house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WA 207 Written Answers<br />
[17 JUNE 2009]<br />
Written Answers<br />
WA 208<br />
Written Answers<br />
Wednesday 17 June 2009<br />
Afghanistan<br />
Question<br />
Asked by Lord Morris <strong>of</strong> Aberavon<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the<br />
estimated cost <strong>of</strong> the war in Afghanistan to date.<br />
[HL4144]<br />
The Minister for International Defence and Security<br />
(Baroness Taylor <strong>of</strong> Bolton): MoD identifies the costs<br />
<strong>of</strong> operations in terms <strong>of</strong> the net additional costs it<br />
has incurred. The costs that would have been incurred<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> the operation taking place, such as wages<br />
and salaries, are not included. Savings on activities<br />
that have not occurred because <strong>of</strong> the operation—such<br />
as training exercises—are taken into account in arriving<br />
at the net figures.<br />
The total annual costs <strong>of</strong> operations in Afghanistan<br />
since 2001 are set out below:<br />
2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09*<br />
Total to<br />
Date*<br />
Resource Costs<br />
187 236 36 58 148 560 1,071 1,656 3,952<br />
(£M)<br />
Capital Costs (£M) 34 75 10 9 51 178 433 967 1,757<br />
Total (£M) 221 311 46 67 199 738 1,504 2,623 5,709<br />
Note: The figures for 2008-09 are provisional outturn figures that are subject to final audit.<br />
Our forecast cost for operations for 2009-10 will be<br />
published in main estimates shortly.<br />
Benefits: Uprating<br />
Question<br />
Asked by Lord Laird<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much<br />
extra monies in (a) social security benefits, and<br />
(b) public sector pensions, are forecast to be paid in<br />
the financial year 2009–10 to take account <strong>of</strong> the<br />
5 per cent and 6.3 per cent inflationary upratings<br />
determined by the prices indices <strong>of</strong> September 2008.<br />
[HL3627]<br />
The Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury<br />
(Lord Myners): My right honourable friend the Minister<br />
for Pensions and the Ageing Society provided an<br />
estimate <strong>of</strong> the costs <strong>of</strong> uprating DWP social security<br />
benefits at the appropriate rates in 2009-10 on 12 February<br />
2009 (House <strong>of</strong> Commons, Official Report, col. 1545).<br />
The Government do not hold detailed costings for<br />
indexation in respect <strong>of</strong> the full range <strong>of</strong> public sector<br />
pension schemes, but the overall cost <strong>of</strong> the 5 per cent<br />
uprating in 2009-10 has been estimated at around one<br />
and a quarter billion pounds.<br />
Community Empowerment, Housing and<br />
Economic Regeneration<br />
Questions<br />
Asked by Baroness Hamwee<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />
Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 7 May<br />
(WA 134), what criteria were applied in deciding<br />
whether further changes in policy and practice discussed<br />
in the White Paper Communities in Control required<br />
legislation.<br />
[HL4049]<br />
The <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Under-Secretary <strong>of</strong> State,<br />
Department for Communities and Local Government &<br />
Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie <strong>of</strong><br />
Luton): Government can promote changes in the policies<br />
and practices <strong>of</strong> external bodies through a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
means, such as legislation, the provision <strong>of</strong> funding<br />
information or guidance, by piloting initiatives, and by<br />
spreading best practice. The assessment <strong>of</strong> the best<br />
means in any circumstances is carried out on a case by<br />
case basis.<br />
Asked by Baroness Hamwee<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />
Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 7 May<br />
(WA 134), on what grounds they have decided not<br />
to take forward “a number <strong>of</strong> more minor proposals,<br />
namely on remote attendance and voting by councillors,<br />
payments for councillors on loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice, and<br />
incentives to vote in local elections”. [HL4050]<br />
Lord McKenzie <strong>of</strong> Luton: Most <strong>of</strong> the proposals for<br />
change in the White Paper Communities in Control do<br />
not require legislation. For those where legislation is<br />
required, the Local Democracy, Economic Development<br />
and Construction Bill, which is currently before<br />
<strong>Parliament</strong>, contains the major provisions, including a<br />
number added since introduction.<br />
Given the stage <strong>of</strong> the parliamentary cycle, we have<br />
decided to concentrate our energy on this, and not to<br />
publish a Draft Community Empowerment Bill, which<br />
would have contained only a few more minor proposals.<br />
Substantial progress has been made since Communities<br />
in Control was published. We published a “Communities<br />
Progress Report” on 1 June. Copies are in the Libraries<br />
<strong>of</strong> the House.<br />
Asked by Baroness Hamwee<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />
Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 7 May<br />
(WA 134), what the remaining proposals are which<br />
require legislation, in addition to any legislation