14.07.2014 Views

Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...

Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...

Italian Fascist War Crimes in Ethiopia - Societa italiana di storia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 Richard Pankhurst<br />

from which it was excluded, was crucially important, as far as the try<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>Italian</strong> war crim<strong>in</strong>als was concerned.<br />

Turn<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s cont<strong>in</strong>ued exclusion, Allen concluded, with some irritation,<br />

that the position would “presumably have to be expla<strong>in</strong>ed” to the newly<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>ted British M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>in</strong> Ad<strong>di</strong>s Ababa, Robert Howe. “A word,” he suggested,<br />

should also be said to the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n M<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>in</strong> London, Blatta Ayalä<br />

Gäbré, who (though this had been ignored <strong>in</strong> Mr Law’s reply) had “already<br />

asked for <strong>in</strong>formation about the Commission and the possibility of <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n<br />

representation upon it.”<br />

Allen was not alone <strong>in</strong> his <strong>di</strong>squiet about Law’s error. Another official,<br />

Frank Roberts, wrote <strong>in</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>ute the next day: “I do not know how Mr Law<br />

re c e i ved the impression that the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Government had ever been<br />

approached <strong>in</strong> this matter. It is of course not the case. . . .”<br />

The mystery was solved on the follow<strong>in</strong>g day. Gilbert MacKereth, an expert<br />

on <strong>Ethiopia</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Egyptian Department, confessed:<br />

I am sorry to say that the fault is entirely m<strong>in</strong>e, for Mr Law asked me on<br />

November 3rd. whether the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Govt. had been <strong>in</strong>formed about the<br />

commission and I told him that they had right at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, though<br />

not subsequently, and had raised no questions. I was labour<strong>in</strong>g, as was the<br />

<strong>Ethiopia</strong>n M<strong>in</strong>ister when he came to see me on the subject, under the misapprehension<br />

that the war crimes commission was an outcome of the<br />

loot<strong>in</strong>g declaration which had been communicated to the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n Govt.<br />

last December.<br />

Turn<strong>in</strong>g to the M<strong>in</strong>ister’s <strong>in</strong>quiry, to which Roberts had earlier referred, he<br />

recalled: “he <strong>di</strong>d not ask for representation on the commission, but for <strong>in</strong>formation.”<br />

He had not been <strong>in</strong>structed, but had seen perhaps <strong>in</strong> the Press about<br />

the formation of a commission.<br />

The above m<strong>in</strong>utes were duly seen by poor Law. That day, 5 November, he<br />

wrote a note of his own, <strong>in</strong> the relevant file. “I am sorry,” he declared, “And so<br />

is Mr MacKereth. I hope that between us we haven’t caused too much trouble.”<br />

30 Despite this apology, he took no steps to expla<strong>in</strong> his error to the House<br />

of Commons he had misled.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!