Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...
Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...
Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Fascist</strong> <strong>War</strong> <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong> 97<br />
questions are caus<strong>in</strong>g,” he demanded, “could we not have some clearer def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />
as to what exactly a war crim<strong>in</strong>al is and to what extent that should cover<br />
not only this campaign but others?”<br />
To these <strong>in</strong>terventions, the Government spokesman vouchsafed no re p l y. 2 8<br />
Foreign Office Reaction to Law’s Parliamentary<br />
“Inexactitudes”<br />
The above Parliamentary exchanges were carefully followed at the Foreign<br />
Office. Its officials, better <strong>in</strong>formed than MPs, were somewhat concerned about<br />
Law’s Parliamentary “<strong>in</strong>exactitude,” even though it furthered their overall<br />
object of stifl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>di</strong>scussion on the sensitive issue of <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s exclusion. They<br />
knew only too well that the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Government had not been “<strong>in</strong>formed”<br />
on the orig<strong>in</strong>al negotiations concern<strong>in</strong>g the commission, and that it was equally<br />
untrue that it had “offered no comment on them.”<br />
Allen, who had drafted Law’s bungled re p l y, was particularly peeved. On the<br />
f o l l ow<strong>in</strong>g day, he wrote a m<strong>in</strong>ute on “Mr Law’s supplementary assurance that<br />
the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Government we re <strong>in</strong>formed at the time negotiations for the establishment<br />
of the <strong>War</strong> <strong>Crimes</strong> Commission began and that they offered no comment<br />
on them,” and bluntly commented “I am afraid that this is not the case. ”<br />
Referr<strong>in</strong>g to his earlier m<strong>in</strong>ute, prepared for reply to Creech Jones, he<br />
recalled that it had, on the contrary, been “decided from the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g that our<br />
<strong>di</strong>scussions should be limited to the exiled European Governments, the three<br />
other major powers, and the Dom<strong>in</strong>ion Governments.” As for Law’s error, he<br />
added: “The <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Government were <strong>in</strong>formed <strong>in</strong> advance of the Loot<strong>in</strong>g<br />
declaration issued last December, but they have never been told anyth<strong>in</strong>g about<br />
the <strong>War</strong> <strong>Crimes</strong> Commission.”<br />
Allen’s statement was <strong>in</strong> itself bizarre. What he termed the “Loot<strong>in</strong>g declaration,”<br />
of December 1942, was the Allied declaration <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> Eden’s<br />
statement of 17 December 1942. It had scarcely any connection with “loot<strong>in</strong>g,”<br />
but merely enunciated the “solemn resolution of all freedom-lov<strong>in</strong>g peoples to<br />
overthrow the barbarous Hitler tyranny” <strong>in</strong> Europe, and to ensure that those<br />
responsible for “war crimes” should “not escape retribution.” 29 This declaration,<br />
which was allegedly brought to the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Government’s attention,<br />
was of no <strong>di</strong>rect relevance to <strong>Ethiopia</strong>, whereas the <strong>War</strong> <strong>Crimes</strong> Commission,