FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Right now, the venue where we can demand answers, testimonies<br />
and evidence from all parties is the impeachment trial, the only<br />
constitutional process available and acceptable to many to ferret<br />
out the truth. What happens when the House Committee on<br />
Justice votes to consider only the original Lozano complaint and<br />
subsequently acts to throw it out on a technicality? What do we do<br />
next?” (emphasis supplied)<br />
-- the House Justice Committee hearings on the impeachment complaints<br />
continued, with the motion of Rep. Lagman that his “7 prejudicial<br />
questions” be tackled first be<strong>for</strong>e the Committee tackles sufficiency of<br />
<strong>for</strong>m/substance being carried, with 54 votes in favor, 24 votes against,<br />
and 3 abstentions<br />
-- TV Patrol featured news to the effect that five Representatives have<br />
decided to sign the Amended Impeachment Complaint, namely,<br />
Reps. Edmundo Reyes, Dudut Jaworski, Ace Barbers, Renato<br />
Magtubo, and Gilbert Remulla<br />
September 4, 2005 – the Department of Foreign Affairs received the note verbale<br />
of the Singapore government attesting to the arrival of Garcillano in<br />
Singapore on July 14, 2005 and departure <strong>for</strong> London on July 15, 2005<br />
but did not immediately transmit the in<strong>for</strong>mation to the House of<br />
Representatives Committees investigating the Garci Tapes controversy<br />
despite their earlier issuance of a warrant of arrest <strong>for</strong> Garcillano<br />
September 5-6, 2005 – the House of Representatives ruled that the Lozano<br />
impeachment complaint was filed prior to and there<strong>for</strong>e bars the Lopez<br />
and the Amended Impeachment Complaints from being officially acted<br />
upon by the House, on the basis of the constitutional prohibition against the<br />
filing of more than one impeachment proceeding within a year; thereafter, the<br />
House dismissed the Lozano impeachment complaint on the ground of<br />
insufficiency in <strong>for</strong>m and substance 52<br />
-- In his privilege speech, Rep. Remulla revealed facts showing the<br />
underhanded escape of Garcillano from the country through<br />
conspiratorial acts among agencies of government (discovered by<br />
him through his own high-level contacts in the diplomatic<br />
community and <strong>for</strong>eign services), despite the contempt citation and<br />
warrant of arrest against him by the House, as follows:<br />
“1. Mr. Garcillano arrived in Singapore on board a Lear jet of the<br />
Subic International Air Charter, Inc. on July 14, 2005.<br />
52<br />
According to the House Journal, “With 158 affirmative votes, 51 negative votes and 6 abstentions, the House<br />
approved Committee Report No. 1012 on House Resolution No. 933 submitted by the Committee on Justice,<br />
pertaining to the dismissal of the impeachment complaints against President Macapagal-Arroyo.”<br />
133