11.06.2014 Views

Download file, English (1 MB PDF) - RHO

Download file, English (1 MB PDF) - RHO

Download file, English (1 MB PDF) - RHO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Malawi<br />

Zambia<br />

• Involve policymakers (parliamentarians).<br />

• Financial resources for new technologies (i.e., HPV DNA testing at point of care, vaccine).<br />

• Training and education.<br />

• Screening—VIA/cytology/DNA/colposcopy (pilot studies and full-scale rollout).<br />

• Screening and management of treatment, including palliative care.<br />

• Strengthen the referral system.<br />

• HPV vaccination.<br />

• Country-wide campaigns promoting cervical cancer prevention.<br />

• National expansion of screening; integrate HPV DNA testing into screening programs.<br />

• Establish HPV vaccination program.<br />

Group 3: Cameroon, Ghana, and Rwanda<br />

Common challenges across countries in this group included:<br />

• The cervical cancer burden is not accurately known.<br />

• Current cervical cancer prevention policies are not comprehensive.<br />

• Low possibility of government financing for strengthening screening services or for HPV<br />

vaccination.<br />

• Cancer control is generally neglected as part of the non-communicable disease agenda.<br />

• Lack of awareness of cervical cancer among clinicians and patients.<br />

• Lack of equipment for screening and treatment.<br />

• Women have a fear of being screened.<br />

• Sustainability of the cervical cancer prevention program.<br />

• Low capacity for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions and palliative care.<br />

As with the other groups, coordination of activities for cervical cancer prevention across reproductive<br />

health, cancer, and immunization was a central concern. Here, the teams suggested the creation of a<br />

national technical committee to coordinate activities across service providers. The committee would<br />

decide which group would do vaccination, screening, and other activities. At the outset, it seems logical<br />

that EPI would be in charge of vaccinations, since this group has expertise in immunizations.<br />

Another question was how to coordinate cervical cancer screening with HIV programs. Adding screening<br />

to the HIV programs may stigmatize those getting cervical cancer screening, so it may work better to<br />

have screening clinics that also offer other services, such as HIV testing, family planning, and nutritional<br />

Report of an African Regional Meeting on Cervical Cancer: September 2010 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!