14.05.2014 Views

Anza Borrego Desert State Park - California State Parks - State of ...

Anza Borrego Desert State Park - California State Parks - State of ...

Anza Borrego Desert State Park - California State Parks - State of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Final Report – October 2001<br />

Percent<br />

40 40<br />

35 35<br />

30 30<br />

25 25<br />

20 20<br />

15 15<br />

34.42<br />

30.84<br />

10 10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

11.36<br />

9.42<br />

8.44<br />

5.52<br />

Photo1 Photo 2 Photo 13 Photo 4 Photo 5 Photo 6<br />

Figure 45. Highest level <strong>of</strong> trail standard tolerated – <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon<br />

Acceptability <strong>of</strong> Trail Standards at Mountain Palm Springs<br />

The issue identified by ABDSP staff for Mountain Palm Springs also included questions<br />

<strong>of</strong> trail standards and maintenance, as at <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon. To assess these<br />

preferences, a photo series identical to that used at <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon (Panel 5) was<br />

used portraying a range <strong>of</strong> trail conditions (Photos 1 through 6),<br />

The question presented to visitors taking the survey was:<br />

<strong>Anza</strong>-<strong>Borrego</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Park</strong> provides a variety <strong>of</strong> trails. The computer-generated<br />

photographs simulate a range <strong>of</strong> trail conditions that the <strong>Park</strong> can provide. The managers<br />

are interested in your opinion on how trail standards may affect your experience. To<br />

help us assess this, please indicate the acceptability <strong>of</strong> the conditions represented by<br />

each photo. The photo indicates what the trail would be like all the way to <strong>Borrego</strong><br />

Palm Springs. A rating <strong>of</strong> –4 signifies conditions are very unacceptable; a rating <strong>of</strong> +4 is<br />

very acceptable.<br />

The responses to this question and set <strong>of</strong> photos was very mixed (Tables 54 and 55).<br />

The acceptability rating <strong>of</strong> Photo 1 (71.7%) was lower than that <strong>of</strong> Photo 2 (85.9%) in a<br />

similar way as occurred in the <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon results. In Photos 3 (77.1%) and 4<br />

(73.2%), acceptability was still higher than that <strong>of</strong> Photo 1, but not to the degree <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon results. This may indicate that the Mountain Palm Springs survey<br />

participants were less accepting <strong>of</strong> the additional trail engineering and evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

impacts portrayed in Photos 3 and 4, compared to the <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon sample. At<br />

Photo 5 however, acceptability drops below 50%, although the mean is still barely above<br />

the zero-line (Figures 46 and 47, Tables 54 and 55). By the time trail conditions depicted<br />

in Photo 6 are reached, a large majority <strong>of</strong> visitors (75.2%) find the trail unacceptable.<br />

Like the results <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Borrego</strong> Palm Canyon group, the shape <strong>of</strong> the acceptability curve<br />

for the Mountain Palm Springs sample is parabolic. Similarly, it indicates the preferred<br />

trail conditions for most visitors lie somewhere in the range <strong>of</strong> conditions portrayed in<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!