Seattle, Washington FBI Bureau File - Paperless Archives

KCSO Case #Unassigned
April 24, 2007 [hpj
Witness Statement
Oet.1 1
STEVE HOBBS:
....----------,
Yes.
... that had been rejected by, okay, it's clear there is no match on the
State level.
I believe we have sent even if there were matches, so that you could see
where one looks valid versus one that doesn't look valid.
I think there's one initialed we haven't sent over yet. It's a little one.
R-O, the 89.
Oh, no, we have, it looks like ...
How many do you have there?
I have ...
STEVE HOBBS:
We can, we can confirm that later, it's not crucial.
1...-_____ ---11 Okay. That's fine.
STEVE HOBBS:
But this is an important pOint, I need to be clear on this. Are you saying
that in our packet there are valid registrations as well?
Um-hm.
Because I know the first batch that I sent over, um, and went over with
I land I l we were showing an example of the one
that looked right and it validated and you, on the matrix that we created
for you where it has to be db, we'll have a yes by it and for the first few
batches that we did, we gave complete batches, so you could see what
the pattern looked like. As we go further down, because we didn't want to
have to pull 1200 everything, you're getting samplings in the later ones
but I do know for sure in the first few you did end up with some that had
valid registrations as part of them.
STEVE HOBBS:
So this was clear. I think the next step we'7 gOinrc to have to do before
we scan any of this in, is go through, I think and I will have to go
through and be absolutely clear that we pulled all the valid, what you
perceive as valid registrations out.
1...-______ ....11 Yes.
STEVE HOBBS:
And that we have all of the invalid ones that we don't have.
Page 4 of 9