25.06.2014 Views

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cimac Congress | Shanghai 2013<br />

Thursday May 16th / 08:30 – 10:00<br />

Aftertreatment – SCR Experience<br />

Testing SCR in high-sulphur application<br />

Kati Lehtoranta, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />

Raimo Turunen, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />

Hannu Vesala, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />

Sami Nyyssoenen, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />

Niko Soikkeli, Wärtsilä Finland Oy, Finland<br />

Lucas Esselstroem, Wärtsilä Finland Oy, Finland<br />

Room C<br />

NOx and SOx emissions from ship exhausts are limited by IMO<br />

ship pollution rules. NOx emission limits are set for diesel engines<br />

depending on the engine maximum operating speed. Limits are set<br />

globally (Tier I and Tier II) and in addition for emission control<br />

areas (Tier III). Tier III standard is dated to 2016 and is expected to<br />

require the use of emission control technologies. SCR is an available<br />

technology capable of meeting this requirement. This technology<br />

uses a catalyst and ammonia for the reduction of NOx to<br />

elemental nitrogen. On the other hand, SOx limits require the use<br />

of lower sulphur level fuels or aftertreatment systems, like scrubbers,<br />

to decrease SOx emissions. Scrubbers might become popular<br />

as they allow the use of inexpensive heavy fuel oil. The sulphur is<br />

usually considered as poison to catalysts. In SCRs, a V2O5 catalyst<br />

has been widely employed due to its high activity and sulphur tolerance.<br />

Even so, sulphur-related challenges do occur. At high temperatures,<br />

the SO3 can result in an unwanted visible plume, while<br />

at low temperatures, the SO3 can react with the ammonia to form<br />

ammonium sulphates, which deposit on and foul the catalyst. This<br />

brings certain requirements for the SCR optimisation in high sulphur<br />

applications. Ships utilise large engines, which require large<br />

catalyst volumes to deal with the emissions. Installations to large<br />

engine applications can be difficult and testing rather complex.<br />

Only minor (or none) tuning of the parameters is possible in real<br />

applications. In this study, a slipstream emission control test bench<br />

is utilised to test smaller SCR units with a proper exhaust gas from<br />

a medium-speed diesel engine. The test bench has an advantage<br />

of easily tuned and controlled parameters (like temperature and<br />

exhaust flow). A heavy fuel oil with a sulphur content of 2.5% is<br />

utilised as test fuel. Two different SCR catalysts with a volume of<br />

40dm3 are tested using engine loads of 100%, 75% and 50%. In addition,<br />

different exhaust gas flow rates and temperatures, adjusted<br />

by the test bench, are utilised in testing. The test bench utilises NOx<br />

sensors placed upstream and downstream of the test SCR reactor.<br />

In addition, the standard analyser to measure the NOx (chemiluminescence)<br />

was in use. FTIR was used to measure the NH3. Hydrocarbons,<br />

carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide were measured<br />

as well. The effect of SCR on particle emissions was studied by collecting<br />

particles on filters both before and after the catalyst. The<br />

particle filters were further analysed for sulphates and organic and<br />

elemental carbon. The results for both test catalysts show NOx conversions<br />

of nearly 80% at 100% load and even 95% at 75% load.<br />

The HC and PM emissions were also found to be reduced by both<br />

catalysts. The organic carbon fraction of PM was reduced by the<br />

catalyst as well as the sulphates. While the organic carbon reduction<br />

can be explained by the oxidation in the catalyst ,the sulphates<br />

are believed to be stored in the catalyst. Overall, the two catalysts<br />

showed nearly the same results except in the case of a lower exhaust<br />

flow (i.e. lower space velocity) were the behaviours differed.<br />

Field experience of marine SCR<br />

Johnny Briggs, IACCSEA, UK<br />

Joseph McCarney, IACCSEA, UK<br />

SCR is an established technology and has been used to remove<br />

acidic NOx from the exhaust gases of engines, boilers and other<br />

combustion processes for over 50 years. The first SCR demonstration<br />

on a ship engine was conducted more than 30 years ago and<br />

since then over 500 vessels have installed SCR technology. Today,<br />

SCR is considered a proven, commercially available technology capable<br />

of removing 95% or more of NOx in an exhaust gas. As such,<br />

it is expected to be one of the major technical options capable of<br />

meeting IMO Tier III standards. Whilst there has been considerable<br />

success in the application of marine SCR, the experience in<br />

the field is mixed and contrary messages have emerged. As part of<br />

the IMO NOx review, the International Association for the Catalytic<br />

Control of Ship Emissions to Air (IACCSEA) committed to<br />

sponsoring an independent review of field experience of marine<br />

SCR. A database comprising most of the shipping SCR installations<br />

was compiled and a representative sample was surveyed. In<br />

this paper we propose to explore the following findings from the<br />

dataset and survey:<br />

• The extent to which SCR has been applied to a wide range of<br />

marine engine types, utilising different fuels (of differing sulphur<br />

content) and operating over a range of engine conditions<br />

over the past 30 years;<br />

• The major problems that operators have had with SCR and a<br />

description of how these issues were managed, resolved or mitigated;<br />

• An outline of the most important lessons learnt that may be<br />

applicable during and after the transition to IMO Tier III.<br />

First operational experiences with a combined dry<br />

desulphurisation plant and SCR unit downstream of<br />

a HFO-fuelled marine engine<br />

Ralf Juergens, Couple Systems GTmbH, Germany<br />

In December 2011, Couple System successfully managed the commissioning<br />

of a dry scrubber (DryEGCS) in combination with a<br />

SCR catalyst. The application consists of an engine test bed on<br />

which marine diesel engines up to an output of 24 MW are running.<br />

The exhaust gases of the HFO-fueled engine are fed into the<br />

dry scrubber, named DryEGCS, where the exhaust gas is cleaned<br />

off of SOx in a magnitude of more than 99%. Particles are removed<br />

in excess of 90%. The temperature of the exhaust gas is<br />

maintained and represents the optimum temperature for the reduction<br />

of NOx by the SCR catalyst. The SCR process requires the<br />

injection of ammonia, which in this case is done in the form of an<br />

aqueous ammonia solution. The installed SCR system is one of the<br />

largest systems operated downstream of a marine diesel engine.<br />

The combined DeSOx and DeNOx system meets all present and<br />

future IMO regulations including a potential PM regulation. The<br />

entire system is monitored by a continuous monitoring system<br />

according to scheme B (MEPC.1849). The paper includes a full<br />

technical description as well as operational data.<br />

Urea SCR system for pollution control in marine<br />

diesel engines<br />

Yoshinori Izumi, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />

Hiroaki Ohara, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />

Hiroyuki Kamata, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />

Hayato Nakajima, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />

Takeshi Yamada, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />

Mamoru Irie, Diesel United, Ltd, Japan<br />

Kouji Moriyama, Diesel United, Ltd, Japan<br />

Kenji Goto, Japan Marine United Corporation, Japan<br />

70 SPECIAL<br />

Schiff&Hafen | Ship&Offshore | May 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!