐80% 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 0.117 <br />

e-­‐FISCAL all median 0.237 0.119 0.079 0.059 0.047 0.040 0.034 0.030 0.026 0.024 <br />

e-­‐FISCAL all average 0.475 0.237 0.158 0.119 0.095 0.079 0.068 0.059 0.053 0.047 <br />

Graph 14: Identification of the Indifference point between e-FISCAL <strong>cost</strong> <strong>and</strong> Amazon adjusted for<br />

performance prices (Cluster Compute Quadruple XL instances – Linux)<br />

From the analysis in Graph 14, the <strong>cost</strong> per core/hour compared to the Amazon adjusted prices for Cluster <br />

Compute Quadruple XL instances – Linux is as follows: <br />

The <strong>cost</strong> per core hour of e-­‐FISCAL median becomes less expensive when the e-­‐<strong>Infrastructure</strong> operates: <br />

e-­‐FISCAL : Financial Study for Sustainable <strong>Computing</strong> e-­‐<strong>Infrastructure</strong>s <br />

Deliverable <strong>D2</strong>.3 – <strong>Computing</strong> e-­‐<strong>Infrastructure</strong>s <strong>cost</strong> estimation <strong>and</strong> analysis – Pricing <strong>and</strong> <br />

Business <strong>models</strong> <br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!