18.07.2014 Views

Schriever Wargame 2010 - Air Force Space Command

Schriever Wargame 2010 - Air Force Space Command

Schriever Wargame 2010 - Air Force Space Command

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

unintended consequences, it is critical to have considerable depth<br />

and analysis to this planning. The planning function needs to be<br />

resourced and undertaken, and then rules of engagement aligned<br />

with these plans.<br />

A related and similarly daunting challenge is that of attribution<br />

of interference or attacks on our space, and for that matter cyber,<br />

systems. Suffice to say that this challenge is understood and there<br />

is much to be done technologically and in planning in this area.<br />

In terms of achieving a vision of allied space assets, there is<br />

more work to be done on developing concepts for the prioritization<br />

of scarce assets in a contingency. Additionally, we need to<br />

consider how we might best fund joint space assets, as well as to<br />

maintain/replace such capabilities on an operationally responsive<br />

basis. The burden sharing of such costs and the programming of<br />

future commitments are fundamental considerations for a future<br />

alliance arrangement.<br />

Finally, there would be mutual advantage if we collaborate<br />

more not only on the use of our space assets, but also on our contingency<br />

arrangements in situations in which these assets are degraded<br />

or unavailable. As with all good planning, our partnership<br />

arrangements should cover the breadth of possibilities, so that we<br />

don’t simply fall into a state of disentanglement.<br />

<strong>Schriever</strong><br />

Rather than Australia participating as a standalone team, the<br />

overall structure of the wargame allowed allied team members to<br />

integrate with the cells that suited their specialization. Not only<br />

did this reinforce the future vision of allied partnerships in space,<br />

it was also highly rewarding as a training opportunity by allowing<br />

specialists to interact with others in their respective areas of<br />

expertise.<br />

The structure of the wargame was well developed, as it presented<br />

a good balance between broader considerations and the<br />

need to focus on space issues. The opportunities to highlight<br />

policy issues, and to start dealing with the ‘so what’ matters concurrent<br />

with the wargame, was a key advantage.<br />

A notable part of SW 10 was the experience, insights, and<br />

skills of the members of the executive cell and the various people<br />

who acted as mentors and advisors to the wargame. The Australian<br />

participants found interaction with these leaders and other<br />

SW 10 participants to be immensely rewarding.<br />

SW 10 facilitated interactions between the allies on various issues<br />

that helped the Australian participants consider real world issues.<br />

While there will continue to be national perspectives, there<br />

was common ground and the commonwealth nations operated<br />

well as a team.<br />

The wargame seemed to gravitate, to some extent, around the<br />

activities of the executive cell. Possibly this was in some part due<br />

to the wealth of experience and seniority present in that cell or the<br />

need for national strategic guidance in the scenarios. This left the<br />

role of the <strong>Space</strong> Council somewhat uncertain and underutilized<br />

at times, and there may be value for future wargames in considering<br />

the respective roles and membership of the executive cell and<br />

<strong>Space</strong> Council.<br />

In the absence of mature partnership arrangements for allied<br />

space and the underlying planning needed to support those arrangements,<br />

the national strategic level was pivotal and there was<br />

an assumption that allied policies would be resolved at this level.<br />

As mentioned previously, in order to keep up with the high tempo,<br />

we may need better clarity of policies and plans at the operational<br />

level, and focus more of the decision-making at that level.<br />

The only suggestion for improvement of an already well organized<br />

wargame therefore is to consider shifting the focus more<br />

onto the Joint <strong>Space</strong> Operations Center and CSpOC activities. To<br />

do so may require a substantial effort by all involved to develop<br />

the CSpOC framework between now and the next wargame, however<br />

such preparation would be rewarded.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The members of the Australian Defence <strong>Force</strong> and the broader<br />

Australian Defence Organisation appreciate the strength of our<br />

relationship with our allies. We also recognize the value of space<br />

capabilities to our mutual security and are beginning to understand<br />

that we cannot take them for granted.<br />

The experiences of the <strong>Schriever</strong> <strong>Wargame</strong> are very important<br />

as we continue to develop these capabilities. We look forward to<br />

the next wargame, while continuing the good liaison and evolution<br />

of our partnership.<br />

I would like to take the opportunity to thank General C. Robert<br />

Kehler and his team for making the allies so welcome, and for the<br />

efforts that go into the preparation of the wargame, which reflect<br />

the high level of professionalism that we consistently see from the<br />

US services and especially from <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> <strong>Space</strong> <strong>Command</strong>.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Cdre Andrew Dowse (BS,<br />

Electronic Engineering; Graduate<br />

Diploma, Legal Studies; MS; and<br />

PhD) joined the Royal Australian<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> as an engineer cadet in<br />

1981 and graduated as an electronics<br />

officer, working in areas of air<br />

defence and communications. In<br />

1989 he was posted to Tinker AFB,<br />

Oklahoma on exchange with the<br />

US <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> in the development<br />

of command and control systems.<br />

Subsequently he had postings as the<br />

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> Headquarters staff officer<br />

for communications systems and the senior engineer at 114 Mobile<br />

Control and Reporting Unit.<br />

Following completion of <strong>Command</strong> and Staff Course, Dowse<br />

served as the deputy director for information operations at Strategic<br />

<strong>Command</strong> Division before a posting in 1999 to the Australian<br />

Defence Staff Washington to liaise on aircraft systems, command,<br />

control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance,<br />

and reconnaissance and information operations matters. In 2002<br />

he was promoted to group captain and posted to be the director<br />

of information operations and electronic warfare in Defence Headquarters,<br />

followed by director of information technology services<br />

in the Defence Chief Information Officer Group. He was <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong><br />

director of enabling capability from 2006 to 2008.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Commodore Dowse was promoted and posted to his current<br />

role as director general integrated capability development in November<br />

2008. He will take on the role of director general capability<br />

and plans from November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Commodore Dowse is a graduate of the Australian Institute<br />

of Company Directors.<br />

21 High Frontier

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!