Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen
Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen
Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
68 1 <strong>Self</strong>-consistent field theory <strong>and</strong> its applications<br />
accurate as it was in Fig. 1.13(b) for the homopolymer blend. A much better approximation,<br />
[<br />
w I = √ 2a 1+ 4 ( ) ] 1/3 3<br />
6χ π π 2 (1.299)<br />
χN<br />
denoted <strong>by</strong> the dotted curve in Fig. 1.17(c), can be derived <strong>by</strong> accounting for the connectivity<br />
of the A <strong>and</strong> B blocks (Semenov 1993), but it is considerably more complicated. For<br />
simplicity, we stick with the simple first-order approximation for γ I in Eq. (1.244).<br />
The stretching energies of the A <strong>and</strong> B blocks are approximated <strong>by</strong> noting that, as χN<br />
increases, the junction points become strongly pinned to narrow interfaces, while the domains<br />
swell in size. Consequently, the A <strong>and</strong> B domains can be described as strongly-stretched<br />
brushes. The lamellar (L) phase consists of four brushes per period, D, <strong>and</strong> it follows from<br />
the incompressibility constraint that the thicknesses of the A <strong>and</strong> B brushes are fD/2 <strong>and</strong><br />
(1−f)D/2, respectively. Since all the brushes are flat, their energies are given <strong>by</strong> Eq. (1.121),<br />
<strong>and</strong> thus the total free energy of the L phase, F L , can be approximated as<br />
F L<br />
nk B T = γ IΣ<br />
k B T + π2 [fD/2] 2<br />
8a 2 + π2 [(1 − f)D/2] 2<br />
[fN] 8a 2 [(1 − f)N]<br />
(1.300)<br />
where Σ=2N/Dρ 0 is the interfacial area per molecule. Inserting the interfacial tension from<br />
Eq. (1.244), the expression simplifies to<br />
F L<br />
nk B T =2 √<br />
χN<br />
6<br />
( ) −1 ( ) 2 D<br />
+ π2 D<br />
(1.301)<br />
aN 1/2 32 aN 1/2<br />
The equilibrium domain spacing, obtained <strong>by</strong> minimizing F L , is then given <strong>by</strong><br />
( ) 1/6<br />
D 8χN<br />
aN =2 1/2 3π 4 (1.302)<br />
which is shown in Fig. 1.17(b) with a dashed line. This provides the domain-size scaling<br />
alluded to earlier. Inserting the equilibrium value of D into Eq. (1.301) provides the final<br />
expression,<br />
F L<br />
nk B T = 1 4 (9π2 χN) 1/3 (1.303)<br />
for the free energy of the lamellar phase.<br />
For non-lamellar phases, the SST becomes complicated, unless the unit-cell approximation<br />
(UCA) is implemented. First of all, this allows the interfacial shape to be determined <strong>by</strong><br />
symmetry rather than <strong>by</strong> minimizing the free energy. For instance, the symmetry of the approximate<br />
unit cell shown in Fig. 1.19 for the cylindrical (C) phase implies a perfectly circular<br />
interface. Given this, the incompressibility condition requires the radius of the interface to be<br />
R I ≡ √ fR, from which it follows that the interfacial area per molecule is<br />
Σ= 2N√ f<br />
Rρ 0<br />
(1.304)