Download - Shipandoffshore.net
Download - Shipandoffshore.net
Download - Shipandoffshore.net
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Monday, May 13th<br />
Tuesday, May 14th<br />
Wednesday, May 15th<br />
Thursday, May 16th<br />
In this paper several cases of disintegration of propulsion systems<br />
in practice will be discussed. The examples range from fracture of<br />
propeller shafts through rupture of rubber elastic couplings to repeated<br />
damage of bearings and unworkable situations due to instable<br />
behavior of control systems. Each case is discussed in detail<br />
and the damage mechanism as well as the consequences from an<br />
operational point of view will be presented as well as the measurements<br />
and calculations necessary to determine the root cause.<br />
Factors of influence on the development of the damage or wear<br />
mechanism for each case will be presented. A procedure to prevent<br />
the encountered damages and unwanted interaction between<br />
components in a system and detect them in an early stage will be<br />
proposed.<br />
Systematic Evaluation of performance of vlcc engine,<br />
comparing service monitored data and<br />
thermodynamic model predictions<br />
Nikolaos Kyrtatos, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<br />
Stefanos Glaros, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<br />
Efstratios Tzanos, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<br />
Stavros Hatzigrigoris, Maran Tankers Management Inc, Greece<br />
Fotis Dalmyras, Maran Tankers Management Inc, Greece<br />
The general practice in ship engine performance monitoring is to<br />
record important engine parameters (i.e. pressures, temperatures,<br />
speeds etc.). Some shipping companies include cylinder pressures<br />
and shaft torque recordings. Periodically, data is collected in a service<br />
report form and forwarded to headquarters for further processing<br />
and evaluation. Whilst most marine diesel engines are fitted<br />
with some type of condition monitoring, the thermodynamic performance<br />
evaluation systems used in the aerospace and process industries,<br />
have not been widely used in performance assessment of<br />
marine diesel ship propulsion and auxiliary engines. One reason<br />
is the complexity of the diesel engine process requiring sophisticated<br />
thermodynamic models. This paper presents the procedure<br />
applied for shipboard engine performance evaluation, using<br />
a thermodynamic model to generate reference data. The model,<br />
which requires some detailed geometric information for each specific<br />
engine, was initially calibrated using the shop tests data and<br />
validated for accuracy using the sea trials data and early service<br />
data of the specific engine. Then, the recordings from monthly<br />
in-service performance reports were compared with simulation<br />
predictions for the same operating conditions. Any important differences<br />
between obtained (measured) and expected (simulation)<br />
values may point out to component or process problems. Thus,<br />
in cases where the deviations in the various engine operating parameters<br />
exceeded a limit of 3%, the cause was investigated. In<br />
some possible operating conditions of a ship dictated by market<br />
conditions, no prior operating data was available. Also presented<br />
in the paper are results of simulations using the validated model<br />
of the specific engine at very low loads (< 20%), to predict engine<br />
performance, prior to actual operation.<br />
Thursday May 16th / 10:30 – 12:00<br />
Aftertreatment – Specific Aspects<br />
Aftertreatment systems for marine applications:<br />
practical experience from the perspective of a<br />
classification society<br />
Fabian Kock, Germanischer Lloyd, Germany<br />
Room C<br />
Recently, the Marine Environmental Protection Committee<br />
(MEPC) of the IMO adopted guidelines addressing additional<br />
aspects to the NOx Technical Code 2008 with regard to particular<br />
requirements related to marine diesel engines fitted with SCR<br />
systems. Following these guidelines, a combined engine and SCR<br />
may be tested separately in cases where the combined system can<br />
neither be tested on a test bed due to technical and practical reasons<br />
nor an onboard test can be performed fully complying with<br />
the test requirements detailed in the NOx Technical code 2008.<br />
The certification procedure to be processed in such instances has<br />
been referred to as the ’Scheme B approach’. In particular, starting<br />
from January 1st 2016, when the third stage of emission limits for<br />
NOx (Tier III) shall apply to newbuildings when operating in an<br />
ECA, the new guideline and the Scheme B approach will impose<br />
a strong challenge for engine and SCR manufacturers, ship operators<br />
and certifiers (recognised organisations / classification societies)<br />
from a technical and operational point of view. Germanischer<br />
Lloyd (GL), acting as a recognised organisation for more than 90<br />
flag states, has a strong interest in a lean and inviolable introduction<br />
of the legislation imposed by IMO. Thus, GL has started to<br />
accompany and supervise the design and installation of marine<br />
diesel engines fitted with SCR systems applying the Scheme B approach<br />
at an early stage on a number of pilot installations in order.<br />
Moreover, GL’s accredited laboratory for ’Exhaust Emission Measurement<br />
and Chemical Analyses’ has long lasting experience in<br />
measuring the exhaust gas emissions from marine diesel engines<br />
fitted with SCR systems on board vessels, which have to follow the<br />
Swedish NOx tax regulation and therefore has a deep insight into<br />
the long-term in-service experience SCR manufacturers and ship<br />
owners have with this kind of systems. This presentation aims to<br />
introduce latest experiences in measuring, survey and certification<br />
of gaseous emissions from marine diesel engines fitted with SCR.<br />
The presentation evaluates technical solutions for exhaust gas aftertreatment<br />
systems from the perspective of a classification society<br />
with a strong focus on its technical, operational, organisational<br />
and administrative challenges. In particular, the applicability of<br />
the new ’Scheme B’ approach provided by IMO concerning the<br />
combined certification of engines and SCR systems tested separately<br />
is examined critically on the basis of a number of practical<br />
examples.<br />
Simulation-based development of the SCR spray<br />
preparation for large diesel engines<br />
Moritz Frobenius, AVL Germany, Germany<br />
Carsten Schmalhorst, AVL Germany, Germany<br />
Rainer Fiereder, AVL Germany, Germany<br />
Carsten Rickert, Caterpillar Motoren , Germany<br />
Jan Dreves, Caterpillar Motoren, Germany<br />
Michael Zallinger, AVL List GmbH, Austria<br />
In order to fulfil the requirements of the IMO Tier III regulation,<br />
either a combination of internal engine technologies or external<br />
measures are required. Exhaust gas aftertreatment by Selective<br />
Catalytic Reduction (SCR) is a proven technology that basically<br />
allows any engine to fulfil the IMO-III regulation. The design<br />
of compact SCR systems remains a significant challenge for the<br />
developer. Besides a high efficient NOx -conversion on the catalysts,<br />
the main issue is the efficient spray preparation including<br />
the injection of a urea-water solution and the distribution of the<br />
reducing agent ammonia, generated by a thermolysis reaction. The<br />
uniformity of the ammonia at the catalyst inlet is decisive in order<br />
to achieve highest levels of Nox reduction and to avoid deposit<br />
formation. Therefore well adapted designs are mandatory to fulfil<br />
the system targets concerning emissions, durability and cost effectiveness.<br />
Due to the complex physical and chemical phenomena<br />
involved in the spray injection, CFD simulations are performed to<br />
May 2013 | Schiff&Hafen | Ship&Offshore SPECIAL 75