04.06.2014 Views

house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament

house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament

house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WA 207 Written Answers<br />

[17 JUNE 2009]<br />

Written Answers<br />

WA 208<br />

Written Answers<br />

Wednesday 17 June 2009<br />

Afghanistan<br />

Question<br />

Asked by Lord Morris <strong>of</strong> Aberavon<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the<br />

estimated cost <strong>of</strong> the war in Afghanistan to date.<br />

[HL4144]<br />

The Minister for International Defence and Security<br />

(Baroness Taylor <strong>of</strong> Bolton): MoD identifies the costs<br />

<strong>of</strong> operations in terms <strong>of</strong> the net additional costs it<br />

has incurred. The costs that would have been incurred<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> the operation taking place, such as wages<br />

and salaries, are not included. Savings on activities<br />

that have not occurred because <strong>of</strong> the operation—such<br />

as training exercises—are taken into account in arriving<br />

at the net figures.<br />

The total annual costs <strong>of</strong> operations in Afghanistan<br />

since 2001 are set out below:<br />

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09*<br />

Total to<br />

Date*<br />

Resource Costs<br />

187 236 36 58 148 560 1,071 1,656 3,952<br />

(£M)<br />

Capital Costs (£M) 34 75 10 9 51 178 433 967 1,757<br />

Total (£M) 221 311 46 67 199 738 1,504 2,623 5,709<br />

Note: The figures for 2008-09 are provisional outturn figures that are subject to final audit.<br />

Our forecast cost for operations for 2009-10 will be<br />

published in main estimates shortly.<br />

Benefits: Uprating<br />

Question<br />

Asked by Lord Laird<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how much<br />

extra monies in (a) social security benefits, and<br />

(b) public sector pensions, are forecast to be paid in<br />

the financial year 2009–10 to take account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

5 per cent and 6.3 per cent inflationary upratings<br />

determined by the prices indices <strong>of</strong> September 2008.<br />

[HL3627]<br />

The Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury<br />

(Lord Myners): My right honourable friend the Minister<br />

for Pensions and the Ageing Society provided an<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> the costs <strong>of</strong> uprating DWP social security<br />

benefits at the appropriate rates in 2009-10 on 12 February<br />

2009 (House <strong>of</strong> Commons, Official Report, col. 1545).<br />

The Government do not hold detailed costings for<br />

indexation in respect <strong>of</strong> the full range <strong>of</strong> public sector<br />

pension schemes, but the overall cost <strong>of</strong> the 5 per cent<br />

uprating in 2009-10 has been estimated at around one<br />

and a quarter billion pounds.<br />

Community Empowerment, Housing and<br />

Economic Regeneration<br />

Questions<br />

Asked by Baroness Hamwee<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />

Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 7 May<br />

(WA 134), what criteria were applied in deciding<br />

whether further changes in policy and practice discussed<br />

in the White Paper Communities in Control required<br />

legislation.<br />

[HL4049]<br />

The <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Under-Secretary <strong>of</strong> State,<br />

Department for Communities and Local Government &<br />

Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie <strong>of</strong><br />

Luton): Government can promote changes in the policies<br />

and practices <strong>of</strong> external bodies through a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

means, such as legislation, the provision <strong>of</strong> funding<br />

information or guidance, by piloting initiatives, and by<br />

spreading best practice. The assessment <strong>of</strong> the best<br />

means in any circumstances is carried out on a case by<br />

case basis.<br />

Asked by Baroness Hamwee<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />

Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 7 May<br />

(WA 134), on what grounds they have decided not<br />

to take forward “a number <strong>of</strong> more minor proposals,<br />

namely on remote attendance and voting by councillors,<br />

payments for councillors on loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice, and<br />

incentives to vote in local elections”. [HL4050]<br />

Lord McKenzie <strong>of</strong> Luton: Most <strong>of</strong> the proposals for<br />

change in the White Paper Communities in Control do<br />

not require legislation. For those where legislation is<br />

required, the Local Democracy, Economic Development<br />

and Construction Bill, which is currently before<br />

<strong>Parliament</strong>, contains the major provisions, including a<br />

number added since introduction.<br />

Given the stage <strong>of</strong> the parliamentary cycle, we have<br />

decided to concentrate our energy on this, and not to<br />

publish a Draft Community Empowerment Bill, which<br />

would have contained only a few more minor proposals.<br />

Substantial progress has been made since Communities<br />

in Control was published. We published a “Communities<br />

Progress Report” on 1 June. Copies are in the Libraries<br />

<strong>of</strong> the House.<br />

Asked by Baroness Hamwee<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />

Written Answer by Baroness Andrews on 7 May<br />

(WA 134), what the remaining proposals are which<br />

require legislation, in addition to any legislation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!