Annual report 2002 - EOI
Annual report 2002 - EOI
Annual report 2002 - EOI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66 ANNUAL REPORT | <strong>2002</strong><br />
3.3 The Ombudsman considers that the Commission has taken steps in order to settle the<br />
matter as concerns this aspect of the case.<br />
4 Conclusion<br />
It appears from the Commission’s opinion and the complainant’s observations that the<br />
European Commission has taken steps to settle the matter and has thereby satisfied the<br />
complainant. The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.<br />
THE COMMISSION<br />
PUTS AN END TO<br />
UNPAID<br />
TRAINEESHIPS<br />
Decision on complaint<br />
1456/2001/ADB<br />
against the European<br />
Commission<br />
THE COMPLAINT<br />
The complainant was a student who applied for a traineeship at the European Commission.<br />
The Commission offered him an unpaid traineeship. Given that he had no income, he had<br />
to face a difficult choice. Either accepting the offer with its consequences on his daily life,<br />
or refusing this important opportunity because of his limited financial resources. Hence he<br />
complained to the Ombudsman and alleged that the Commission’s offering unpaid traineeships<br />
constituted a discrimination against applicants with limited financial resources;<br />
especially because the number of unpaid traineeships represented only a small part of all<br />
the traineeships offered by the Commission.<br />
The complainant claimed that the Commission should reconsider its position towards his<br />
personal situation.<br />
THE INQUIRY<br />
The European Commission’s opinion<br />
Since 1997, the Commission progressively increased its appropriations for traineeships in<br />
order to pay the highest possible number of trainees. The Commission informed the<br />
Ombudsman that from March <strong>2002</strong> onwards all recruited trainees shall be paid.<br />
In 2001, 97% out of 1200 trainees were offered paid traineeships. Trainees who accepted<br />
an unpaid traineeship however benefited from funds available further to late arrivals or<br />
early departures of paid trainees. In the complainant’s case, the Commission was able to<br />
pay him a full five-month grant for his five-month traineeship.<br />
THE DECISION<br />
It appears from the Commission’s comments that the European Commission has taken<br />
steps to settle the matter. The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.<br />
ALLEGED FAILURE<br />
TO PAY THE LAST<br />
SECTION OF<br />
FINANCIAL AID AS<br />
AGREED UPON<br />
Decision on complaint<br />
108/<strong>2002</strong>/OV<br />
(Confidential) against<br />
the European<br />
Commission<br />
THE COMPLAINT<br />
In January <strong>2002</strong>, Mr X made a complaint to the European Ombudsman on behalf of a<br />
French regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry (hereafter “the complainant”)<br />
concerning the Commission’s financial aid to the operation M. under the ECIP (European<br />
Community Investment Partners) programme. According to the complainant the relevant<br />
facts were as follows:<br />
On 1 December 1997 the complainant made a request for financial aid to the Commission<br />
for a budget of 170 000 € for the operation M. - ECIP. This operation started in January<br />
1998. In a letter of 21 January 1998, the Commission accepted the request for financial<br />
help for an amount of 85 000 €. The principal mission was carried out in April 1998. On<br />
10 July 1998, the Commission sent the Financial Contract, confirming a financial aid of<br />
85 000 €.