Chapter 4 - Warnings - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission
Chapter 4 - Warnings - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission
Chapter 4 - Warnings - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Warnings</strong><br />
4.199 The South Australian CFS uses SEWS whenever lives are at threat or when a fire is burning out of control<br />
on a very high to extreme fire danger day. 252 SEWS precedes each bushfire warning message. Mr Lawson<br />
explained that an education program was implemented prior to the re-introduction of SEWS. He was asked<br />
whether, since the changes to the warning system were introduced in May 2005, the CFS had received<br />
feedback about the use of SEWS, including any suggestions of irritation, confusion or panic. Mr Lawson<br />
indicated the following:<br />
We have received feedback from very small numbers of communities saying that it raises their level of<br />
awareness unduly, that we have used the signal when the fire didn’t pose the threat that they believed<br />
it should have as a result of using the warning, but we continued to use the SEWS warning. 253<br />
4.200<br />
When asked why the CFS continues to use the warning in the face of such criticism, Mr Lawson stated<br />
the following:<br />
We take that view that we have made that decision to use the SEWS, and until we have strong evidence<br />
to the contrary that suggests it does in fact provide confusion to the community, then we will continue to<br />
use the SEWS. 254<br />
4.201 Professor Handmer suggests that SEWS can be useful: ‘warnings to me operate in a competitive<br />
environment often with everything else people are doing or listening to, and there is often, not always,<br />
but often needs to be some way of cutting through all the haze and the idea of SEWS is to do that’. 255<br />
Mr Esplin said that he would prefer SEWS to remain available as a tool for the control agencies to use<br />
‘if they believe it will materially assist the delivery of messaging to the community’. 256<br />
4.202 The State and the ABC expressed concerns during the hearing that the introduction of a protocol for the use<br />
of SEWS may lead to irritation or confusion in the community. 257 However, it has been possible to overcome<br />
these issues in South Australia, as Mr Lawson outlined, by disaggregating the broadcasting network and<br />
issuing warning and information messages to specific communities through the regional radio system. 258<br />
4.203 The concerns expressed about the use of SEWS may be addressed by various means, including adopting<br />
a sensible approach to a new protocol for its use. This could include:<br />
■■<br />
■■<br />
grouping bushfire warnings that require the use of SEWS<br />
reducing the length of time SEWS is played when used multiple times<br />
■■ disaggregating ABC broadcasts on occasions when multiple fires are threatening different parts<br />
of the State<br />
■■ arrangements concerning the number of times particular warnings are repeated.<br />
4.204 Professor Handmer indicated that, in his view, SEWS could be introduced to the <strong>Victorian</strong> community<br />
before the next fire season. 259<br />
4.205 In light of this discussion, it appears likely that a reintroduction of SEWS, accompanied by appropriate<br />
education, could indeed be achieved prior to the next fire season. Of course, its reintroduction must be<br />
accompanied by education on its purpose. 260 Further, any concerns about the effects of overuse of SEWS<br />
could be addressed by the ABC, CFA and DSE implementing a protocol for a streamlined process for the<br />
use of SEWS on ABC Radio and television.<br />
147