Download - Shipandoffshore.net
Download - Shipandoffshore.net
Download - Shipandoffshore.net
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cimac Congress | Shanghai 2013<br />
Thursday May 16th / 08:30 – 10:00<br />
Aftertreatment – SCR Experience<br />
Testing SCR in high-sulphur application<br />
Kati Lehtoranta, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />
Raimo Turunen, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />
Hannu Vesala, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />
Sami Nyyssoenen, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Finland<br />
Niko Soikkeli, Wärtsilä Finland Oy, Finland<br />
Lucas Esselstroem, Wärtsilä Finland Oy, Finland<br />
Room C<br />
NOx and SOx emissions from ship exhausts are limited by IMO<br />
ship pollution rules. NOx emission limits are set for diesel engines<br />
depending on the engine maximum operating speed. Limits are set<br />
globally (Tier I and Tier II) and in addition for emission control<br />
areas (Tier III). Tier III standard is dated to 2016 and is expected to<br />
require the use of emission control technologies. SCR is an available<br />
technology capable of meeting this requirement. This technology<br />
uses a catalyst and ammonia for the reduction of NOx to<br />
elemental nitrogen. On the other hand, SOx limits require the use<br />
of lower sulphur level fuels or aftertreatment systems, like scrubbers,<br />
to decrease SOx emissions. Scrubbers might become popular<br />
as they allow the use of inexpensive heavy fuel oil. The sulphur is<br />
usually considered as poison to catalysts. In SCRs, a V2O5 catalyst<br />
has been widely employed due to its high activity and sulphur tolerance.<br />
Even so, sulphur-related challenges do occur. At high temperatures,<br />
the SO3 can result in an unwanted visible plume, while<br />
at low temperatures, the SO3 can react with the ammonia to form<br />
ammonium sulphates, which deposit on and foul the catalyst. This<br />
brings certain requirements for the SCR optimisation in high sulphur<br />
applications. Ships utilise large engines, which require large<br />
catalyst volumes to deal with the emissions. Installations to large<br />
engine applications can be difficult and testing rather complex.<br />
Only minor (or none) tuning of the parameters is possible in real<br />
applications. In this study, a slipstream emission control test bench<br />
is utilised to test smaller SCR units with a proper exhaust gas from<br />
a medium-speed diesel engine. The test bench has an advantage<br />
of easily tuned and controlled parameters (like temperature and<br />
exhaust flow). A heavy fuel oil with a sulphur content of 2.5% is<br />
utilised as test fuel. Two different SCR catalysts with a volume of<br />
40dm3 are tested using engine loads of 100%, 75% and 50%. In addition,<br />
different exhaust gas flow rates and temperatures, adjusted<br />
by the test bench, are utilised in testing. The test bench utilises NOx<br />
sensors placed upstream and downstream of the test SCR reactor.<br />
In addition, the standard analyser to measure the NOx (chemiluminescence)<br />
was in use. FTIR was used to measure the NH3. Hydrocarbons,<br />
carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide were measured<br />
as well. The effect of SCR on particle emissions was studied by collecting<br />
particles on filters both before and after the catalyst. The<br />
particle filters were further analysed for sulphates and organic and<br />
elemental carbon. The results for both test catalysts show NOx conversions<br />
of nearly 80% at 100% load and even 95% at 75% load.<br />
The HC and PM emissions were also found to be reduced by both<br />
catalysts. The organic carbon fraction of PM was reduced by the<br />
catalyst as well as the sulphates. While the organic carbon reduction<br />
can be explained by the oxidation in the catalyst ,the sulphates<br />
are believed to be stored in the catalyst. Overall, the two catalysts<br />
showed nearly the same results except in the case of a lower exhaust<br />
flow (i.e. lower space velocity) were the behaviours differed.<br />
Field experience of marine SCR<br />
Johnny Briggs, IACCSEA, UK<br />
Joseph McCarney, IACCSEA, UK<br />
SCR is an established technology and has been used to remove<br />
acidic NOx from the exhaust gases of engines, boilers and other<br />
combustion processes for over 50 years. The first SCR demonstration<br />
on a ship engine was conducted more than 30 years ago and<br />
since then over 500 vessels have installed SCR technology. Today,<br />
SCR is considered a proven, commercially available technology capable<br />
of removing 95% or more of NOx in an exhaust gas. As such,<br />
it is expected to be one of the major technical options capable of<br />
meeting IMO Tier III standards. Whilst there has been considerable<br />
success in the application of marine SCR, the experience in<br />
the field is mixed and contrary messages have emerged. As part of<br />
the IMO NOx review, the International Association for the Catalytic<br />
Control of Ship Emissions to Air (IACCSEA) committed to<br />
sponsoring an independent review of field experience of marine<br />
SCR. A database comprising most of the shipping SCR installations<br />
was compiled and a representative sample was surveyed. In<br />
this paper we propose to explore the following findings from the<br />
dataset and survey:<br />
• The extent to which SCR has been applied to a wide range of<br />
marine engine types, utilising different fuels (of differing sulphur<br />
content) and operating over a range of engine conditions<br />
over the past 30 years;<br />
• The major problems that operators have had with SCR and a<br />
description of how these issues were managed, resolved or mitigated;<br />
• An outline of the most important lessons learnt that may be<br />
applicable during and after the transition to IMO Tier III.<br />
First operational experiences with a combined dry<br />
desulphurisation plant and SCR unit downstream of<br />
a HFO-fuelled marine engine<br />
Ralf Juergens, Couple Systems GTmbH, Germany<br />
In December 2011, Couple System successfully managed the commissioning<br />
of a dry scrubber (DryEGCS) in combination with a<br />
SCR catalyst. The application consists of an engine test bed on<br />
which marine diesel engines up to an output of 24 MW are running.<br />
The exhaust gases of the HFO-fueled engine are fed into the<br />
dry scrubber, named DryEGCS, where the exhaust gas is cleaned<br />
off of SOx in a magnitude of more than 99%. Particles are removed<br />
in excess of 90%. The temperature of the exhaust gas is<br />
maintained and represents the optimum temperature for the reduction<br />
of NOx by the SCR catalyst. The SCR process requires the<br />
injection of ammonia, which in this case is done in the form of an<br />
aqueous ammonia solution. The installed SCR system is one of the<br />
largest systems operated downstream of a marine diesel engine.<br />
The combined DeSOx and DeNOx system meets all present and<br />
future IMO regulations including a potential PM regulation. The<br />
entire system is monitored by a continuous monitoring system<br />
according to scheme B (MEPC.1849). The paper includes a full<br />
technical description as well as operational data.<br />
Urea SCR system for pollution control in marine<br />
diesel engines<br />
Yoshinori Izumi, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />
Hiroaki Ohara, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />
Hiroyuki Kamata, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />
Hayato Nakajima, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />
Takeshi Yamada, IHI Corporation, Japan<br />
Mamoru Irie, Diesel United, Ltd, Japan<br />
Kouji Moriyama, Diesel United, Ltd, Japan<br />
Kenji Goto, Japan Marine United Corporation, Japan<br />
70 SPECIAL<br />
Schiff&Hafen | Ship&Offshore | May 2013