02.05.2014 Views

WEF_GrowAfrica_AnnualReport2014

WEF_GrowAfrica_AnnualReport2014

WEF_GrowAfrica_AnnualReport2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2013 in Review 2013 in Review<br />

2013 action for transformation<br />

SPOTLIGHT<br />

E-Wallet vouchers – Subsidy overhaul eliminates<br />

graft in input distribution and boosts food security<br />

Leadership and alignment<br />

Infrastructure and policy<br />

•¡<br />

Strong support and leadership from the<br />

Honourable Minister of Agriculture and<br />

Rural Development.<br />

•¡<br />

A multi-stakeholder “Champions Group” is<br />

being established.<br />

Strategy setting<br />

•¡<br />

The ATA provides strong strategic and<br />

operational direction, including defining<br />

priority value chains and launching Staple<br />

Crop Processing Zones.<br />

•¡<br />

A CAADP Investment Plan is in place.<br />

Investment pipeline<br />

•¡<br />

A FMARD Agribusiness and Investment<br />

Unit (AIU) has been established to promote<br />

and facilitate sectoral investment.<br />

•¡<br />

Government leadership has stimulated<br />

domestic and international interest to<br />

inherent Nigerian market opportunities.<br />

•¡<br />

Value-chain partnerships are developing<br />

broadly, including an influx of rice millers.<br />

•¡<br />

There are currently not enough commercial<br />

growers of high-quality cassava to<br />

adequately support cassava flour milling.<br />

Risk mitigation and financing<br />

•¡<br />

Minimal government provision of<br />

infrastructure means many companies must<br />

finance their on-farm infrastructure and<br />

power generators.<br />

•¡<br />

Lack of standardised government<br />

procedures can add costs to doing<br />

business, for example, Customs or the<br />

National Agency for Food and Drug<br />

Administration and Control (NAFDAC)<br />

are not fully aligned with FMARD. More<br />

generally, permit granting can be slow and<br />

exposed to corruption.<br />

•¡<br />

Price volatility and an uneven playing field<br />

are caused by smuggling and by import<br />

waivers for select producers.<br />

Delivery and implementation<br />

•¡<br />

FMARD and the AIU demonstrate strong<br />

capacity for coordination and delivery of<br />

initiatives and reforms.<br />

•¡<br />

No functional inter-ministerial group<br />

exists to coordinate agribusiness enabling<br />

environment improvements, and there<br />

appears to be limited communication<br />

between ministries and agencies.<br />

•¡<br />

Demand exceeds government capacity to<br />

facilitate investments and provide linkages<br />

to partners or financing. In some cases, this<br />

raises possibility of scaling down planned<br />

investment.<br />

Since 1967, the Government of Nigeria has had a<br />

policy intended to deliver subsidised inputs, particularly<br />

fertiliser, to help farmers improve crop yields. Under the<br />

longstanding programme, the Federal Government was<br />

the sole procurer of fertiliser, which it then re-sold at<br />

subsidised prices to distributors for delivery through a<br />

complex chain for eventual sale to farmers from Wardlevel<br />

warehouses. Farmers expected to be charged a<br />

fixed and heavily-subsidised price, despite significant<br />

differences in handling costs and market forces across<br />

the country.<br />

However, the subsidy policy suffered from multiple<br />

problems, including wide-scale corruption and<br />

inefficiencies. A massive diversion of supply benefitted<br />

middlemen and rent-seekers, while some fertiliser<br />

was smuggled to neighbouring countries. The lengthy<br />

and cumbersome bureaucratic tendering process<br />

often caused late delivery of inputs, and despite the<br />

considerable fiscal burden to the government, the<br />

impact on agricultural productivity was mixed at best.<br />

Between 1980 and 2010, over $5.4 billion was spent<br />

on fertiliser subsidies but no more than 11% of farmers<br />

received these fertilisers, so that over $4.8 billion<br />

was estimated as lost to corruption. Furthermore,<br />

the system displaced the private sector in the inputs<br />

distribution value chain.<br />

In 2012, the Growth Enhancement Support (GES)<br />

programme began shifting to an industry system that<br />

incorporates private agro-dealers as the purchasers of<br />

fertiliser (and seed) from established fertiliser suppliers<br />

(rather than the government), giving them responsibility<br />

for distribution of the inputs at agreed-upon centres<br />

in local communities. This afforded millions of farmers<br />

access to the subsidised fertiliser for the first time. The<br />

GES “e-Wallet” system also promotes the utilisation of<br />

mobile technology to send farmers vouchers that they<br />

can redeem at distribution centres.<br />

Small-scale farmers with less than 3 ha of land are<br />

entitled to a 50% subsidy on two bags of highquality<br />

fertiliser. In 2012, during the first year of the<br />

programme, 1.2 million smallholders were reached. In<br />

2013, 4.5 million farmers redeemed their “e-Wallet”<br />

voucher, with the goal being to reach 20 million farmers<br />

by 2015.<br />

In the initial two years of the programme 750,000<br />

tonnes of fertiliser has been delivered to farmers,<br />

along with 55,000 tonnes of improved seeds. The use<br />

of these inputs has resulted in 15.5 million tonnes of<br />

food being produced, such that FMARD credits the<br />

programme with also providing improved food security<br />

to 30 million persons in farming households.<br />

Additionally, over 800 agro-dealers and 25 fertiliser and<br />

seed suppliers are registered with the programme and<br />

operational. 2012 also saw $192 million of privatesector<br />

financing commitments leveraged, aided by<br />

guarantees from the Central Bank to commercial<br />

banks that allow them to reduce the risk of lending to<br />

the fertiliser and seed companies (under the NIRSAL<br />

initiative).<br />

•¡<br />

Several different financing initiatives<br />

and instruments have been initiated but<br />

implementation and uptake is still in the<br />

very early stages<br />

•¡<br />

NIRSAL is helping, but beyond NIRSAL<br />

there are few financing options for large<br />

commercial agribusinesses.<br />

•¡<br />

SCPZ company designation is at times<br />

slow.<br />

•¡<br />

Companies report that state governments<br />

are sometimes easier to work with than the<br />

national government.<br />

•¡<br />

NIRSAL and FAFIN are not seen as<br />

adequate substitutes for planned shutdown<br />

of the Commercial Agricultural Credit<br />

Scheme when it expires in 2016.<br />

•¡<br />

Concern exists over inconsistent policy<br />

implementation, with lack of long-term<br />

confidence in reforms.<br />

Akinwumi Ayodeji Adesina, Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of Nigeria, was named Forbes’ African of the Year<br />

for his reforms to the country’s farming sector, including through the GES programme.<br />

132<br />

Nigeria<br />

Nigeria<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!