14.07.2014 Views

Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...

Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...

Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Fascist</strong> <strong>War</strong> <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong> 95<br />

committed “dur<strong>in</strong>g the present war.” The reply, doubtless to appear conciliatory,<br />

began with this “concession” and declared:<br />

The commission will no doubt be prepared to consider any <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

which the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Government or any other United Nations<br />

Government may wish to submit to it regard<strong>in</strong>g crimes committed aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

their nationals by our common enemies dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of the present<br />

war. It is not, however, the <strong>in</strong>tention to <strong>in</strong>vite Governments not hitherto<br />

associated with <strong>di</strong>scussions on war crimes, which have been proceed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for some time past, to serve on the Commission. 26<br />

The question of war crimes was meanwhile ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

attention. A Moscow Declaration, signed by Churchill, Ro o s evelt, and the Sov i e t<br />

leader Stal<strong>in</strong>, on 1 Nove m b e r, stated their determ<strong>in</strong>ation to pursue war crim<strong>in</strong>als<br />

“to the uttermost ends of the earth,” and to “deliver them to their accusers<br />

<strong>in</strong> order that justice may be done. ” 2 7<br />

A Further Parliamentary Question and M<strong>in</strong>i-<br />

Parliamentary Debate<br />

The question of <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s exclusion was aga<strong>in</strong> raised <strong>in</strong> the House of<br />

Commons on 3 Nove m b e r, when a Labour MP, Ben Riley, lobbied by Sylvia<br />

Pankhurst, put down a further Parliamentary Question. He asked the Fo re i g n<br />

S e c retary “whether <strong>Ethiopia</strong> is to be <strong>in</strong>cluded among the United Nations which<br />

h ave already been announced as a Commission to decide about the treatment of<br />

war crim<strong>in</strong>als.”<br />

The Government’s reply was given by another spokesman for Fo reign Affairs,<br />

R i c h a rd Law. Hop<strong>in</strong>g to slide out of the issue by referr<strong>in</strong>g to the previous day ’ s<br />

a n s we r, he replied: “I would refer the hon. Member to the written reply to the<br />

hon. Member for Shipley [i.e., Creech Jones] by my friend the Under-Secre t a r y. ”<br />

R i l ey, who had seen such Parliamentary evasion practiced prev i o u s l y, was not<br />

silenced. Revert<strong>in</strong>g to the ma<strong>in</strong> issue, <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s exclusion, he declared: “I have<br />

not seen the re p l y, but may I ask whether it is not a fact that all the Allied<br />

nations are entitled to be re p resented on that Commission except <strong>Ethiopia</strong>, and<br />

w hy is <strong>Ethiopia</strong> exc l u d e d ? ”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!