28.06.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There are also election returns that are so irregular on their face that it is<br />

virtually and legally impossible to canvass them. We found these in certain precincts<br />

in Cebu 36 and Bohol. 37<br />

Thus there are election returns that are completely blank as to make it<br />

impossible to identify the precinct or municipality, and yet they contain carefully<br />

recorded votes. In Iloilo, <strong>for</strong> example, ER 06202193 has no identifying marks but it<br />

records 20 votes <strong>for</strong> FPJ and 135 votes <strong>for</strong> GMA.<br />

On the other hand, there are also election returns without signatures of BEI<br />

members, such as those from Manadue, Cebu. There are many other irregularities in<br />

the returns, but those in the <strong>for</strong>egoing fashion are the most predominant.<br />

For the major findings in the power point slide presentation of Tabayoyong that<br />

was shown to the CCTA, we set <strong>for</strong>th the summarization published by Neal Cruz in his<br />

column, as follows:<br />

“In a powerpoint presentation, Legarda and her principal witness,<br />

Segundo Tabayoyong, showed the Kapihan sa Manila <strong>for</strong>um last Monday<br />

how the cheating was done. It was simplicity itself and very easy to do.<br />

It was a new way of cheating, used <strong>for</strong> the first time in the elections of<br />

2004. (Tabayoyong was a Questioned Document Examiner and <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

chief of the Questioned Documents Division of the National Bureau of<br />

Investigation. He has retired.)<br />

Instead of changing the ballots at the precincts -- as was done in the<br />

past, which is difficult and labor-intensive -- the cheating was done<br />

on the election return (ER), the summary of the votes in the<br />

precincts. Election returns of a city or municipality are totaled in<br />

the Statement of Votes (SOV) which are, in turn, summarized in the<br />

Certificate of Canvass (COC) <strong>for</strong> the province. It is the COCs that<br />

are added by Congress to determine the presidential and vice<br />

presidential winners.<br />

What the cheaters did -- Legarda and Tabayoyong explained -- was<br />

simply fill up new election returns, disregarding the ballots. These<br />

spurious ERs were prepared in advance, by a special <strong>for</strong>ce of about 200<br />

persons in two places in Metro Manila (one in a hotel near the Edsa<br />

highway) and then sent to the provinces. Thus, the votes were already<br />

counted and the "winners" known even be<strong>for</strong>e the voting started. It didn't<br />

matter <strong>for</strong> whom the people voted. It was the special <strong>for</strong>ce that decided<br />

the winners.<br />

36<br />

For reference, see Precinct 126 A and B in Basak, Lapulapu, Cebu.<br />

37<br />

For reference, see Precint 088-A, Ulbujan, Bohol (Page 2 serial number 05500591 is different from page 1), or<br />

Precinct 009-A and B in Bauno, San Isidro, Bohol (page 2 serial number 05502399 is different from page 1).<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!