Integrated Air Surveillance Concept of Operations - Joint Planning ...
Integrated Air Surveillance Concept of Operations - Joint Planning ...
Integrated Air Surveillance Concept of Operations - Joint Planning ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Surveillance</strong> <strong>Concept</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Operations</strong><br />
Normal <strong>Operations</strong> (Nominal <strong>Operations</strong>): When services, systems and functions—such as<br />
BSS—are available and/or operational and all services can be provided, depending upon the<br />
implementation segment. In the case <strong>of</strong> BSS, for example, this status also assumes that the<br />
interfacing systems providing the surveillance reports for Traffic Information Service-Broadcast<br />
(TIS-B) and weather and aeronautical data for Flight Information Service-Broadcast (FIS-B) are<br />
operational and providing that data. Otherwise, the TIS-B and FIS-B services would not be<br />
available. (7)<br />
Off-Nominal <strong>Operations</strong>: see Non-Normal <strong>Operations</strong><br />
Purpose: see Intent<br />
Required <strong>Surveillance</strong> Performance: a means <strong>of</strong> specifying surveillance quality necessary to<br />
support operational requirements. RSP is quantified by metrics that can vary by mission needs<br />
and airspace volumes. A national integrated surveillance service capability will nominally<br />
provide capability to satisfy the most demanding RSP for an airspace volume. The RSP concept<br />
describes a means <strong>of</strong> specifying surveillance quality necessary to support operational<br />
requirements.<br />
The surveillance service should monitor performance and include a means <strong>of</strong> reporting achieved<br />
surveillance performance to operators. The integrated surveillance service may achieve<br />
surveillance performance that might fall short <strong>of</strong> designed RSP due to system faults, atmospheric<br />
conditions, maintenance activities or other factors. Operator notification <strong>of</strong> achieved<br />
surveillance performance enables execution <strong>of</strong> contingency plans (such as fallback to reduced<br />
capability operations) and enables initiation <strong>of</strong> activities to repair or temporarily replace failed<br />
systems.<br />
The surveillance service should be planned to operate in degraded modes, which support<br />
operations that remain possible under a lower RSP. This situation enables design <strong>of</strong> a service<br />
where the cost <strong>of</strong> high service availability may be reduced in selected service volumes, while<br />
also enabling development <strong>of</strong> a system that will provide continuity <strong>of</strong> operations, retaining a<br />
usable surveillance capability in the event <strong>of</strong> equipment failure or other causes that disrupt<br />
availability.<br />
The following attributes <strong>of</strong> surveillance data elements and reports define RSP:<br />
Availability—likelihood <strong>of</strong> surveillance service for a specified volume;<br />
Update Period—time between position estimates;<br />
Detection Probability—likelihood <strong>of</strong> position data reports (by type <strong>of</strong> air vehicle);<br />
Continuity—probability <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> correlated reports;<br />
Integrity—independent determination <strong>of</strong> data veracity;<br />
Accuracy—precision <strong>of</strong> position or velocity; and<br />
Latency—data age when available for display or other use.<br />
(1) (2) (6) (8)<br />
November 2011 57