11.07.2014 Views

Nonlinear dynamics induced by external optical injection in ...

Nonlinear dynamics induced by external optical injection in ...

Nonlinear dynamics induced by external optical injection in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> <strong>dynamics</strong> <strong>in</strong> semiconductor lasers 773<br />

Figure 5. Measured <strong>optical</strong> spectra of the conventional, edge-emitt<strong>in</strong>g semiconductor laser<br />

with J ˜ = 2 3 under <strong>optical</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> at a frequency offset ≈5.5 GHz: (a) weak <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> with<br />

regenerative amplification and four-wave mix<strong>in</strong>g sidebands; (b) enhanced subharmonic signal at<br />

ξ 2 = 2.1 × 10 −4 ;(c) subharmonic resonance at ξ 2 = 4 × 10 −4 ;(d) weak period quadrupl<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

ξ 2 = 2.6 × 10 −3 ;(e) period doubl<strong>in</strong>g at ξ 2 = 6 × 10 −3 and (f ) limit cycle at ξ 2 = 1.2 × 10 −2 .<br />

between the <strong>in</strong>jected signal and the central peak [11]. As the <strong>in</strong>jected signal is <strong>in</strong>creased, the<br />

spectral features near the relaxation resonance frequency narrow and <strong>in</strong>crease, figure 5(b)<br />

where the <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> level is ξ 2 = 2.1 × 10 −4 . Note, however, that these features are halfway<br />

between the <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> feature, or its oppositely shifted partner and the central peak. This<br />

frequency is slightly less than the relaxation resonance frequency of the free-runn<strong>in</strong>g laser.<br />

There is also a small frequency push<strong>in</strong>g of the central peak. At still higher <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> levels,<br />

figure 5(c) with ξ 2 = 4 × 10 −4 , the subharmonic resonance nature of the <strong>dynamics</strong> becomes<br />

clear. The sideband at the <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> frequency is now dom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>by</strong> the feature at half<br />

the offset. Also, the frequency push<strong>in</strong>g has stopped and the central peak is slightly pulled<br />

toward the <strong>in</strong>jected frequency [10]. As the <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> level is <strong>in</strong>creased to ξ 2 = 2.6 × 10 −3 ,<br />

figure 5(d), the push<strong>in</strong>g of the central peak and the dom<strong>in</strong>ance of the resonance frequency,<br />

now significantly larger than the <strong>in</strong>itial offset frequency, are re-established. This is actually<br />

a period-quadrupl<strong>in</strong>g spectrum, with weak, broadened features just discernible above the<br />

noise level <strong>in</strong> between some of the sharp spectral features. At higher <strong><strong>in</strong>jection</strong> levels the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!