19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.4 Analogy with Quantum/Classical Mechanics 17<br />

1.4 Analogy with Quantum/Classical Mechanics<br />

Every so often, mathematics <strong>and</strong> physics are bestowed with a powerful mapping that equates<br />

two diverse topics. In one giant leap, years of accumulated knowledge on one topic can<br />

be instantly transferred to another. Here, we encounter such an example <strong>by</strong> the fact that a<br />

Gaussian chain in an external field maps onto the quantum mechanics of a single particle in a<br />

potential. For those without a background in quantum mechanics, the section can be skimmed<br />

over without seriously compromising one’s underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the remaining sections.<br />

The mapping becomes apparent when examining the path-integral formalism of quantum<br />

mechanics introduced <strong>by</strong> Feynman <strong>and</strong> Hibbs (1965). With incredible insight, they demonstrate<br />

that the quantum mechanical wavefunction, Ψ(r,t), for a particle of mass, m, ina<br />

potential, U(r), is given <strong>by</strong> the path integral,<br />

∫<br />

Ψ(r,t)= Dr p exp(iS/)δ(r p (t) − r) (1.47)<br />

over all possible trajectories, r p (t), where the particle terminates at position, r, at time, t.<br />

(Note that i ≡ √ −1.) In this definition, each trajectory contributes a phase factor given <strong>by</strong> the<br />

classical action,<br />

∫ [ m<br />

S ≡ dt<br />

2 |r′ p(t)| 2 − U(r p (t))]<br />

(1.48)<br />

which, in this case, is kinetic energy minus potential energy integrated along the particle<br />

trajectory. Naturally, Feynman justified this <strong>by</strong> showing that Eq. (1.47) is equivalent to the<br />

usual time-dependent Schrödinger equation,<br />

i ∂ [<br />

]<br />

∂t Ψ(r,t)= − 2<br />

2m ∇2 + U(r) Ψ(r,t) (1.49)<br />

in much the same way Section 1.2 derived the diffusion equation for q(r,s).<br />

Taking a closer look, the mathematics of this quantum mechanical problem is exactly that<br />

of our polymer in an external field. A precise mapping merely requires the associations,<br />

t ⇔ s (1.50)<br />

m ⇔ 3<br />

a 2 N<br />

(1.51)<br />

U(r) ⇔ −w(r) (1.52)<br />

S ⇔ E[r α;0,s]<br />

k B T<br />

(1.53)<br />

r p (t) ⇔ r α (s) (1.54)<br />

⇔ −i (1.55)<br />

Ψ(r,t) ⇔ q(r,s) (1.56)<br />

Indeed, these substitutions transform Eq. (1.47) for the wavefunction into Eq. (1.25) for the<br />

partition function of sN polymer segments, <strong>and</strong> likewise the Schrödinger Eq. (1.49) transforms<br />

into the diffusion Eq. (1.24).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!