19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.6 Polymer Brushes 31<br />

1.6.3 Diffusion Equation for a Parabolic Potential<br />

In Section 1.2, we established that the path-integral definition of the partition function is equivalent<br />

to the one based on the diffusion equation, just as Feynman’s path-integral formalism of<br />

quantum mechanics coincides with Schrödinger’s differential equation. As in quantum mechanics,<br />

the differential equation approach is generally the more practical method of calculating<br />

q(z,z 0 ,s). Here, we demonstrate that it indeed gives identical results to those obtained in<br />

the previous section, where the path-integral approach was used.<br />

Normally the diffusion Eq. (1.24) has to be solved numerically, but there already exists a<br />

known analytical solution for parabolic potentials (Merzbacher 1970). In fact, it was originally<br />

derived for the wavefunction of a simple harmonic oscillator; once again, we benefit from the<br />

analogy with quantum mechanics. Transforming the quantum mechanical wavefunction in<br />

Merzbacher (1970), according to Eqs. (1.50)-(1.56) for the parabolic potential in Eq. (1.113),<br />

gives<br />

(<br />

q(z,z 0 ,s)=<br />

3<br />

4sin(πs/2)<br />

) 1/2 (<br />

exp − 3π[(z2 + z0 2)cos(πs/2) − 2zz )<br />

0]<br />

4a 2 N sin(πs/2)<br />

(1.138)<br />

Although the derivation of this expression is complicated, it is relatively trivial to confirm that<br />

it is in fact the proper solution to Eq. (1.24) for the initial condition, q(z,z 0 , 0) = aN 1/2 δ(z −<br />

z 0 ).<br />

Substituting z =0<strong>and</strong> s =1into Eq. (1.138), we find that q(0,z 0 , 1) = √ 3/4, consistent<br />

with the path-integral calculation in Eq. (1.127). In terms of the partition function, the<br />

distribution of the sN’th segment is given <strong>by</strong><br />

ρ(z; z 0 ; s) = q(0,z,1 − s)q(z,z 0,s)<br />

(1.139)<br />

q(0,z,1)<br />

The derivation is essentially the same as that for Eq. (1.31). Inserting Eq. (1.138) <strong>and</strong> simplifying<br />

with some basic trigonometric identities gives the identical expression to that in Eq.<br />

(1.134), as required <strong>by</strong> the equivalence of the two approaches. Given this, the remaining results<br />

of the preceding section follow. One slight difference is that we now obtain a specific<br />

value for the unknown constant in Eq. (1.137), because the initial condition for q(z,z 0 ,s),<br />

in effect, selects a proportionality constant for Eq. (1.127), but not one with any physical<br />

significance. Nevertheless, this provides us with a st<strong>and</strong>ard reference <strong>by</strong> which to compare<br />

calculations.<br />

1.6.4 <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Consistent</strong> <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> (SCFT) for a Brush<br />

The parabolic potential used up to now is only approximate. The argument for it assumes that<br />

the tension at the free chain-end is zero, but there is in fact a small entropic force that acts to<br />

broaden the end-segment distribution, g(z 0 ) (<strong>Matsen</strong> 2002b). Here, the self-consistent field<br />

theory (SCFT) is described for determining the field in a more rigorous manner. The theory<br />

starts with the partition function for the entire system, which is written as<br />

∫ ( )<br />

∏<br />

n<br />

Z ∝ ˜Dr α δ(z α (1) − ɛ) δ[1 − ˆφ] (1.140)<br />

α=1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!