Requirements on Consumer Information about Product ... - ANEC
Requirements on Consumer Information about Product ... - ANEC
Requirements on Consumer Information about Product ... - ANEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
C<strong>on</strong>sumer Informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>about</strong> PCF<br />
- subsequent discussi<strong>on</strong> by a panel of experts;<br />
- final decisi<strong>on</strong> by an “envir<strong>on</strong>mental jury” <strong>on</strong> which relevant stakeholder groups are<br />
represented;<br />
- certified award process and checking of the criteria for products marked with the<br />
ecolabel.<br />
Drawing up of <strong>Product</strong> Category Rules for particularly relevant products is essential<br />
The main challenge of PCF meant for communicati<strong>on</strong> is to define the whole framework in a<br />
way that all products bel<strong>on</strong>ging to <strong>on</strong>e product group can be calculated in an as much as<br />
possible defined way to assure the same approach even if the studies are performed by<br />
different experts. This requires e.g. the same goals, the same system boundaries, the same<br />
calculati<strong>on</strong> rules and similar data quality for different studies. With a general ISO standard<br />
this can not be achieved as it <strong>on</strong>ly provides generic rules. Therefore it is essential for the<br />
future that product category rules (PCRs) will be developed that ensure a comparable<br />
proceeding within <strong>on</strong>e product group. Such PCRs would have to be defined and adopted at<br />
the European level. Given the many different product groups this will take time and needs<br />
prioritisati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Basing <strong>on</strong> PCF it is not possible at the moment to perform product comparis<strong>on</strong>s of multiple<br />
products carried out <strong>on</strong> behalf of different clients and by different practiti<strong>on</strong>ers as well as<br />
public comparis<strong>on</strong> with competing products in ways that are acceptable under competiti<strong>on</strong><br />
law (e.g. through reporting of CO2e values or use of CO2e labels).<br />
Methodological restricti<strong>on</strong>s when using the LCA / PCF approach<br />
For the PCF approach the same is true as for the general LCA approach: The assessment of<br />
the whole life cycle is a strength compared to other techniques. The approach can be used to<br />
compare products with similar functi<strong>on</strong> but differing producti<strong>on</strong> and/or operating technologies.<br />
Still the methodology has some restricti<strong>on</strong>s that have to be kept in mind when applying it:<br />
Like LCA also PCF is per definiti<strong>on</strong>em a purely quantitative tool. As it has to be requested<br />
that at least a screening analyses <strong>on</strong> other envir<strong>on</strong>mental impacts then greenhouse gases<br />
has to be performed in a PCF study, the same problems occur as with LCA. Current LCAapproaches<br />
cannot exhaustively cover site-specific aspects: as greenhouse gases have a<br />
global impact and no site-specific <strong>on</strong>e, this weakness does not apply to PCF studies in the<br />
narrow sense. As for LCA, the variability and reliability of data may represent a problem<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cerning data quality (e.g. time-related, geographical and technology coverage), data<br />
origin, effort of data acquisiti<strong>on</strong> and possibly fast changes of supply chains. Spatial and<br />
temporal variati<strong>on</strong>s are theoretically no obstacle for the applicability of LCA / PCF in product<br />
64