house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1059 Police: Funding<br />
[LORDS]<br />
Sri Lanka<br />
1060<br />
[LORD BRETT]<br />
job <strong>of</strong> policing their own areas. I do not quarrel with<br />
the first point. However, in the last year before capping,<br />
the band E council tax increase in England was 12.9 per<br />
cent—which is why capping became a necessity—but<br />
in Surrey it was 40 per cent.<br />
Baroness Hanham: My Lords—<br />
Lord Desai: My Lords—<br />
The Minister <strong>of</strong> State, Department <strong>of</strong> Energy and<br />
Climate Change (Lord Hunt <strong>of</strong> Kings Heath): My<br />
Lords, if we are quick, we can hear the noble Baroness<br />
first and then my noble friend.<br />
Baroness Hanham: My Lords, is the Minister satisfied<br />
that the reductions in the police force—there are<br />
reductions—as a result <strong>of</strong> the budget cuts will not give<br />
credence to the Home Office’s own predictions on the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> the recession <strong>of</strong> a rise in theft and burglary<br />
<strong>of</strong>fences, racist attacks and terrorism? What assurance<br />
can the Minister give the House that the police forces<br />
will remain with adequate manpower to deal with<br />
that?<br />
Lord Brett: My Lords, the responsibility that the<br />
noble Baroness charges me with is, <strong>of</strong> course, a charge<br />
on the local police authorities. They have resources—<br />
indeed, Surrey has £5.8 million in unallocated reserves—<br />
which they can use in whatever way they want. This<br />
carries with it a responsibility to act in accordance<br />
with the wishes not only <strong>of</strong> the council tax payers <strong>of</strong><br />
Surrey but <strong>of</strong> taxpayers at large. In that sense, the<br />
assurance the noble Baroness seeks is found in the<br />
activities <strong>of</strong> every other police authority that is living<br />
within its budget.<br />
Lord Desai: My Lords, is it not likely that capping<br />
will lead to beheading if there is a 10 per cent cut<br />
across the board—and especially in the Home Office<br />
budget—if we have the misfortune <strong>of</strong> the party opposite<br />
coming to power?<br />
Lord Brett: My Lords, far be it from me to intrude<br />
on private grief, but I am sure that the sponsor <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Question will bleat even more loudly in his annual<br />
Question next year or the year after if we get to the<br />
stage <strong>of</strong> having a Conservative Government and they<br />
do as they say and take £930 million out <strong>of</strong> the Home<br />
Office. Cutting police funding by the same 10 per cent<br />
as the rest <strong>of</strong> the Home Office could lose us 15,000<br />
police <strong>of</strong>ficers, exactly the number <strong>of</strong> extra police<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers delivered since this Government came to power<br />
in 1997. That means 30 <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong>f the beat in every<br />
constituency in England and 188 in Surrey.<br />
Sri Lanka<br />
Question<br />
3.09 pm<br />
Asked By Lord Naseby<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what financial<br />
help they will give to Sri Lanka in addition to<br />
contributions to international aid agencies to help<br />
with the resettlement <strong>of</strong> Tamils out <strong>of</strong> the displaced<br />
persons’ camps and into their former homes.<br />
Lord Brett: My Lords, DfID recently announced an<br />
additional £5 million in humanitarian funding to Sri<br />
Lanka, bringing the total committed to £12.5 million.<br />
That money will help the Government <strong>of</strong> Sri Lanka to<br />
meet their pledge to return 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> the 280,000<br />
displaced population to their homes by the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
year. All DfID humanitarian aid to Sri Lanka is<br />
provided directly to humanitarian agencies that are<br />
neutral and impartial in all contexts. The UK has no<br />
plans to provide funding to the Government <strong>of</strong> Sri<br />
Lanka.<br />
Lord Naseby: My Lords, I thank the Minister and<br />
the Government for that Answer with regard to the<br />
£12.5 million. It is extremely welcome and much needed.<br />
Is he aware that in the refugee camps there are four<br />
<strong>United</strong> Nations organisations and four international<br />
organisations that have free access, while 14 others<br />
have to work through the government agent? The<br />
greatest problem is resources. Is he aware that India<br />
has found 1 billion rupees, while Her Majesty’s<br />
Government have spent £650 million on infrastructure<br />
projects in Iraq? Will they perhaps consider diverting<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the aid budget to six infrastructure projects in<br />
Sri Lanka?<br />
Lord Brett: My Lords, I welcome the noble Lord’s<br />
comments and his appreciation <strong>of</strong> the Government’s<br />
endeavours. Some 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> the £12.5 million has<br />
been spent on international agencies and NGOs; I<br />
could spend the next minute regaling your Lordships<br />
with them, but I will not, on the basis <strong>of</strong> short answers<br />
to short questions, although I am happy to provide<br />
that information if he wants me to. About £6 million<br />
remains to be spent on the endeavours that the noble<br />
Lord mentioned and we keep under review the need<br />
for humanitarian aid. The question <strong>of</strong> diversion, though,<br />
is not an issue.<br />
Lord Desai: My Lords, are Her Majesty’s Government<br />
making any effort to consult the diaspora Sri Lankan<br />
groups here to try to form a Sinhala-speaking and<br />
Tamil-speaking people’s reconciliation group? That<br />
could help with reconciliation back home in Sri Lanka.<br />
Lord Brett: My Lords, my noble friend makes an<br />
interesting point. It is and has been the Government’s<br />
view that there is no military solution to the problems<br />
in Sri Lanka. Thankfully, we have a ceasefire in hostilities<br />
and we now need to build on a political solution using<br />
humanitarian aid not only from the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong><br />
but, as has been said, from India and other quarters,<br />
and to try to rebuild a community that understands<br />
the problems that it has been through and how to<br />
avoid them in the future.<br />
Lord Avebury: My Lords, the Minister mentioned<br />
the commitment that the Secretary-General received<br />
when he was in Sri Lanka that 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> the IDPs<br />
would be returned to their homes by the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
year. How does he think that the many different<br />
agencies that are involved in Sri Lanka can be co-ordinated<br />
to ensure that the right balance exists between returning<br />
people to their homes and improving the appalling<br />
conditions in the camps? Does he think that the entitled<br />
donors have any role in securing the political settlement<br />
that he just mentioned?