Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen
Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen
Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
30 1 <strong>Self</strong>-consistent field theory <strong>and</strong> its applications<br />
1.2<br />
φ(z;z 0<br />
)<br />
0.8<br />
0.4<br />
1<br />
2<br />
z 0<br />
/aN 1/2 = 4<br />
0.0<br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
z/aN 1/2<br />
Figure 1.6: Segment distributions, φ(z; z 0), of polymers extended to various z = z 0 in the<br />
parabolic potential, Eq. (1.113). The dashed curves denote the distributions, Eq. (1.117), of the<br />
classical paths.<br />
The strong-stretching approximation is inaccurate until z 0 /aN 1/2 1, <strong>and</strong> even then it is<br />
rather poor for z ≈ z 0 . Of course this should not be surprising, as there is relatively little<br />
tension at the free end of the chain.<br />
Now we evaluate the average elastic energy, f e (z 0 ), of a fluctuating chain extended to<br />
z = z 0 . This is obtained <strong>by</strong> taking the free energy of a chain in the parabolic potential <strong>and</strong><br />
subtracting off the average field energy. In mathematical terms,<br />
∫<br />
f e (z 0 )<br />
k B T<br />
= − ln q(0,z 0, 1) − dz w(z)φ(z; z 0 ) (1.135)<br />
Although there is no analytical formula for φ(z; z 0 ), Eq. (1.116) allows the field energy to be<br />
expressed as<br />
∫ 1<br />
∫ L<br />
ds dz w(z)ρ(z; z 0 ,s)=− 3π2 z0<br />
2<br />
0 0<br />
16a 2 N − 1 (1.136)<br />
4<br />
which can be evaluated <strong>by</strong> integrating first over z <strong>and</strong> then s. Therefore, the entropic free<br />
energy of the chain is<br />
f e (z 0 )<br />
k B T = 3π2 z0<br />
2<br />
16a 2 + constant (1.137)<br />
N<br />
which is precisely the same as predicted <strong>by</strong> SST, Eq. (1.120), apart from the additive constant.<br />
The unknown constant appears because we are unable to specify the proportionality constant<br />
in Eq. (1.127), which in turn is because the coarse-graining procedure prevents us from knowing<br />
the absolute entropy of the chain; the best we can do is calculate relative changes in<br />
entropy.