FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
FINAL REPORT - Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
-- an article wherein Tabayoyong discussed details of the manner of fabrication<br />
of election returns during the 2004 elections<br />
B) in the news program TV Patrol --<br />
-- Tipo-Tipo, Basilan election supervisor Rashma Hali confirmed the<br />
harassment employed upon her by the military to pressure<br />
her into cooperating with Garcillano<br />
-- sound engineer James Sarthou stated his opinion that it is the<br />
Bunye tapes that are fabricated, whereas the Paguia tapes are<br />
not<br />
August 19, 2005 – President Arroyo issued E.O. 453 creating the 54-member<br />
Consultative Commission on charter change<br />
-- “Public Consultations” begin…<br />
-- over ANC Channel<br />
-- expert sound engineer Jaime Sarthou stated that the word<br />
“dagdag” in the Garci Tapes truly exists and was spoken, not<br />
fabricated by splicing whether from “Binalbag” or any other<br />
word/s<br />
-- President Arroyo’s lawyer Romulo Macalintal rebutted Tabayoyong’s<br />
statements regarding the irregularities that he saw in the election<br />
returns that he examined (e.g., re the size of the thumbmarks, the<br />
color of the ink, etc.)<br />
-- Rep. Escudero rebutted the statements of Atty. Macalintal<br />
August 30, 2005 – <strong>for</strong>mer DSWD Secretary Corazon “Dinky” Soliman issued her<br />
statement disclosing how, after issuing live on television her<br />
admission/apology on June 27, 2006, President Arroyo had instructed<br />
Presidential Adviser Gabriel Claudio to have Rep. Rodante Marcoleta<br />
indorse the impeachment complaint which, according to Claudio, the<br />
latter had already filed that morning:<br />
“STATEMENT OF CORAZON JULIANO SOLIMAN, August 30, 2005<br />
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, dear friends. The past two<br />
hearings of the Justice Committee of the House of Representatives has<br />
been quite instructive <strong>for</strong> me as a citizen concerned with the truth and<br />
concerned <strong>for</strong> the future. I have listened patiently to the debate on the<br />
prejudicial questions, starting with seven and now narrowed down to<br />
two. I have come to realize that procedures and technicalities are quite<br />
important in order to delimit or expand the scope of the impeachment<br />
proceedings at the House of Representatives.<br />
128