14.05.2014 Views

Anza Borrego Desert State Park - California State Parks - State of ...

Anza Borrego Desert State Park - California State Parks - State of ...

Anza Borrego Desert State Park - California State Parks - State of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Final Report – October 2001<br />

How Do Visitors View the Acceptability <strong>of</strong> Ecological,<br />

Managerial and Social Conditions Within the <strong>Park</strong>?<br />

In addition to the information gathered to this point, managers are interested in the<br />

specific reactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Park</strong> visitors when presented with a range <strong>of</strong> conditions that might<br />

be found within the <strong>Park</strong>. The issues presented were:<br />

1. Off-road use, vegetation loss – Coyote Canyon<br />

2. Crowding, solitude – Blair Valley, Fish Creek<br />

3. Trail standards – <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon, Mountain Palm Springs<br />

The Photo Series<br />

For the last set <strong>of</strong> questions in the survey, six images were used to measure the<br />

acceptability <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> ecological or managerial conditions. To do this in a<br />

meaningful way, UM researchers worked with <strong>Park</strong> staff to produce a possible<br />

progression <strong>of</strong> scenarios depicting a reasonable scope <strong>of</strong> conditions. In Coyote Canyon,<br />

the photo set portrayed a range <strong>of</strong> vegetation loss due to <strong>of</strong>f-road vehicle use (Panel 1).<br />

For Blair Valley and Fish Creek survey locations, a similar photo collection was used<br />

depicting a range from solitude to highly crowded conditions (Panels 2 and 3). For<br />

Mountain Palm Springs and <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon, the photo series depicted a<br />

continuum <strong>of</strong> trail conditions spanning low use and low standard, to very high use, the<br />

trail signed and paved (Panes 4 and 5). Respondents at each site were asked to judge<br />

the acceptability <strong>of</strong> the six photos along a nine-point scale, from –4 (very unacceptable)<br />

to +4 (very acceptable), with a neutral zero point.<br />

The photos used in each <strong>of</strong> the three sets were artificially enhanced by computer. An<br />

original photo was scanned for each photo set and then elements were added, removed,<br />

or otherwise manipulated in order to create the effect. For example, in the Coyote<br />

Canyon photo set, Photo 1 is the original image, with a sign removed for simplicity. All<br />

other characteristics in the subsequent photos in that set were airbrushed or otherwise<br />

manipulated to depict increasing levels <strong>of</strong> vegetation loss and impacts associated with<br />

<strong>of</strong>f-road vehicle use. For Blair Valley and Fish Creek, the original image is Photo 6, with<br />

other photos showing a progression <strong>of</strong> more campers, from none in Photo 1 to extremely<br />

crowded conditions in Photo 6. In the photo set for <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon and Mountain<br />

Palm Springs, Photo 5 is the original, with more or less trail development and<br />

maintenance portrayed in the other photos.<br />

Acceptability <strong>of</strong> Vegetation Loss at Coyote Canyon<br />

We used two different methods to evaluate the visitors’ responses to the photo series <strong>of</strong><br />

questions. First, the mean <strong>of</strong> the responses for both fall and spring were plotted for each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the photos. A positive mean score indicates that the conditions represented in the<br />

photo were acceptable, while a negative mean score suggests that the conditions<br />

represented in the photo were unacceptable to most visitors who participated in the<br />

study. Second, we evaluated the 50 th percentile <strong>of</strong> respondents and the photo in the<br />

series where they shifted from “acceptable” to “unacceptable” (Tables 37 and 38)<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!