04.06.2014 Views

house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament

house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament

house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WA 215 Written Answers<br />

[17 JUNE 2009]<br />

Written Answers<br />

WA 216<br />

Population Statistics<br />

Question<br />

Asked by Lord Taylor <strong>of</strong> Holbeach<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they<br />

supply the <strong>United</strong> States Census Bureau with <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>Kingdom</strong> population statistics; and, if so, in what<br />

form and how frequently.<br />

[HL4053]<br />

Baroness Crawley: The information requested falls<br />

within the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the UK Statistics Authority.<br />

I have asked the authority to reply<br />

Letter from Karen Dunnell, National Statistician, to<br />

Lord Taylor, dated June 2009.<br />

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply<br />

to your Question asking whether Her Majesty’s<br />

Government supply the <strong>United</strong> States Census Bureau<br />

with <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> population statistics; and, if so,<br />

in what form and how frequently. (HL4053)<br />

Population statistics are published on the ONS<br />

website where they are available publicly for all users<br />

at www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=<br />

601&More=N.<br />

No other Census or other population statistics are<br />

supplied to the <strong>United</strong> States Census Bureau.<br />

Public Bodies<br />

Question<br />

Asked by Lord Laird<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what recourse<br />

they have if a body set up by an Act <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong><br />

exceeds its brief.<br />

[HL3544]<br />

The Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the Duchy <strong>of</strong> Lancaster (Baroness<br />

Royall <strong>of</strong> Blaisdon): There are a wide range <strong>of</strong> public<br />

bodies set up by Acts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>. Any concerns<br />

about the actions or performance <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

public body should be raised with the chairman <strong>of</strong> the<br />

body concerned and/or the relevant sponsor department.<br />

Public Sector: Contracts<br />

Question<br />

Asked by Lord Kirkwood <strong>of</strong> Kirkhope<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what measures<br />

are in place in the process for tendering public<br />

sector contracts to protect local specialist providers<br />

<strong>of</strong> services from exploitation by prime contractors.<br />

[HL4103]<br />

The Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury<br />

(Lord Myners): The Office <strong>of</strong> Government Commerce<br />

has issued guidance which encourages departments to<br />

seek effective management <strong>of</strong> supply chains by their<br />

prime contractors.<br />

This guidance will be reviewed and updated as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a programme <strong>of</strong> work to implement the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Glover Advisory Committee,<br />

which published its <strong>report</strong> Accelerating the SME economic<br />

engine; through transparent, simple and strategic<br />

procurement in November 2008. That work includes a<br />

project to help ensure small businesses and other firms<br />

acting as sub-contractors obtain contract conditions,<br />

for example, promptness <strong>of</strong> payment, that are comparable<br />

to those applied to the prime contractor.<br />

Within central government it is mandatory for major<br />

new construction projects to adopt the principles set<br />

out in OGC’s Guide to Best Fair Payment practices.<br />

That requires departments to adopt the principles <strong>of</strong><br />

OGC’s Fair Payment Charter for their construction<br />

supply chains.<br />

Questions for Written Answer: Websites<br />

Question<br />

Asked by Lord Laird<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government why they<br />

refer to websites to answer parliamentary questions<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> supplying the information, and whether<br />

they will ensure that in future answers are provided<br />

in full in the Official Report.<br />

[HL4003]<br />

The Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the Duchy <strong>of</strong> Lancaster (Baroness<br />

Royall <strong>of</strong> Blaisdon): The presumption should be that,<br />

unless it is <strong>of</strong> such size and complexity that it would<br />

not be practicable to do so or would involve<br />

disproportionate cost, requested information which is<br />

readily available should be provided in the relevant<br />

Written Answer itself, in addition to referring the<br />

Member to the published sources. I will be reminding<br />

departments <strong>of</strong> the need to do so.<br />

Shipping: Ferry Operators<br />

Questions<br />

Asked by Lord Laird<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />

Written Answer by Lord Adonis on 9 June (WA 147-8),<br />

whether the agency issued a temporary passengercarrying<br />

certificate on or about 12 September 2008<br />

for MV “CANNA”.<br />

[HL4221]<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />

Written Answer by Lord Adonis on 9 June (WA 147-8),<br />

whether a temporary passenger-carrying certificate<br />

was requested from the agency on or about 5 September<br />

2008 for MV “CANNA”. [HL4223]<br />

To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />

Written Answer by Lord Adonis on 9 June (WA 147-8),<br />

what was meant by “had the MCA issued the<br />

correct paperwork, the passenger certificate would<br />

have been valid for a full year through to 18 September<br />

2008”. [HL4226]<br />

The Secretary <strong>of</strong> State for Transport (Lord Adonis):<br />

The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) issued<br />

a short-term passenger certificate, valid for one month,<br />

for the MV “CANNA”on 12 September 2008, following<br />

an in water survey. No request was made to the MCA<br />

for a temporary passenger-carrying certificate in<br />

September 2008.<br />

An error occurred in the re-issue <strong>of</strong> passenger<br />

certification in July 2008 to take account <strong>of</strong> a change<br />

<strong>of</strong> operator to the current operator. This certification<br />

should have reflected previous changes, unrelated to<br />

the current operator, which would have confirmed<br />

that the certification was valid until 18 September<br />

2008, rather than 31 August 2008.<br />

On 5 September 2008 the operators <strong>of</strong> the<br />

MV “CANNA” informed the MCA that the vessel<br />

could not be surveyed out <strong>of</strong> water before 18 September

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!