house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
house of lords official report - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
WA 215 Written Answers<br />
[17 JUNE 2009]<br />
Written Answers<br />
WA 216<br />
Population Statistics<br />
Question<br />
Asked by Lord Taylor <strong>of</strong> Holbeach<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they<br />
supply the <strong>United</strong> States Census Bureau with <strong>United</strong><br />
<strong>Kingdom</strong> population statistics; and, if so, in what<br />
form and how frequently.<br />
[HL4053]<br />
Baroness Crawley: The information requested falls<br />
within the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the UK Statistics Authority.<br />
I have asked the authority to reply<br />
Letter from Karen Dunnell, National Statistician, to<br />
Lord Taylor, dated June 2009.<br />
As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply<br />
to your Question asking whether Her Majesty’s<br />
Government supply the <strong>United</strong> States Census Bureau<br />
with <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> population statistics; and, if so,<br />
in what form and how frequently. (HL4053)<br />
Population statistics are published on the ONS<br />
website where they are available publicly for all users<br />
at www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=<br />
601&More=N.<br />
No other Census or other population statistics are<br />
supplied to the <strong>United</strong> States Census Bureau.<br />
Public Bodies<br />
Question<br />
Asked by Lord Laird<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what recourse<br />
they have if a body set up by an Act <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong><br />
exceeds its brief.<br />
[HL3544]<br />
The Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the Duchy <strong>of</strong> Lancaster (Baroness<br />
Royall <strong>of</strong> Blaisdon): There are a wide range <strong>of</strong> public<br />
bodies set up by Acts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>. Any concerns<br />
about the actions or performance <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />
public body should be raised with the chairman <strong>of</strong> the<br />
body concerned and/or the relevant sponsor department.<br />
Public Sector: Contracts<br />
Question<br />
Asked by Lord Kirkwood <strong>of</strong> Kirkhope<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what measures<br />
are in place in the process for tendering public<br />
sector contracts to protect local specialist providers<br />
<strong>of</strong> services from exploitation by prime contractors.<br />
[HL4103]<br />
The Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury<br />
(Lord Myners): The Office <strong>of</strong> Government Commerce<br />
has issued guidance which encourages departments to<br />
seek effective management <strong>of</strong> supply chains by their<br />
prime contractors.<br />
This guidance will be reviewed and updated as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> a programme <strong>of</strong> work to implement the<br />
recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Glover Advisory Committee,<br />
which published its <strong>report</strong> Accelerating the SME economic<br />
engine; through transparent, simple and strategic<br />
procurement in November 2008. That work includes a<br />
project to help ensure small businesses and other firms<br />
acting as sub-contractors obtain contract conditions,<br />
for example, promptness <strong>of</strong> payment, that are comparable<br />
to those applied to the prime contractor.<br />
Within central government it is mandatory for major<br />
new construction projects to adopt the principles set<br />
out in OGC’s Guide to Best Fair Payment practices.<br />
That requires departments to adopt the principles <strong>of</strong><br />
OGC’s Fair Payment Charter for their construction<br />
supply chains.<br />
Questions for Written Answer: Websites<br />
Question<br />
Asked by Lord Laird<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government why they<br />
refer to websites to answer parliamentary questions<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> supplying the information, and whether<br />
they will ensure that in future answers are provided<br />
in full in the Official Report.<br />
[HL4003]<br />
The Chancellor <strong>of</strong> the Duchy <strong>of</strong> Lancaster (Baroness<br />
Royall <strong>of</strong> Blaisdon): The presumption should be that,<br />
unless it is <strong>of</strong> such size and complexity that it would<br />
not be practicable to do so or would involve<br />
disproportionate cost, requested information which is<br />
readily available should be provided in the relevant<br />
Written Answer itself, in addition to referring the<br />
Member to the published sources. I will be reminding<br />
departments <strong>of</strong> the need to do so.<br />
Shipping: Ferry Operators<br />
Questions<br />
Asked by Lord Laird<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />
Written Answer by Lord Adonis on 9 June (WA 147-8),<br />
whether the agency issued a temporary passengercarrying<br />
certificate on or about 12 September 2008<br />
for MV “CANNA”.<br />
[HL4221]<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />
Written Answer by Lord Adonis on 9 June (WA 147-8),<br />
whether a temporary passenger-carrying certificate<br />
was requested from the agency on or about 5 September<br />
2008 for MV “CANNA”. [HL4223]<br />
To ask Her Majesty’s Government further to the<br />
Written Answer by Lord Adonis on 9 June (WA 147-8),<br />
what was meant by “had the MCA issued the<br />
correct paperwork, the passenger certificate would<br />
have been valid for a full year through to 18 September<br />
2008”. [HL4226]<br />
The Secretary <strong>of</strong> State for Transport (Lord Adonis):<br />
The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) issued<br />
a short-term passenger certificate, valid for one month,<br />
for the MV “CANNA”on 12 September 2008, following<br />
an in water survey. No request was made to the MCA<br />
for a temporary passenger-carrying certificate in<br />
September 2008.<br />
An error occurred in the re-issue <strong>of</strong> passenger<br />
certification in July 2008 to take account <strong>of</strong> a change<br />
<strong>of</strong> operator to the current operator. This certification<br />
should have reflected previous changes, unrelated to<br />
the current operator, which would have confirmed<br />
that the certification was valid until 18 September<br />
2008, rather than 31 August 2008.<br />
On 5 September 2008 the operators <strong>of</strong> the<br />
MV “CANNA” informed the MCA that the vessel<br />
could not be surveyed out <strong>of</strong> water before 18 September