28.06.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

men at the San Carlos Seminary guarding him. The only man I had<br />

there was Lito who is a buddy and close and long-time friend of<br />

Doble. In fact, neither Lito nor I was armed while Doble brought<br />

with him his 45 caliber pistol because he said he needed it to defend<br />

himself against anyone that might be sent by Pres. Arroyo or the<br />

First Gentleman to liquidate him because of what he did.<br />

25. Doble and all of us were free to roam along the corridors and vicinity<br />

of the dormitory as, in fact, we had conversations among ourselves and<br />

sometimes with some priests at the reception area located at the corridor<br />

of the second floor. I also did not notice any security personnel of Mayor<br />

Binay in the area as the only other male persons I saw in the building<br />

are Bishops Bacani, some priests and office personnel of the San Carlos<br />

Seminary who hold office at the ground floor of the building.<br />

26. On the night of June 12, 2005, Lito left the San Carlos Seminary.<br />

27. Sometime around 12-1 P.M. of June 13, 2005, I was told that<br />

Doble was fetched by Bishop Socrates Villegas from the San Carlos<br />

Seminary upon the request of the woman claiming to be Doble’s wife<br />

and their two children who were supposedly at the main entrance to<br />

San Carlos Seminary.<br />

28. I was then brought out of the seminary by Bishop Bacani and other<br />

bishops and taken to a safe house in the south.<br />

29. In further support of the <strong>for</strong>egoing, attached as Annexes A and B<br />

hereto and made integral parts hereof are the affidavits of Bishop<br />

Bacani and Marietta Santos.” (emphasis supplied)<br />

The criminal case <strong>for</strong> serious illegal detention against Samuel Ong and Rez<br />

Cortez was dismissed last April 20, 2006 by the Makati Regional Trial Court, where it<br />

was filed by the Department of Justice following the charge of the PNP. In dismissing<br />

the case, Branch 139 Presiding Judge Benjamin Pozon declared: “After personally<br />

evaluating the [DOJ] resolution and the evidence…this court finds no probable cause <strong>for</strong><br />

the issuance of warrant of arrests against the accused.”<br />

The dismissal by the Makati court signifies that police authorities had no basis<br />

to accuse Ong of anything in the first place. To us, this confirms that the leadership<br />

of the police authorities in this country deliberately allowed themselves, and thereby<br />

their foot soldiers, to be used to harass Samuel Ong into silence.<br />

Marieta Santos<br />

We note that the testimonies under oath of Marieta Santos be<strong>for</strong>e the Senate<br />

coincide with and affirm the <strong>for</strong>egoing story of Ong on very crucial points. In her said<br />

Senate testimonies, Santos categorically --<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!