Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...
Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...
Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Fascist</strong> <strong>War</strong> <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong> 95<br />
committed “dur<strong>in</strong>g the present war.” The reply, doubtless to appear conciliatory,<br />
began with this “concession” and declared:<br />
The commission will no doubt be prepared to consider any <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
which the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Government or any other United Nations<br />
Government may wish to submit to it regard<strong>in</strong>g crimes committed aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
their nationals by our common enemies dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of the present<br />
war. It is not, however, the <strong>in</strong>tention to <strong>in</strong>vite Governments not hitherto<br />
associated with <strong>di</strong>scussions on war crimes, which have been proceed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for some time past, to serve on the Commission. 26<br />
The question of war crimes was meanwhile ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
attention. A Moscow Declaration, signed by Churchill, Ro o s evelt, and the Sov i e t<br />
leader Stal<strong>in</strong>, on 1 Nove m b e r, stated their determ<strong>in</strong>ation to pursue war crim<strong>in</strong>als<br />
“to the uttermost ends of the earth,” and to “deliver them to their accusers<br />
<strong>in</strong> order that justice may be done. ” 2 7<br />
A Further Parliamentary Question and M<strong>in</strong>i-<br />
Parliamentary Debate<br />
The question of <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s exclusion was aga<strong>in</strong> raised <strong>in</strong> the House of<br />
Commons on 3 Nove m b e r, when a Labour MP, Ben Riley, lobbied by Sylvia<br />
Pankhurst, put down a further Parliamentary Question. He asked the Fo re i g n<br />
S e c retary “whether <strong>Ethiopia</strong> is to be <strong>in</strong>cluded among the United Nations which<br />
h ave already been announced as a Commission to decide about the treatment of<br />
war crim<strong>in</strong>als.”<br />
The Government’s reply was given by another spokesman for Fo reign Affairs,<br />
R i c h a rd Law. Hop<strong>in</strong>g to slide out of the issue by referr<strong>in</strong>g to the previous day ’ s<br />
a n s we r, he replied: “I would refer the hon. Member to the written reply to the<br />
hon. Member for Shipley [i.e., Creech Jones] by my friend the Under-Secre t a r y. ”<br />
R i l ey, who had seen such Parliamentary evasion practiced prev i o u s l y, was not<br />
silenced. Revert<strong>in</strong>g to the ma<strong>in</strong> issue, <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s exclusion, he declared: “I have<br />
not seen the re p l y, but may I ask whether it is not a fact that all the Allied<br />
nations are entitled to be re p resented on that Commission except <strong>Ethiopia</strong>, and<br />
w hy is <strong>Ethiopia</strong> exc l u d e d ? ”