WEF_GrowAfrica_AnnualReport2014
WEF_GrowAfrica_AnnualReport2014
WEF_GrowAfrica_AnnualReport2014
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2013 in Review 2013 in Review<br />
2013 action for transformation<br />
SPOTLIGHT<br />
E-Wallet vouchers – Subsidy overhaul eliminates<br />
graft in input distribution and boosts food security<br />
Leadership and alignment<br />
Infrastructure and policy<br />
•¡<br />
Strong support and leadership from the<br />
Honourable Minister of Agriculture and<br />
Rural Development.<br />
•¡<br />
A multi-stakeholder “Champions Group” is<br />
being established.<br />
Strategy setting<br />
•¡<br />
The ATA provides strong strategic and<br />
operational direction, including defining<br />
priority value chains and launching Staple<br />
Crop Processing Zones.<br />
•¡<br />
A CAADP Investment Plan is in place.<br />
Investment pipeline<br />
•¡<br />
A FMARD Agribusiness and Investment<br />
Unit (AIU) has been established to promote<br />
and facilitate sectoral investment.<br />
•¡<br />
Government leadership has stimulated<br />
domestic and international interest to<br />
inherent Nigerian market opportunities.<br />
•¡<br />
Value-chain partnerships are developing<br />
broadly, including an influx of rice millers.<br />
•¡<br />
There are currently not enough commercial<br />
growers of high-quality cassava to<br />
adequately support cassava flour milling.<br />
Risk mitigation and financing<br />
•¡<br />
Minimal government provision of<br />
infrastructure means many companies must<br />
finance their on-farm infrastructure and<br />
power generators.<br />
•¡<br />
Lack of standardised government<br />
procedures can add costs to doing<br />
business, for example, Customs or the<br />
National Agency for Food and Drug<br />
Administration and Control (NAFDAC)<br />
are not fully aligned with FMARD. More<br />
generally, permit granting can be slow and<br />
exposed to corruption.<br />
•¡<br />
Price volatility and an uneven playing field<br />
are caused by smuggling and by import<br />
waivers for select producers.<br />
Delivery and implementation<br />
•¡<br />
FMARD and the AIU demonstrate strong<br />
capacity for coordination and delivery of<br />
initiatives and reforms.<br />
•¡<br />
No functional inter-ministerial group<br />
exists to coordinate agribusiness enabling<br />
environment improvements, and there<br />
appears to be limited communication<br />
between ministries and agencies.<br />
•¡<br />
Demand exceeds government capacity to<br />
facilitate investments and provide linkages<br />
to partners or financing. In some cases, this<br />
raises possibility of scaling down planned<br />
investment.<br />
Since 1967, the Government of Nigeria has had a<br />
policy intended to deliver subsidised inputs, particularly<br />
fertiliser, to help farmers improve crop yields. Under the<br />
longstanding programme, the Federal Government was<br />
the sole procurer of fertiliser, which it then re-sold at<br />
subsidised prices to distributors for delivery through a<br />
complex chain for eventual sale to farmers from Wardlevel<br />
warehouses. Farmers expected to be charged a<br />
fixed and heavily-subsidised price, despite significant<br />
differences in handling costs and market forces across<br />
the country.<br />
However, the subsidy policy suffered from multiple<br />
problems, including wide-scale corruption and<br />
inefficiencies. A massive diversion of supply benefitted<br />
middlemen and rent-seekers, while some fertiliser<br />
was smuggled to neighbouring countries. The lengthy<br />
and cumbersome bureaucratic tendering process<br />
often caused late delivery of inputs, and despite the<br />
considerable fiscal burden to the government, the<br />
impact on agricultural productivity was mixed at best.<br />
Between 1980 and 2010, over $5.4 billion was spent<br />
on fertiliser subsidies but no more than 11% of farmers<br />
received these fertilisers, so that over $4.8 billion<br />
was estimated as lost to corruption. Furthermore,<br />
the system displaced the private sector in the inputs<br />
distribution value chain.<br />
In 2012, the Growth Enhancement Support (GES)<br />
programme began shifting to an industry system that<br />
incorporates private agro-dealers as the purchasers of<br />
fertiliser (and seed) from established fertiliser suppliers<br />
(rather than the government), giving them responsibility<br />
for distribution of the inputs at agreed-upon centres<br />
in local communities. This afforded millions of farmers<br />
access to the subsidised fertiliser for the first time. The<br />
GES “e-Wallet” system also promotes the utilisation of<br />
mobile technology to send farmers vouchers that they<br />
can redeem at distribution centres.<br />
Small-scale farmers with less than 3 ha of land are<br />
entitled to a 50% subsidy on two bags of highquality<br />
fertiliser. In 2012, during the first year of the<br />
programme, 1.2 million smallholders were reached. In<br />
2013, 4.5 million farmers redeemed their “e-Wallet”<br />
voucher, with the goal being to reach 20 million farmers<br />
by 2015.<br />
In the initial two years of the programme 750,000<br />
tonnes of fertiliser has been delivered to farmers,<br />
along with 55,000 tonnes of improved seeds. The use<br />
of these inputs has resulted in 15.5 million tonnes of<br />
food being produced, such that FMARD credits the<br />
programme with also providing improved food security<br />
to 30 million persons in farming households.<br />
Additionally, over 800 agro-dealers and 25 fertiliser and<br />
seed suppliers are registered with the programme and<br />
operational. 2012 also saw $192 million of privatesector<br />
financing commitments leveraged, aided by<br />
guarantees from the Central Bank to commercial<br />
banks that allow them to reduce the risk of lending to<br />
the fertiliser and seed companies (under the NIRSAL<br />
initiative).<br />
•¡<br />
Several different financing initiatives<br />
and instruments have been initiated but<br />
implementation and uptake is still in the<br />
very early stages<br />
•¡<br />
NIRSAL is helping, but beyond NIRSAL<br />
there are few financing options for large<br />
commercial agribusinesses.<br />
•¡<br />
SCPZ company designation is at times<br />
slow.<br />
•¡<br />
Companies report that state governments<br />
are sometimes easier to work with than the<br />
national government.<br />
•¡<br />
NIRSAL and FAFIN are not seen as<br />
adequate substitutes for planned shutdown<br />
of the Commercial Agricultural Credit<br />
Scheme when it expires in 2016.<br />
•¡<br />
Concern exists over inconsistent policy<br />
implementation, with lack of long-term<br />
confidence in reforms.<br />
Akinwumi Ayodeji Adesina, Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of Nigeria, was named Forbes’ African of the Year<br />
for his reforms to the country’s farming sector, including through the GES programme.<br />
132<br />
Nigeria<br />
Nigeria<br />
133