28.06.2014 Views

Got Food? - the Scientia Review

Got Food? - the Scientia Review

Got Food? - the Scientia Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 12<br />

Sustainability and <strong>Food</strong><br />

Dennis Giaya, Eric Williams, and Rohit Satishchandra<br />

Introduction<br />

The high population density of many countries raises questions about <strong>the</strong>re are enough resources<br />

to support <strong>the</strong> growing population. With a growing amount of people to feed and a finite amount of<br />

exploitable food sources, <strong>the</strong> agriculture industry is striving towards more efficient and ultimately more<br />

sustainable methods of food production. Sustainability as a concept is rooted in a social context, and as a<br />

term is loosely defined. There is no ma<strong>the</strong>matical equation to give <strong>the</strong> sustainability of any particular<br />

system because sustainability is dependent on multiple factors, many of which are ra<strong>the</strong>r subjective. There<br />

are two main categories discussed under <strong>the</strong> title of sustainability: critical limits and competing<br />

objectives. There exists a scientific procedure to determine <strong>the</strong> critical limit of earth to sustain human life.<br />

However, considering competing objectives is a multifaceted problem. This involves balancing <strong>the</strong><br />

resources available in a manner best suited to serve <strong>the</strong> human population for an amount of time deemed<br />

acceptable. For this method to work, items must be prioritized so that fair compromises can be made to<br />

ensure maximum desired output (Fricker, 2000).<br />

The sustainable agriculture movement embraces methods that are designed to maximize <strong>the</strong> food<br />

production in a given area while minimizing <strong>the</strong> environmental impact. Practices such as rotating crops,<br />

using less harmful chemicals, and recycling are all embraced under <strong>the</strong> sustainable movement. Ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

critical focus is <strong>the</strong> processing and transportation of goods. Processing consumes energy, and current<br />

transportation methods are fueled by depleting natural resources that also release harmful pollutants into<br />

<strong>the</strong> atmosphere. For example, milk production is an energy intensive process from raising <strong>the</strong> cows to<br />

transporting <strong>the</strong> milk. It is important to get as much milk per cow as possible in order to maximize profit<br />

and reduce environmental impact. Focusing on retrieving more milk per cow leads to better treatment of<br />

<strong>the</strong> cows and a more effective production process that is less wasteful. Dairy farmers are beginning to reuse<br />

water from <strong>the</strong> milk cooling process, harvest rainwater, and install boreholes in an effort to minimize<br />

water consumption. By increasing efficiency by 27%, dairy processors have prevented as much as<br />

270,000 tons of carbon dioxide from entering <strong>the</strong> atmosphere annually. This is a joint effort between <strong>the</strong><br />

processors and <strong>the</strong> retailers to use less energy and reduce emissions in <strong>the</strong> production and distribution<br />

process (Tasker, 2011).<br />

Unfortunately, helping <strong>the</strong> environment comes at a cost. Adhering to sustainable agriculture<br />

practices is difficult for many farmers who are struggling economically. Although sustainable practices<br />

are better in <strong>the</strong> long run, <strong>the</strong> operating costs can be impractical for some smaller farms. Additionally, <strong>the</strong><br />

cost of decreased output from using fewer chemicals is ultimately passed on to <strong>the</strong> consumer. Growing<br />

crops in a sustainable manner is better for <strong>the</strong> environment, but in some cases it may mean a decrease in<br />

volume. It all goes back to balancing <strong>the</strong> factors that contribute to sustainability. A decrease in output<br />

would mean increased competition that leads to increased prices for <strong>the</strong> consumer. However, <strong>the</strong>se initial<br />

challenges are insignificant when compared to <strong>the</strong> result once devastating irreversible environmental<br />

damage has occurred.<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!