25.06.2014 Views

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monday, May 13th<br />

Tuesday, May 14th<br />

Wednesday, May 15th<br />

Thursday, May 16th<br />

In this paper several cases of disintegration of propulsion systems<br />

in practice will be discussed. The examples range from fracture of<br />

propeller shafts through rupture of rubber elastic couplings to repeated<br />

damage of bearings and unworkable situations due to instable<br />

behavior of control systems. Each case is discussed in detail<br />

and the damage mechanism as well as the consequences from an<br />

operational point of view will be presented as well as the measurements<br />

and calculations necessary to determine the root cause.<br />

Factors of influence on the development of the damage or wear<br />

mechanism for each case will be presented. A procedure to prevent<br />

the encountered damages and unwanted interaction between<br />

components in a system and detect them in an early stage will be<br />

proposed.<br />

Systematic Evaluation of performance of vlcc engine,<br />

comparing service monitored data and<br />

thermodynamic model predictions<br />

Nikolaos Kyrtatos, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<br />

Stefanos Glaros, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<br />

Efstratios Tzanos, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<br />

Stavros Hatzigrigoris, Maran Tankers Management Inc, Greece<br />

Fotis Dalmyras, Maran Tankers Management Inc, Greece<br />

The general practice in ship engine performance monitoring is to<br />

record important engine parameters (i.e. pressures, temperatures,<br />

speeds etc.). Some shipping companies include cylinder pressures<br />

and shaft torque recordings. Periodically, data is collected in a service<br />

report form and forwarded to headquarters for further processing<br />

and evaluation. Whilst most marine diesel engines are fitted<br />

with some type of condition monitoring, the thermodynamic performance<br />

evaluation systems used in the aerospace and process industries,<br />

have not been widely used in performance assessment of<br />

marine diesel ship propulsion and auxiliary engines. One reason<br />

is the complexity of the diesel engine process requiring sophisticated<br />

thermodynamic models. This paper presents the procedure<br />

applied for shipboard engine performance evaluation, using<br />

a thermodynamic model to generate reference data. The model,<br />

which requires some detailed geometric information for each specific<br />

engine, was initially calibrated using the shop tests data and<br />

validated for accuracy using the sea trials data and early service<br />

data of the specific engine. Then, the recordings from monthly<br />

in-service performance reports were compared with simulation<br />

predictions for the same operating conditions. Any important differences<br />

between obtained (measured) and expected (simulation)<br />

values may point out to component or process problems. Thus,<br />

in cases where the deviations in the various engine operating parameters<br />

exceeded a limit of 3%, the cause was investigated. In<br />

some possible operating conditions of a ship dictated by market<br />

conditions, no prior operating data was available. Also presented<br />

in the paper are results of simulations using the validated model<br />

of the specific engine at very low loads (< 20%), to predict engine<br />

performance, prior to actual operation.<br />

Thursday May 16th / 10:30 – 12:00<br />

Aftertreatment – Specific Aspects<br />

Aftertreatment systems for marine applications:<br />

practical experience from the perspective of a<br />

classification society<br />

Fabian Kock, Germanischer Lloyd, Germany<br />

Room C<br />

Recently, the Marine Environmental Protection Committee<br />

(MEPC) of the IMO adopted guidelines addressing additional<br />

aspects to the NOx Technical Code 2008 with regard to particular<br />

requirements related to marine diesel engines fitted with SCR<br />

systems. Following these guidelines, a combined engine and SCR<br />

may be tested separately in cases where the combined system can<br />

neither be tested on a test bed due to technical and practical reasons<br />

nor an onboard test can be performed fully complying with<br />

the test requirements detailed in the NOx Technical code 2008.<br />

The certification procedure to be processed in such instances has<br />

been referred to as the ’Scheme B approach’. In particular, starting<br />

from January 1st 2016, when the third stage of emission limits for<br />

NOx (Tier III) shall apply to newbuildings when operating in an<br />

ECA, the new guideline and the Scheme B approach will impose<br />

a strong challenge for engine and SCR manufacturers, ship operators<br />

and certifiers (recognised organisations / classification societies)<br />

from a technical and operational point of view. Germanischer<br />

Lloyd (GL), acting as a recognised organisation for more than 90<br />

flag states, has a strong interest in a lean and inviolable introduction<br />

of the legislation imposed by IMO. Thus, GL has started to<br />

accompany and supervise the design and installation of marine<br />

diesel engines fitted with SCR systems applying the Scheme B approach<br />

at an early stage on a number of pilot installations in order.<br />

Moreover, GL’s accredited laboratory for ’Exhaust Emission Measurement<br />

and Chemical Analyses’ has long lasting experience in<br />

measuring the exhaust gas emissions from marine diesel engines<br />

fitted with SCR systems on board vessels, which have to follow the<br />

Swedish NOx tax regulation and therefore has a deep insight into<br />

the long-term in-service experience SCR manufacturers and ship<br />

owners have with this kind of systems. This presentation aims to<br />

introduce latest experiences in measuring, survey and certification<br />

of gaseous emissions from marine diesel engines fitted with SCR.<br />

The presentation evaluates technical solutions for exhaust gas aftertreatment<br />

systems from the perspective of a classification society<br />

with a strong focus on its technical, operational, organisational<br />

and administrative challenges. In particular, the applicability of<br />

the new ’Scheme B’ approach provided by IMO concerning the<br />

combined certification of engines and SCR systems tested separately<br />

is examined critically on the basis of a number of practical<br />

examples.<br />

Simulation-based development of the SCR spray<br />

preparation for large diesel engines<br />

Moritz Frobenius, AVL Germany, Germany<br />

Carsten Schmalhorst, AVL Germany, Germany<br />

Rainer Fiereder, AVL Germany, Germany<br />

Carsten Rickert, Caterpillar Motoren , Germany<br />

Jan Dreves, Caterpillar Motoren, Germany<br />

Michael Zallinger, AVL List GmbH, Austria<br />

In order to fulfil the requirements of the IMO Tier III regulation,<br />

either a combination of internal engine technologies or external<br />

measures are required. Exhaust gas aftertreatment by Selective<br />

Catalytic Reduction (SCR) is a proven technology that basically<br />

allows any engine to fulfil the IMO-III regulation. The design<br />

of compact SCR systems remains a significant challenge for the<br />

developer. Besides a high efficient NOx -conversion on the catalysts,<br />

the main issue is the efficient spray preparation including<br />

the injection of a urea-water solution and the distribution of the<br />

reducing agent ammonia, generated by a thermolysis reaction. The<br />

uniformity of the ammonia at the catalyst inlet is decisive in order<br />

to achieve highest levels of Nox reduction and to avoid deposit<br />

formation. Therefore well adapted designs are mandatory to fulfil<br />

the system targets concerning emissions, durability and cost effectiveness.<br />

Due to the complex physical and chemical phenomena<br />

involved in the spray injection, CFD simulations are performed to<br />

May 2013 | Schiff&Hafen | Ship&Offshore SPECIAL 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!