28.06.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Commission on Elections has admitted that it overprinted<br />

32,000 sets of these ERs be<strong>for</strong>e the elections. It has not explained<br />

fully what happened to these excess ERs. It is believed that these<br />

were the same fake ERs used by the cheating team. It was a<br />

systematic, well-financed, well-managed and well-supervised operation<br />

by professional cheaters, Legarda and Tabayoyong said.<br />

The cheaters, however, made mistakes. And that gave them away. ERs<br />

supposedly coming from areas thousands of kilometers apart were filled<br />

in by the same hands, said Tabayoyong. The vertical tally bars ("taras")<br />

used to mark the votes on the ERs were written very neatly and not in<br />

the uneven manner when written in the precincts because of stress and<br />

haste. There are columns where there are totals of votes but no bars.<br />

There are totals that do not tally with the bars. Thumb marks used to<br />

close the columns -- so no new bars could be added afterwards-were<br />

small, purposely smudged to make identification impossible. Required<br />

signatures were missing. Some had only initials instead of signatures.<br />

Of the approximately 5,000 ERs analyzed, 3,000 were found to be<br />

spurious.<br />

The analysis also showed that the team gave De Castro an average of a<br />

70-vote margin over Legarda, and Ms Arroyo, a 100-vote margin over<br />

Poe. There<strong>for</strong>e, the 32,000 sets of overprinted ERs could translate to a<br />

vote-margin rate of approximately 2.1 million votes in the Legarda-De<br />

Castro contest and around 3 million votes in the Poe-Arroyo race. Thus,<br />

De Castro and Ms Arroyo had something like 2 million votes and 3<br />

million votes, respectively, <strong>for</strong> "insurance." Even if their rivals won in<br />

other areas, the insurance votes made sure Ms Arroyo and De Castro<br />

won in the totals.” (“As I See It: How cheating was done in 2004 polls,”<br />

Neal H. Cruz, first posted 00:34am (Mla time) Sept 28, 2005, Inquirer<br />

News Service; emphasis supplied)<br />

Members of the political opposition in the House of course attempted to expose,<br />

during the national canvassing, the <strong>for</strong>egoing fact of egregious electoral fraud in favor<br />

of President Arroyo, but were – as in the impeachment proceedings – rebuffed, <strong>for</strong> no<br />

legal reason – by the administration bloc.<br />

The House Minority Report has placed the following on record:<br />

“Against the backdrop of the a<strong>for</strong>ementioned events 38 , the Joint<br />

Committee proceeded to determine the authenticity and due execution of<br />

the certificates of canvass referred to it and preliminarily canvass the<br />

votes cast <strong>for</strong> presidential and vice-presidential candidates. In the<br />

course of these proceedings be<strong>for</strong>e the Joint Committee, the Minority<br />

38<br />

referring to questionable Comelec decisions such as the gigantic increase of registered voters from 33 million in<br />

2001 to 43 million in 2004, the overprinting of three (3) million ballots and thirty-three thousand (33,000) election<br />

returns which have remained unaccounted <strong>for</strong>, the sub-contracting of printing jobs to private entities, etc.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!