REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
targets at the <strong>Europe</strong>an level is opposed by bus<strong>in</strong>ess organisations. This notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>Europe</strong> positions also suggest that it is not opposed, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, to elaborat<strong>in</strong>g common<br />
procedural standards and similar measures. Secondly, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>Europe</strong>’s position on proposals for new<br />
<strong>in</strong>struments regard<strong>in</strong>g legal migration places a certa<strong>in</strong> emphasis on the reduction of bureaucracy and<br />
other practical obstacles, which, as Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>Europe</strong> argues, often leads bus<strong>in</strong>esses to irregularly<br />
employ migrant workers. This suggests that Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>Europe</strong> is likely to support measures that help to<br />
avoid what we discuss (<strong>in</strong> §3.3.3) under the head<strong>in</strong>g of the ‘creation of illegal immigrants’. Thirdly,<br />
however, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>Europe</strong> opposes strengthen<strong>in</strong>g and uniformly regulat<strong>in</strong>g the rights of legal migrants<br />
admitted as workers – an option which we view as important <strong>in</strong> terms of avoid<strong>in</strong>g that legal migrants<br />
(or their family members) lapse <strong>in</strong>to illegality. Fourthly, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>Europe</strong> calls for comprehensive<br />
measures on illegal migration, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g employer sanctions, facilitated recruitment of migrant<br />
workers, enforcement of return and, if not prom<strong>in</strong>ently, regularisation as a possible alternative to<br />
return, should return not be enforceable. 216<br />
5.3.3 <strong>Europe</strong>an Association of Craft, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises<br />
(UEAPME)<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> basis for our review of policy positions of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Association of Craft, Small and<br />
Medium Sized Enterprises (UEAPME) is policy papers comment<strong>in</strong>g on: (i) the proposal for a<br />
directive on a s<strong>in</strong>gle application procedure for a s<strong>in</strong>gle permit for third-country nationals to reside and<br />
work <strong>in</strong> the territory of a Member State; (ii) the proposal for a directive for sanction<strong>in</strong>g employers<br />
employ<strong>in</strong>g illegal immigrants; and (iii) the Green Paper on an EU approach to manag<strong>in</strong>g economic<br />
migration.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to UEAPME, the role of the EU <strong>in</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g legal migration <strong>in</strong> general relates to the<br />
development of a “step-by-step harmonisation of criteria and procedures”, “while respect<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
sovereignty of Member States.” 217 The concept of legal migration is further narrowed to economic<br />
migration. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of sovereignty means that the Member States should have the exclusive<br />
competence to decide on the number of immigrants to be admitted from third countries. 218 In this<br />
context, UEAPME agrees with the proposal for a s<strong>in</strong>gle procedure for third country nationals to reside<br />
and work <strong>in</strong> the EU and particularly with the creation of a ‘one-stop-shop’ system, “as this will help to<br />
make the immigration process more transparent and less burdensome.” 219 In addition, UEAPME<br />
216 In our <strong>in</strong>terpretation, the formulation “quick repatriation of illegal migrants respect<strong>in</strong>g their legitimate rights”<br />
does suggest regularisation if “legitimate rights” can only be upheld by regularis<strong>in</strong>g irregular migrants.<br />
217 UEAPME (2007): UEAPME position paper on the proposal for a directive on a s<strong>in</strong>gle application procedure<br />
for a s<strong>in</strong>gle permit for third-country nationals to reside and work <strong>in</strong> the territory of a Member State and on a<br />
common set of rights for third country workers legally resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a Member State. Available at:<br />
http://www.ueapme.com/docs/pos_papers/2007/071205_pp_framework_directive_immigration.pdf , 23 April<br />
2008, p.1.<br />
218 UEAPME (2005): UEAPME’s position paper on the Green Paper on an EU approach to manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Economic Migration COM (2004) 811. Available at:<br />
http://www.ueapme.com/docs/pos_papers/2005/EconomicMigration.doc , 23 April 2008, p.1<br />
219 Ibid.<br />
72