13.07.2014 Views

download (pdf, 11MB) - SNV

download (pdf, 11MB) - SNV

download (pdf, 11MB) - SNV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table - 6(b):<br />

Data On Production And Consumption Of Major Crops (In Muris)<br />

Variables Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum HHs<br />

Paddv : Production 34.04 23.07 0 90 97<br />

Consumption 34.31 15.71 9 82 100<br />

Surplus (0.27) 14.24 (36) 60 20<br />

Maize: Production 7.97 8.23 0 40 99<br />

Consumption 7.25 7.55 0 40 97<br />

Surplus 0.72 3.98 (5) 30 7<br />

Millet: Production 3.03 5.09 0 30 50<br />

Consumption 2.82 4.56 0 30 51<br />

Surplus 0.21 1.91 (3) 18 4<br />

Wheat: Production 2.35 3.27 0 15 54<br />

Consumption 2.16 2.96 0 14 53<br />

Surplus 0.19 1.2 (1.5) 10 4<br />

2,5.4 Livestock Ownership<br />

The sampled biogas owners owned a total of 571 livestock (buffaloes, cows and bulls excepts others such as<br />

goats pigs etc.) at an average of 5.71 cattle per household. There were no households without livestock. Tables<br />

7(a) and (b) provide the details.<br />

Table- 7 (a):<br />

Total Nos, Of Cattle Owned By Biogas Households<br />

Variable Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum<br />

Cattle 5.71 3,62 1 23<br />

Table- 7(b):<br />

Distribution Of Cattle Among The Households Under Study<br />

No. of Livestock * Total HHs Percentage<br />

0 0 0<br />

1 1 1<br />

2 11 11<br />

3 16 16<br />

4 19 10<br />

5 9 9<br />

& 16, 16<br />

7 6 6<br />

8 9 9<br />

9 2 2<br />

10 1 1<br />

11 4 4<br />

13 2 2<br />

14 1 1<br />

15 1 1<br />

19 1 1<br />

23 1 1<br />

Total 100 100<br />

*Cow, bull and buffalo only<br />

2.6 Educational Level<br />

The literacy level of the selected households was found to be 82% (excluding infants) during present study that<br />

was very much higher than the national average (39.6%). The male and female literacy rate, excluding the<br />

children of 1-6 years, of 1996 were calculated to be 95% and 70% respectively. Table - 8(a) and (b) show the<br />

educational status of the sampled households.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!