house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1159 Political Parties and Elections Bill [LORDS] Political Parties and Elections Bill 1160<br />
by each individual ERO. Accordingly, this amendment<br />
takes a power to amend Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Juries Act to<br />
provide for this, but it would not allow anyone who is<br />
not already entitled to access the register from EROs<br />
to do so from the CORE keeper.<br />
Finally, Amendment 88 extends the Secretary <strong>of</strong><br />
State’s existing powers in relation to the CORE scheme<br />
order so that the order can authorise information<br />
sharing between the CORE keeper and the Electoral<br />
Commission. As I have already detailed, the original<br />
intention was for the Electoral Commission to be the<br />
CORE keeper. However, now that this is not to be the<br />
case, it is important that the CORE keeper is able to<br />
furnish the commission with information that is relevant<br />
to its functions. It is envisaged that the power may be<br />
exercised to enable the CORE keeper to provide the<br />
Electoral Commission with statistical <strong>report</strong>s, for example,<br />
regarding registration patterns or the number <strong>of</strong><br />
notifications made by the CORE keeper to EROs<br />
about circumstances that may be indicative <strong>of</strong> absent<br />
voter fraud or other improprieties. The power may<br />
also be used to enable the CORE keeper to inform the<br />
commission where an ERO has failed to <strong>report</strong> back<br />
to the CORE keeper on steps taken to investigate<br />
potential instances <strong>of</strong> fraud or other improprieties, as<br />
may be required in the CORE scheme order. I beg<br />
to move.<br />
Amendment 85 agreed.<br />
Clause 25 : CORE information and action to be taken<br />
by electoral registration <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />
Amendments 86 to 88<br />
Moved by Lord Bach<br />
86: Clause 25, page 26, line 6, at end insert—<br />
“( ) At the end <strong>of</strong> subsection (3) there is inserted—<br />
“Modifications under this subsection may, in particular,<br />
provide for the supply <strong>of</strong> material by a CORE keeper to<br />
be subject to conditions or restrictions which do not<br />
apply in the case <strong>of</strong> an ERO (or which differ from those<br />
that apply in the case <strong>of</strong> an ERO).””<br />
87: Clause 25, page 26, line 6, at end insert—<br />
“( ) After subsection (4) there is inserted—<br />
“(4A) A CORE scheme may amend section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Juries<br />
Act 1974 (electoral register as basis <strong>of</strong> jury selection)—<br />
(a) so as to require a CORE keeper to supply a designated<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer with any documents or information referred to in<br />
that section (as it had effect immediately before the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> the scheme), and to make provision as<br />
to when the CORE keeper is to do so;<br />
(b) so as to require an ERO to supply a designated <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
with any such documents or information, but only when<br />
requested to do so by the <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />
In this subsection “designated <strong>of</strong>ficer” means an <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
designated by the Lord Chancellor.””<br />
88: Clause 25, page 26, line 30, at end insert—<br />
“( ) After that subsection there is inserted—<br />
“(11A) A CORE scheme may authorise the CORE keeper to<br />
supply information to the Electoral Commission.””<br />
Amendments 86 to 88 agreed.<br />
Clause 26 : Voluntary provision <strong>of</strong> identifying<br />
information<br />
Amendment 89<br />
Moved by Lord Bach<br />
89: Clause 26, page 27, line 20, leave out subsection (7)<br />
Lord Bach: My Lords, the Government have tabled a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> amendments to the individual registration<br />
clauses. Many <strong>of</strong> these, with the exception <strong>of</strong> Amendments<br />
90, 91, 92, 99, 100, 101, 114 and 117, are minor<br />
technical changes that tidy up the way that these<br />
clauses are intended to work and I do not propose to<br />
say anything about them. There are also a small number<br />
<strong>of</strong> more significant changes that I will describe shortly.<br />
I do not think that I need to go into detail at this hour<br />
about the importance <strong>of</strong> the shift to individual registration,<br />
which as a principle I know has the support <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
main parties in the House. It marks a significant point<br />
in the evolution <strong>of</strong> our electoral registration processes<br />
in Great Britain.<br />
I wish to mention briefly five changes. The first<br />
concerns Amendment 90, which amends Clause 27(2)(d)<br />
to broaden the purposes for which EROs can check<br />
information provided from the national insurance number<br />
(NINO) database during the voluntary phase <strong>of</strong> individual<br />
registration. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this amendment is to give<br />
EROs more flexibility in using data from the NINO<br />
database, while also ensuring that data are used only<br />
for appropriate purposes relating to checking a person’s<br />
entitlement to vote.<br />
Amendment 91 provides for the disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />
information by the CORE keeper to a registration<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer for the purposes <strong>of</strong> registration. Amendment 101<br />
introduces a requirement for registration <strong>of</strong>ficers to<br />
provide assistance to the Electoral Commission for<br />
the purpose <strong>of</strong> compiling their <strong>report</strong>s, and thus is<br />
very close to what the Official Opposition are looking<br />
for in their Amendment 96. In practice this is likely to<br />
cover the provision <strong>of</strong> information that the commission<br />
is likely to require. The Electoral Commission specifically<br />
asked if we might include this requirement in our<br />
legislation.<br />
Amendments 99 and 100 make a number <strong>of</strong><br />
amendments to the steps the Secretary <strong>of</strong> State needs<br />
to take in the event that there is not a positive endorsement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the shift to individual registration in 2014 by either<br />
the Electoral Commission or <strong>Parliament</strong>. If noble<br />
Lords require more detail on those amendments, I<br />
shall be happy to give them that information. Those<br />
are the government amendments in short. I shall now<br />
sit down as I know that there are opposition amendments<br />
in this group. I beg to move.<br />
Lord Henley: My Lords, I am grateful to the noble<br />
Lord for explaining the government amendments. I<br />
wish to comment briefly on the two amendments in<br />
my name and that <strong>of</strong> my noble friend Lord Bates, and<br />
on Amendment 98, to which I imagine the noble Lord,<br />
Lord Tyler, will want to speak, and which my noble<br />
friend and I also support.<br />
As regards Amendments 96 and 97, in light <strong>of</strong> what<br />
the noble Lord said about achieving most <strong>of</strong> what we<br />
were trying to do in those amendments, and in view <strong>of</strong>