25.06.2014 Views

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

Download - Shipandoffshore.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monday, May 13th<br />

Tuesday, May 14th<br />

Wednesday, May 15th<br />

Thursday, May 16th<br />

Combination of post-injection and cooled EGR at a<br />

medium-speed diesel engine to comply with IMO Tier<br />

III emission limits<br />

Marko Pueschel, FVTR GmbH, Germany<br />

Bert Buchholz, FVTR GmbH, Germany<br />

Christian Fink, Universität Rostock, Germany<br />

Carsten Rickert, Caterpillar Motoren GmbH & Co KG, Germany<br />

Kai Ruschmeyer, Caterpillar Motoren GmbH & Co KG, Germany<br />

With introduction of IMO Tier III in 2016 the marine diesel engine<br />

technology faces a radical change. The IMO Tier III requires NOx reductions<br />

of 75 % compared with the current level (IMO Tier II). In<br />

connection with the stringent NOx reductions massive SOx reductions<br />

will be introduced stepwise until 2015. In light of this, the potential<br />

of EGR to fulfil the IMO Tier III NOx limits at medium-speed<br />

marine diesel engines is systematically analysed. The targets are defined<br />

by a NOx emissions level of 2 g/kWh, invisible smoke and<br />

minimum fuel consumption penalty. The analyses are carried out<br />

at a six-cylinder medium-speed test engine with 1,000 kW output at<br />

1,000 rpm. The research engine is equipped with a cooled EGR system,<br />

a common rail injection system and a programmable engine<br />

control unit. The CR injectors are solenoid operated and allow multiple<br />

injections. Systematic variations of EGR rate, injection pressure<br />

and injection timing were carried out and the results regarding combustion<br />

process, NOx and soot emissions as well as fuel consumption<br />

are presented. The results show that significant EGR rates are<br />

necessary to obtain NOx-reduction rates as required for IMO Tier III<br />

compliance. These high EGR rates result in unwanted and unacceptable<br />

soot emission levels even at increased injection pressures. To<br />

reduce these soot emissions, post-injection strategies were analysed<br />

at the medium-speed test engine. Post injection proved to be an efficient<br />

soot reduction measure in onroad diesel engine. The effect of<br />

different post injections on the soot emissions is shown. Based on<br />

the results, the soot emission reduction potential of postinjections<br />

at marine medium-speed diesel engines is outlined and the requirements<br />

for a successful implementation of post-injection strategies<br />

are discussed. The application of post-injections requires detailed<br />

information on the dynamic behaviour of the common rail system<br />

and especially on the CR injectors applied. Due to this, the dynamics<br />

of the CR injectors in case of post-injections were established at<br />

an injection rate analyser and the findings are discussed. The functionality<br />

of the CR injectors at the test engine is monitored by measurements<br />

of the current feed signal and the injection pressure at the<br />

injector inlet. Finally, the preconditions for a successful application<br />

of EGR at medium-speed marine diesel engines are summarised.<br />

The use of EGR not only challenges the injection (rail pressure, post<br />

injections), charging and the cooling system (EGR, charge air) but<br />

also the engine control system.<br />

Ten years after: results from the major programme<br />

HERCULES A-B-C on marine engine R&D<br />

Nikolaos Kyrtatos, National Technical University of Athens, Greece<br />

Lars Hellberg, Wärtsilä Corporation, Finland<br />

Christian Poensgen, MAN Diesel & Turbo SE, Germany<br />

In the year 2004, the integrated project HERCULES-A (Higher-<br />

Efficiency Engine R&D on Combustion with Ultra-Low Emissions<br />

for Ships) was initiated by the major engine makers MAN and<br />

Wärtsilä, which together hold 90% of the world market. It was the<br />

phase I of the HERCULES R&D programme on large engine technologies.<br />

The HERCULES-A involved 42 industrial and university<br />

partners, with a budget of EUR 33 million, partly funded by the<br />

European Union. The project was broad in the coverage of the various<br />

R&D topics and considered a range of options and technologies<br />

in improving efficiency and reducing emissions. HERCULES-B<br />

was phase II of the programme, from 2008 to 2011, with 32 participating<br />

organisations and EUR 26 million budget, partly funded<br />

by European Union. The general targets for emissions and fuel<br />

consumption were retained in HERCULES-B. However, based on<br />

the developed know-how and results of HERCULES-A, it was possible<br />

to narrow the search area, to focus on potential breakthrough<br />

research and to further develop the most promising techniques for<br />

lower specific fuel consumption (and CO 2<br />

emissions) and ultralow<br />

gaseous and particulate emissions. The HERCULES-C project<br />

(2012-2015), with 22 participant organisations and EUR 17 million<br />

budget, is phase III of the HERCULES programme and adopts<br />

a combinatory approach, with an extensive integration of the multitude<br />

of new technologies identified in phase I and phase II, for<br />

engine thermal processes optimisation, system integration, as well<br />

as engine reliability and lifetime. This paper provides an overview<br />

of the complex structure, as well as the main achievements of the<br />

HERCULES R&D programme in the past ten years.<br />

Wednesday May 15th / 08:30 – 10:00 Room D<br />

Integrated Systems and Electronic Control<br />

Piston Engines, Gas and Steam Turbines and Applications –<br />

Propulsion System Integration<br />

Benefits of propulsion integration on fuel efficiency<br />

of marine vessels<br />

Elias Boletis, Wärtsilä Corporation, The Netherlands<br />

A major effort is undertaken to improve the energy efficiency of<br />

shipping. This requires that the (engine) thermal efficiency and the<br />

ship propulsive efficiency are addressed simultaneously. New IMO<br />

rules are referred to the vessel environmental indices (as overall energy<br />

efficiency per carried load and distance transported) than only<br />

to the efficiency of individual engine types and systems. The reciprocating<br />

engine concept seems to remain the basis for fuel energy<br />

conversion to mechanical energy, with emphasis on fuel versatility<br />

and the broad introduction of gas. The ship propulsion systems<br />

(fixed or controllable pitch propellers, steerable thrusters and advanced<br />

designs of high-efficiency potential) undergo new developments<br />

with emphasis on high vessel propulsive efficiency and<br />

engine compatibility. The vessel design itself is also to be adapted<br />

to the new propelling and machine room equipment. Obviously<br />

this integration can better be done in early ship and system design<br />

phases. The current paper describes the impact of the propulsion<br />

system and the propeller selection on the overall vessel efficiency<br />

optimisation. A number of vessel cases are examined in detail:<br />

• Large container ship applications at slow steaming/propeller selection;<br />

• Drilling vessel application/thruster optimisation;<br />

• Gas engine application/propeller control;<br />

• Special vessel diesel mechanic application with two-stage gear<br />

boxes;<br />

• Propeller power loading on vessel performance.<br />

The paper attempts to make a quantification of the overall benefits<br />

of the judicious selection of propulsion characteristics and provides<br />

guidelines for the future.<br />

Analysis and evaluation of innovative hybrid<br />

powertrain architectures combining gas engines and<br />

electric propulsion for tugboats<br />

Ioannis Vlaskos, Ricardo Deutschland GmbH, Germany<br />

David Gagliardi, Ricardo Deutschland GmbH, Germany<br />

Martin Spiller, Ricardo Deutschland GmbH, Germany<br />

Kevin Thuemmler, Ricardo Deutschland GmbH, Germany<br />

May 2013 | Schiff&Hafen | Ship&Offshore SPECIAL 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!