19.05.2014 Views

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

Self-Consistent Field Theory and Its Applications by M. W. Matsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 1 <strong>Self</strong>-consistent field theory <strong>and</strong> its applications<br />

accurate as it was in Fig. 1.13(b) for the homopolymer blend. A much better approximation,<br />

[<br />

w I = √ 2a 1+ 4 ( ) ] 1/3 3<br />

6χ π π 2 (1.299)<br />

χN<br />

denoted <strong>by</strong> the dotted curve in Fig. 1.17(c), can be derived <strong>by</strong> accounting for the connectivity<br />

of the A <strong>and</strong> B blocks (Semenov 1993), but it is considerably more complicated. For<br />

simplicity, we stick with the simple first-order approximation for γ I in Eq. (1.244).<br />

The stretching energies of the A <strong>and</strong> B blocks are approximated <strong>by</strong> noting that, as χN<br />

increases, the junction points become strongly pinned to narrow interfaces, while the domains<br />

swell in size. Consequently, the A <strong>and</strong> B domains can be described as strongly-stretched<br />

brushes. The lamellar (L) phase consists of four brushes per period, D, <strong>and</strong> it follows from<br />

the incompressibility constraint that the thicknesses of the A <strong>and</strong> B brushes are fD/2 <strong>and</strong><br />

(1−f)D/2, respectively. Since all the brushes are flat, their energies are given <strong>by</strong> Eq. (1.121),<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus the total free energy of the L phase, F L , can be approximated as<br />

F L<br />

nk B T = γ IΣ<br />

k B T + π2 [fD/2] 2<br />

8a 2 + π2 [(1 − f)D/2] 2<br />

[fN] 8a 2 [(1 − f)N]<br />

(1.300)<br />

where Σ=2N/Dρ 0 is the interfacial area per molecule. Inserting the interfacial tension from<br />

Eq. (1.244), the expression simplifies to<br />

F L<br />

nk B T =2 √<br />

χN<br />

6<br />

( ) −1 ( ) 2 D<br />

+ π2 D<br />

(1.301)<br />

aN 1/2 32 aN 1/2<br />

The equilibrium domain spacing, obtained <strong>by</strong> minimizing F L , is then given <strong>by</strong><br />

( ) 1/6<br />

D 8χN<br />

aN =2 1/2 3π 4 (1.302)<br />

which is shown in Fig. 1.17(b) with a dashed line. This provides the domain-size scaling<br />

alluded to earlier. Inserting the equilibrium value of D into Eq. (1.301) provides the final<br />

expression,<br />

F L<br />

nk B T = 1 4 (9π2 χN) 1/3 (1.303)<br />

for the free energy of the lamellar phase.<br />

For non-lamellar phases, the SST becomes complicated, unless the unit-cell approximation<br />

(UCA) is implemented. First of all, this allows the interfacial shape to be determined <strong>by</strong><br />

symmetry rather than <strong>by</strong> minimizing the free energy. For instance, the symmetry of the approximate<br />

unit cell shown in Fig. 1.19 for the cylindrical (C) phase implies a perfectly circular<br />

interface. Given this, the incompressibility condition requires the radius of the interface to be<br />

R I ≡ √ fR, from which it follows that the interfacial area per molecule is<br />

Σ= 2N√ f<br />

Rρ 0<br />

(1.304)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!