download (pdf, 11MB) - SNV

Table - 38 :
List of Plants Whose Gas Production Exceeded The Estimated Gas Production Based Upon
Dung Feeding
Plant
No.
2
4
7
11
25
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
56
58
59
61
62
63
64
66
67
69
77
83
85
86
93
Expected Gas Production Based
on Feeding (Cub. M)
2.00
1.40
2.00
1.40
0.74
0.80
0.80
1.20
1.00
0.60
1.60
1.00
1.00
0.80
1.20
1.00
1.00
1.64
1.00
2.30
1.20
2.00
0.60
0.60
1.00
0.84
1.44
Actual Gas Production Based on
Burning Hour (Cub. M)
2.40
1.60
2.30
1.60
0.80
1.27
1.00
1.33
1.33
1.07
1.80
1.93
1.93
1.00
1.87
1.60
1.40
1.73
1.33
2.60
1.67
2.20
0.80
0.93
1.20
1.20
1.47
Toilet Attached
To assess the usefulness of mixing device in inlet, efforts were made to compare the efficiency of
those plants with mixing device and plants without mixing device. The following table interprets the
result. It is worth noting that out of the 20 plants whose efficiency was observed to be more that 80%,
17 of them had mixing device.
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
NO
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Table - 39 :
Cross-Table Showing Relationship Of Plant Efficiency With Installation Of Mixing Device
Installation of mixing Plant Efficiency
Raw
device 80% total
Installed and v. good 0 2 4 3 7 16
Installed and good 2 9 12 5 8 36
Installed and fair 0 11 8 6 2 27
Installed and poor 0 1 0 0 0 1
Installed and v. poor 0 0 1 0 0 1
Not Installed 1 2 7 6 3 19
Column total 3 25 32 20 20 100
5.3 Users’ Perception
The respondents were encouraged to judge the performance of their plants by putting various direct
and indirect questions. Their responses and feelings were analyzed carefully to come to a conclusion
on whether the respective users; were satisfied with the outcome and impact of their plants. The
responses have been presented in the table below.
Table - 40 :
Response Of Users On Level Of Satisfaction
Level of Satisfaction
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
Not Satisfied
No. of Respondents
10
76
14