13.05.2014 Views

Seattle, Washington FBI Bureau File - Paperless Archives

Seattle, Washington FBI Bureau File - Paperless Archives

Seattle, Washington FBI Bureau File - Paperless Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KCSO Case #Unassigned<br />

April 24, 2007 [hpJ<br />

Witness Statement<br />

Del.I 1<br />

STEVE HOBBS:<br />

Okay.<br />

All right. Urn, and then we met with the Prosecuting Attorney's Office in<br />

March, went over our first, urn, several batches that we had pulled in the<br />

patches that, urn, we provided, we provided a matrix that tracks kind of<br />

that whole process and all of the documents. It includes the, urn, the<br />

batch, in, that we bundled them in, that we processed by, urn, the date<br />

that we sent them to the Prosecuting Attorney.<br />

The reg number in our system, first name, last name, date of birth, their<br />

status right now, are they active or inactive in our system as of the time<br />

that we generated this report. Um, whether or not they passed at the, in<br />

the voter registration database because if they passed the voter<br />

registration database the presumption is it's a good registration, um, that<br />

we sent a voter notification card. And if it was returned, urn, if we, if the, if<br />

the registration was fatally pended or was missing required information<br />

and a letter was sent for that and if it was returned ...<br />

b7C<br />

STEVE HOBBS:<br />

I'll ask you a question right there.<br />

Yes.<br />

STEVE HOBBS:<br />

Are you saying then that somebody might have come passed the voter<br />

registration datab.ase, so productively valid but they might have been<br />

missing information on their form and so that's why you sent out the<br />

letter?<br />

Yes.<br />

STEVE HOBBS:<br />

Okay. All right.<br />

Potentially, potentially. Um, and then we have the failed 10 letter, which<br />

is that letter that we send out around election cycle to let them that they<br />

have an 10 requirement in order for their ballot to be counted. And then in<br />

February we had an entirely by mail election in the City of <strong>Seattle</strong> related<br />

to the viaduct, and, um, because of that, it meant that poll voters who<br />

traditionally voted at the polls had to vote an absentee ballot. When we<br />

process absentee ballots, we actually do a signature comparison to, from<br />

the ballot to the signature on file, um, in our database.<br />

Poll voters we don't do that for because they have 10 when they come to<br />

the polling location. So we don't validate it against the electronic<br />

signature that we captured online. Because we knew we had to do that<br />

and for a number of these voters that had been many, many years since<br />

they had updated their signature on line, we sent out letters to everyone<br />

in the City of <strong>Seattle</strong> asking for signature updates that was a poll voter, so<br />

that we could and capture that signature prior to getting the absentee<br />

Page 7 of 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!