19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60 1 <strong>Self</strong>-consistent field theory <strong>and</strong> its applications<br />

w A (r) <strong>and</strong> w B (r) are sufficiently small such that q(r,f) is well described <strong>by</strong> Eq. (1.99) with<br />

the field w A (r) <strong>and</strong> similarly such that q † (r,f) is given <strong>by</strong> Eq. (1.100) with the field w B (r).<br />

These approximations are then inserted into Eq. (1.274) to give<br />

Q[w A ,w B ]<br />

V<br />

∫<br />

1<br />

≈ 1+<br />

2(2π) 3 dk[S 11 w A (−k)w A (k)+<br />

V<br />

S 22 w B (−k)w B (k)+2S 12 w A (−k)w B (k)] (1.276)<br />

where S 11 ≡ g(x, f), S 22 ≡ g(x, 1 − f), <strong>and</strong> S 12 ≡ h(x, f)h(x, 1 − f). Differentiating<br />

Q[w A ,w B ] with respect to the Fourier transforms of the fields, as we did in Section 1.7.3,<br />

gives the Fourier transforms of the concentrations,<br />

φ A (k) = −S 11 w A (k) − S 12 w B (k) (1.277)<br />

φ B (k) = −S 22 w B (k) − S 12 w A (k) (1.278)<br />

for all k ≠0. These equations are then inverted to obtain the expressions,<br />

w A (k) = −S 22φ A (k)+S 12 φ B (k)<br />

det(S)<br />

(1.279)<br />

w B (k) = S 12φ A (k) − S 11 φ B (k)<br />

det(S)<br />

(1.280)<br />

for the fields, where det(S) ≡ S 11 S 22 − S12 2 . At this point, the incompressibility condition<br />

can be used to set φ B (k) =−φ A (k), for all k ≠0. Substituting the expressions for the two<br />

fields into that for Q[w A ,w B ], <strong>and</strong> then inserting that into the logarithm of Eq. (1.273) gives<br />

F<br />

nk B T<br />

= χNf(1 − f)+<br />

N<br />

to second order in |φ A (k)|, where<br />

S −1 (k) =<br />

2(2π) 3 V<br />

∫<br />

k≠0<br />

dk S −1 (k)φ A (−k)φ A (k) (1.281)<br />

g(x, 1)<br />

− 2χ (1.282)<br />

Ndet(S)<br />

is the inverse of the scattering function for a disordered melt. In a somewhat analogous but<br />

considerably more complicated procedure, the scattering functions can also be evaluated for<br />

periodically ordered phases (Yeung et al. 1996; Shi et al. 1996). It involves a very elegant<br />

method akin to b<strong>and</strong>-structure calculations in solid-state physics, providing yet another<br />

example of where SCFT draws upon existing techniques from quantum mechanics.<br />

Figure 1.16 shows the disordered-state S(k) for diblock copolymers of symmetric composition,<br />

f =0.5, plotted for a series of χN values. As the interaction strength increases, S(k)<br />

develops a peak over a sphere of wavevectors at radius, kaN 1/2 =4.77, which corresponds<br />

to composition fluctuations of wavelength, D/aN 1/2 =1.318. The peak eventually diverges<br />

at χN =10.495, at which point the disordered state becomes unstable <strong>and</strong> switches <strong>by</strong> a<br />

continuous transition to the ordered lamellar phase. With the exception of f =0.5, the spinodal<br />

point is preempted <strong>by</strong> a discontinuous transition to the ordered phase, but an approximate<br />

treatment of this requires, at the very least, fourth-order terms in the free energy expansion of<br />

Eq. (1.281) (Leibler 1980). Better yet, the next section will show how to calculate the exact<br />

mean-field phase boundaries.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!