28.06.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Right now, the venue where we can demand answers, testimonies<br />

and evidence from all parties is the impeachment trial, the only<br />

constitutional process available and acceptable to many to ferret<br />

out the truth. What happens when the House Committee on<br />

Justice votes to consider only the original Lozano complaint and<br />

subsequently acts to throw it out on a technicality? What do we do<br />

next?” (emphasis supplied)<br />

-- the House Justice Committee hearings on the impeachment complaints<br />

continued, with the motion of Rep. Lagman that his “7 prejudicial<br />

questions” be tackled first be<strong>for</strong>e the Committee tackles sufficiency of<br />

<strong>for</strong>m/substance being carried, with 54 votes in favor, 24 votes against,<br />

and 3 abstentions<br />

-- TV Patrol featured news to the effect that five Representatives have<br />

decided to sign the Amended Impeachment Complaint, namely,<br />

Reps. Edmundo Reyes, Dudut Jaworski, Ace Barbers, Renato<br />

Magtubo, and Gilbert Remulla<br />

September 4, 2005 – the Department of Foreign Affairs received the note verbale<br />

of the Singapore government attesting to the arrival of Garcillano in<br />

Singapore on July 14, 2005 and departure <strong>for</strong> London on July 15, 2005<br />

but did not immediately transmit the in<strong>for</strong>mation to the House of<br />

Representatives Committees investigating the Garci Tapes controversy<br />

despite their earlier issuance of a warrant of arrest <strong>for</strong> Garcillano<br />

September 5-6, 2005 – the House of Representatives ruled that the Lozano<br />

impeachment complaint was filed prior to and there<strong>for</strong>e bars the Lopez<br />

and the Amended Impeachment Complaints from being officially acted<br />

upon by the House, on the basis of the constitutional prohibition against the<br />

filing of more than one impeachment proceeding within a year; thereafter, the<br />

House dismissed the Lozano impeachment complaint on the ground of<br />

insufficiency in <strong>for</strong>m and substance 52<br />

-- In his privilege speech, Rep. Remulla revealed facts showing the<br />

underhanded escape of Garcillano from the country through<br />

conspiratorial acts among agencies of government (discovered by<br />

him through his own high-level contacts in the diplomatic<br />

community and <strong>for</strong>eign services), despite the contempt citation and<br />

warrant of arrest against him by the House, as follows:<br />

“1. Mr. Garcillano arrived in Singapore on board a Lear jet of the<br />

Subic International Air Charter, Inc. on July 14, 2005.<br />

52<br />

According to the House Journal, “With 158 affirmative votes, 51 negative votes and 6 abstentions, the House<br />

approved Committee Report No. 1012 on House Resolution No. 933 submitted by the Committee on Justice,<br />

pertaining to the dismissal of the impeachment complaints against President Macapagal-Arroyo.”<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!