25.06.2014 Views

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Monday, May 13th<br />

Tuesday, May 14th<br />

Wednesday, May 15th<br />

Thursday, May 16th<br />

is calculated by Dent’s formula, whose input is spray pe<strong>net</strong>ration<br />

experimentally linked with engine out emission. In order to verify<br />

the concept of converted injection pressure, two different engines<br />

are analysed in this study. At first, a natural aspirated engine with<br />

a common rail injection system with a maximum of 1,600 bar is<br />

applied for building soot and NOx estimation models. In this engine<br />

test, a wide range of emission data is obtained under the various<br />

conditions of excess air ratio and pressure difference between<br />

injection and in-cylinder gas. The result shows good relationship<br />

between converted injection pressure and measured soot. Using<br />

this relationship, a soot estimation model can be built and proposed.<br />

In terms of NOx, it has a good relationship with injection<br />

duration. An NOx estimation model has also been built based on<br />

injection duration. Next, a turbo charged engine with maximum<br />

2,000 bar injection common rail system is applied for evaluating<br />

this soot and NOx estimation model. It is found that relative<br />

changes of measured emissions follow estimated results. But there<br />

is a gap in their absolute value because of different combustion<br />

chamber shape and direction of nozzle hole axis. Thus, it is found<br />

that proposed soot and NOx estimation model is only effective<br />

for their relative change against increase in injection pressure. At<br />

last, a trend of the optimal nozzle dimensions accompanied with<br />

increase in injection pressure is calculated by using soot and NOx<br />

estimation models. The result shows that a higher injection pressure<br />

requires a larger number of nozzle holes and a smaller nozzle<br />

hole diameter.<br />

Development trend and optimised matching of fuel<br />

injection system of diesel engine<br />

Zongying Gao, Jiangsu University, China<br />

Bifeng Yin, Jiangsu University, China<br />

Shengji Liu, Jiangsu University, China<br />

Jianming Zhu, FAW Wuxi Fuel Injection Equipment Research Institute, China<br />

Yusheng Ju, FAW Wuxi Fuel Injection Equipment Research Institute, China<br />

Yong Hang, FAW Wuxi Fuel Injection Equipment Research Institute, China<br />

In the foreseeable future – though the dominating source of power<br />

– diesel engines are required to meet the increasingly stringent<br />

regulations of energy conservation and ultra-low emission. As<br />

the heart of diesel engines, the fuel-injection system is the core of<br />

various advanced combustion and emission control technologies<br />

of differently typed engines. As a consequence, the fuel-injection<br />

system tends to be with higher injection pressure and be flexible<br />

as well as controllable, and of which the electronic control high<br />

pressure common rail is considered to be the most potential fuel<br />

system. The common rail fuel injection system marked FCRS has<br />

been developed by The Wuxi Fuel Injection Equipment Institute,<br />

which belongs to The China FAW Group Corporation, and can<br />

provide a injection pressure of 180 MPa and achieve stable injection<br />

more than three times. It has already been applied to heavyduty<br />

diesel engines for vehicles and large-sized non-road diesel<br />

engines as well. The optimal match between the fuel injection<br />

system and the entire engine is the key in the developing process<br />

of diesel engines, which depends on the specifying and collaborative<br />

optimising and matching the properties in the aspects of time<br />

and space in order to obtain an effective and reasonable combustion<br />

process. Time matching needs to ensure that the fuel injection<br />

quantity meet the torque demand for different operating conditions<br />

of the diesel engine. In addition, the injection timing needs<br />

to be precise, stable and adjustable with the load and the speed,<br />

and the fuel injection duration must be appropriate. The injection<br />

pressure and injection rate should be high enough so that full use<br />

of the injection energy to boost the forming and combustion of<br />

the gas mixture can be made. The combination property can be<br />

improved for the emission of NOx and PM can be controlled by<br />

multi-injection and shape control of injection law whose character<br />

is quick after slow. Space matching of fuel system means the match<br />

between the spray and the space of the combustion chamber, and<br />

mixture of fuel and air can realise uniform mixing and complete<br />

combustion through a optimisation design of point of fall of statical<br />

fuel injection line on the wall of the combustion chamber. As<br />

for two-valve DI diesel engines, limited by the structure and the<br />

bulk of the combustion chamber, the influence of space matching<br />

on the combustion process is more obvious. Based on a serial<br />

CFD calculation and high-speed photography inside the chamber,<br />

put forward the design standard for statical fuel injection line distributed<br />

in the axial direction with equal proportion and in the<br />

circumferential direction with equal air-fuel ratio, which can trace<br />

back to the idea that get a better mixture of fuel and air and make<br />

sure a equal air-fuel ratio, lack of neither oxygen nor fuel, in any<br />

place of the chamber.<br />

Monday May 13th / 13:30 – 15:00<br />

Tribology 1<br />

Room D<br />

The benefit of using Group II base oils in mediumspeed<br />

engines<br />

Laura Gregory, Infineum, UK<br />

Group II base oils are a category of base oils defined by the<br />

American Petroleum Institute as having a sulphur content less<br />

than 300 ppm, a saturates content greater than 90% and a viscosity<br />

index of between 80 and 120. Group II base oils have been<br />

used in automotive lubricants for many years. This was driven<br />

by the need to improve performance of the lubricant to meet<br />

the demands of new engine technologies. As a consequence, the<br />

supply of Group II base oil has been increasing and the capacity<br />

of Group I base oil is forecast to decrease. So far, these trends<br />

in base oil capacity have left the lubricants for medium-speed<br />

marine engines unaffected; such lubricants have historically always<br />

used Group I base oils as the diluent for the additive system.<br />

With an increasing availability of Group II base oils, there<br />

is now a drive to utilise them for medium-speed marine engine<br />

applications. The current economic climate is a strong motivator<br />

for the shipowner/operator to scrutinise their operation and<br />

identify where further cost savings can be made. Hence there is a<br />

desire for reduced oil consumption and increased power output.<br />

Combine this with increasingly poor heavy fuel oil quality, to<br />

which medium-speed engines are sensitive, and it becomes clear<br />

that the demands on the lubricant are increasing. This paper discusses<br />

whether the use of Group II base oil can go some way<br />

to meeting those demands, by providing improved oxidation<br />

resistance, viscosity control and lower volatility. An upgrade of<br />

these performance features would extend the time before condemning<br />

limits for the oil are reached. The capability of these<br />

base oils in comparison to Group I is examined in bench and<br />

laboratory engine testing. The deployment of a Group II based<br />

lubricant in the field, and what benefits have been observed, is<br />

discussed.<br />

Cylinder liner and piston ring lubrication issues in<br />

relation to increase stroke/bore ratio<br />

Shinichi Miyake, Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding Co, Ltd, Japan<br />

Kazuo Harada, Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding Co, Ltd, Japan<br />

Mikio Kotake, Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding Co, Ltd, Japan<br />

Christian Lotz Felder, MAN Diesel & Turbo SE, Denmark<br />

Jesper Weis Fogh, MAN Diesel & Turbo SE, Denmark<br />

May 2013 | Schiff&Hafen | Ship&Offshore SPECIAL 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!