25.06.2014 Views

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monday, May 13th<br />

Tuesday, May 14th<br />

Wednesday, May 15th<br />

Thursday, May 16th<br />

a positive direction due to implementing more strict NOx regulations<br />

and by setting more strict fuel sulphur limits, which certainly<br />

has an effect on emitted levels of SOx and particulates. Although,<br />

can be explained by high content of metallic ash compounds (in<br />

heavy fuel oil) acting as a catalyst and hence enhancing the process<br />

of soot oxidation.<br />

it should be stated that future dramatic reduction of sulphur content<br />

may result in limited availability of low-sulphur marine fuels,<br />

so their potential alternatives (substitutes) should be defined and Monday May 13th / 15:30 – 17:00<br />

Room D<br />

thoroughly investigated in advance. In this study different alternative<br />

Tribology 2<br />

marine fuels including both biodiesel (fish oil, FO) and syn-<br />

thetic diesel (GTL) have been tested in a medium-speed marine Novel trends in journal slide bearing technology -<br />

diesel engine and fuel ignition analyser (FIA) to compare their active use of tribochemical effects<br />

ignition, combustion and emission characteristics in contrast to Martin Offenbecher, Miba Bearing Group, Austria<br />

reference low-sulphur marine gas oil (MGO) and heavy fuel oil<br />

Hellen Li, Miba Bearing Group, Jiangsu Province, China<br />

(HFO). Experiments were performed at various operating conditions<br />

under standard four-mode propeller curve marine cycle with<br />

engine performance, exhaust emissions together with particulate<br />

matter (PM) size distributions and corresponding total particle<br />

number and mass concentrations being measured and compared<br />

at each load point. GTL fuel was found to have the highest cetane<br />

number, hence the shortest ignition delay among the tested fuels<br />

Emmanuel Laine, Infineum International Ltd, UK<br />

Florian Gruen, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria<br />

Kartik Pondicherry, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria<br />

Future trends in engine design go towards higher firing pressures,<br />

which further increase the tribo-mechanical loading of<br />

and simultaneously provided 1 to 2%<br />

higher shaft efficiency compared with reference<br />

HFO. In general, MGO, GTL and<br />

FO showed a rather similar combustion<br />

performance in terms of both cylinder<br />

pressure and rate of heat release, which<br />

was distinctively different from that of<br />

high-sulphur heavy fuel oil. Both MGO<br />

and GTL showed a very similar behaviour<br />

in terms of gaseous emissions (comparing<br />

with that of HFO) with NOx and<br />

CO 2<br />

concentrations being decreased,<br />

HC levels being increased and CO emissions<br />

showing some variation depending<br />

on actual load conditions. FO, in its<br />

turn, allows reducing emitted CO 2<br />

, CO<br />

and HC concentrations, but NOx levels<br />

were slightly increased. All the effects are<br />

likely associated with the alternative fuels<br />

chemical composition and physical<br />

properties, e.g. lower levels of sulphur,<br />

ash and aromatics, higher cetane number<br />

and oxygen content (for FO) in fuel. All<br />

these factors are believed to be also important<br />

in explaining pronounced PM<br />

reduction, both in terms of PM mass and<br />

total number concentrations, that was Is your engine safe?<br />

observed from MGO, GTL and FO. The<br />

highest positive effect was found from<br />

FO with more than 75% of PM mass reduction<br />

(mainly related to reduction in<br />

Wherever oil mist or gas mixtures are generated, dangerous explosions<br />

number of big carbonaceous particles) with serious consequences can occur at any time. HOERBIGER explosion<br />

and is likely associated with its high content<br />

relief valves offer optimum protection for personnel and equipment.<br />

of fuel-embedded oxygen. The regis-<br />

n Flameless pressure relief<br />

tered particle size distributions were fairly<br />

bimodal for MGO, GTL and FO with<br />

n Designed for multiple explosions<br />

pronounced carbonaceous accumulation n Keeps your engine running<br />

mode and nucleation mode composed n Virtually maintenance free<br />

of ash compounds and originating from<br />

high lube oil emissions with the nucleation<br />

for semivolatile compounds is believed<br />

to occur via heterogeneous nucleation<br />

For more information:<br />

sales.ev@hoerbiger.com<br />

process. Particle size distributions<br />

were unimodal (actually contained two<br />

overlapping modes) from HFO fuel and<br />

showed somewhat lower concentrations<br />

Safety excellence for diesel, gas and<br />

dual fuel engines.<br />

of big carbonaceous particles, which<br />

www.hoerbiger.com<br />

Ship & Offshore Container 2013.indd 1 10.01.13 11:39<br />

May 2013 | Schiff&Hafen | Ship&Offshore SPECIAL 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!