Requirements on Consumer Information about Product ... - ANEC
Requirements on Consumer Information about Product ... - ANEC
Requirements on Consumer Information about Product ... - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C<strong>on</strong>sumer Informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>about</strong> PCF<br />
in brochures, advertisements etc. => Therefore cars were chosen as another product<br />
example.<br />
The third most important product field c<strong>on</strong>cerning greenhouse gas emissi<strong>on</strong>s is food with a<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>about</strong> 20% to the overall greenhouse gas emissi<strong>on</strong>s of a household. Moreover,<br />
food is the product group for which by far most of the carb<strong>on</strong> labels are being<br />
developed at the moment. => Therefore food was chosen as product example.<br />
Household appliances are resp<strong>on</strong>sible for <strong>about</strong> 8% of the greenhouse gas emissi<strong>on</strong>s and<br />
are the main c<strong>on</strong>sumers of electricity in households. Furthermore, a mandatory energy label<br />
for household appliances already exists. => Accordingly, household appliances were also<br />
chosen as product example.<br />
In the product group informati<strong>on</strong> & communicati<strong>on</strong>, paper with an overall share of 3,2% is a<br />
significant c<strong>on</strong>tributor. => Therefore paper was also chosen as product example.<br />
The product group clothing does not show up with a significant c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>. As the data base<br />
for textiles is incomplete, however, the figures seem to be uncertain. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally it is a<br />
product group where carb<strong>on</strong> labels already exist (see EarthPositive 2009) and where it can<br />
be assumed that c<strong>on</strong>sumers are interested in.<br />
For the sake of completeness, in the following figure the share of the greenhouse gas<br />
emissi<strong>on</strong>s of the private households in the eight product fields are compared with other<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact categories (Quack and Rüdenauer 2007). One can see that the overall<br />
significance of the product fields does not change much: mobility changes place with building<br />
& housing for being most important c<strong>on</strong>cerning eutrophicati<strong>on</strong>, photochemical oz<strong>on</strong>e creati<strong>on</strong><br />
and the overall envir<strong>on</strong>mental burden. Third most important is still food.<br />
36