24.07.2014 Views

Boxoffice-Febuary.14.1948

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

i<br />

Decision of Supreme Court<br />

Expected About Mid-June<br />

(Continued from preceding pagei<br />

its only assets were used office furniture:<br />

that the company was open to any independent<br />

producer capable of producing good<br />

pictures and willing to risk his own money;<br />

that United Artists had no control over the<br />

way in which these producers want their<br />

pictures sold.<br />

One year United Artists had only four<br />

pictures, he said. Another year it had 2d,<br />

and it usually has from 12 to 15.<br />

"How can we put our pictures on the<br />

auction block?" he asked. "The hardest task<br />

I have had in this case has been to find the<br />

name of United Artists named in the government<br />

brief. Our only attempt to control<br />

admissions is to name the price the exhibitor<br />

wants to charge after 5 o'clock in<br />

individual<br />

contracts."<br />

PROSKAUER IS<br />

IMPRESSIVE<br />

Joseph M. Proskauer, for Warner Bros., was<br />

the last advocate at the Tuesday session. He<br />

has an easy command of English, a fund of<br />

quotations, and an interesting combination<br />

of humor, sarcasm, and emotional emphasis.<br />

His discussion fascinated the courtroom<br />

audience.<br />

"It was the molding of the form of relief<br />

decreed by the lower court that I want<br />

to discuss," he said.<br />

Warner Bros, own three per cent of the<br />

theatres, he said, and takes about eight per<br />

cent of the gross, and "that's not very remarkable."<br />

Warners' acquisition of theatres was "one<br />

of the great epics of the business," he declared.<br />

"It cost $25,000 to install soimd and<br />

no exhibitor was willing to risk it until<br />

Warner Bros, introduced it. It introduced<br />

a new form of competition. Warner Bros,<br />

owned 540 theatres in 1931. Today we have<br />

40 less, while the total of theatres has increased<br />

from 16,000 to 18.000.<br />

FOREIGN INCOME 30 PER CENT<br />

"Thirty per cent of our income is from<br />

foreign trade. "We make no money from<br />

the domestic business. Fourteen per cent of<br />

our income comes from om- own theatres.<br />

25 per cent from affiliated theatres and<br />

the rest from independents we are supposed<br />

to be grinding down. Our customers' prosperity<br />

has increased to a point unheard of<br />

in any other Industry. We cannot be convicted<br />

of collective monopolistic intent.<br />

There is nothing in this case to prove a<br />

purpose of monopoly."<br />

He said that the court's injunction that<br />

distributors would have to own 95 per cent<br />

of each of their theatres in order to retain<br />

them could not be carried out.<br />

Proskauer also argued for the privilege of<br />

block selling, becau.se its prohibition hurt independent<br />

theatres.<br />

THIRD DAY<br />

James F. Byrnes, former secretary of state,<br />

appearing as attorney for 20th Century-Fox,<br />

.said that his company accepted all the injunctions<br />

contained in the three-judge court<br />

decree, but tihat he wanted to object to the<br />

government's plea for divestiture of theatres.<br />

He insisted that the lower court did not rule<br />

that ownership of theatres led to restraint<br />

of trade.<br />

Then he brought up the arbitration system<br />

and quoted statistics of the handling of cases<br />

Before the Court<br />

Counsel for Government<br />

TOM C. CLARK, attorney general.<br />

ROBERT L. WRIGHT, assistant attorney<br />

general, prosecutor for the government.<br />

JOHN F. SONNETT, assistant attorney<br />

general.<br />

chief.<br />

Department of Justice antitrust<br />

Counsel for Industry<br />

JAMES F. BYRNES. 20th Century-Fox<br />

THOMAS TURNER COOKE, Universal<br />

JOHN W. DAVIS, Loew's, Inc.<br />

WILLIAM DONOVAN, RKO Radio<br />

LOUIS D. FROHLICH. Columbia<br />

JOSEPH M. PROSKAUER, Warners<br />

HnDWARD C. RAFTERY. United Artists<br />

WHITNEY NORTH SEYMOUR, Paramount<br />

For Amicus Curiae Petitions<br />

HERMAN LEVY, MPTOA-TOA<br />

ABRAM F. MYERS, Allied States<br />

For Appeal to Intervene<br />

THURMAN ARNOLD, American Theatres<br />

Ass'n<br />

COL. ROBERT JACKSON, and JOHN G.<br />

JACKSON, Confederacy of Southern<br />

Ass'ns<br />

by local arbitrators and the appeals board to<br />

.support his contention that the system had<br />

worked well.<br />

The lower court endorsed arbitration, but<br />

took the stand that it could only recommend<br />

it and not order it.<br />

Justice Frankfiuter interrupted Byrnes to<br />

ask if he took the position bhat the supreme<br />

court had power to order it.<br />

"Yes," replied Byrnes with emphasis. He<br />

quoted authorities to support his statement.<br />

In concluding his argument he said: "No<br />

one can reach the conclusion that the lower<br />

coiut was composed of three wise men."<br />

Assistant Attorney General Robert L.<br />

Wrig'ht began his rebuttal at 1:40 p. m. by<br />

saying: "I want to show wihat actually happened<br />

during the trial and to discuss the<br />

evidence."<br />

the ground that it had enjoined pools in<br />

numerous cities and should have etxended<br />

this injunction to Paramoimt partnersJiips.<br />

He asserted that these were pools in spite<br />

of the fact that the theatres are lofifilly<br />

operated, because, in his opinion, the partners<br />

are under the control of Paramount. Then<br />

he declared that the injunction procedure<br />

would not bind against future cooperation.<br />

His insistence on a ban against cross-licensing<br />

of pictures among the defendants, he<br />

said, was due to a conviction that this would<br />

restore healthy competition In exhibition and<br />

would stimulate production.<br />

Assistant Attorney General John Sonnett,<br />

who is in charge of the antitrust division of<br />

the justice department, confined himself to<br />

a factual recital of the conclusions of the<br />

three-judge court, and again pointed out that<br />

distributor-owned first runs get 45 per cent<br />

of the total film revenue.<br />

Exhibitor Attorneys<br />

To Create TOA Unit<br />

WASHINGTON—A legal advisory council<br />

for the TOA made up of attorneys connected<br />

with a number of regional units and their<br />

legislative agents has been formed for coordinating<br />

the activities of the organization.<br />

Several meetings will be held each year on<br />

call. Industry problems will be raised from<br />

the local level to the national level and vice<br />

versa. The new organization will be a central<br />

clearing house for information and advice.<br />

One of the primary objectives of the new<br />

group will be to create an open forum for<br />

the industry, a project that has been brought<br />

up from time to time during the past two<br />

years. The TOA board will discuss it later<br />

this month.<br />

Details of Ishe new setup were decided upon<br />

at a meeting held in Herman Levy's suite<br />

the Statler hotel on Tuesday, Februarj- 10.<br />

All of those present were in Washington for<br />

the purpose of listening to or participating<br />

in the antitrust case appeal arguments before<br />

the supreme court.<br />

Those present were: Tom Friday, Comerford<br />

circuit attorney; MamT Miller, coimsel<br />

for the TOA New Jersey unit; Lawrence E.<br />

Gordon and BjTon Pollard of the Butterfield<br />

circuit, Michigan; Albert Bernstein, counsel<br />

for the Wometco theatres; Col. Robert Barton,<br />

counsel for the Theatre Owners of Virginia;<br />

Sidney Grossman, MPTO of New York<br />

State; Col. Henry J, Spites, Kentucky Theatre<br />

Owners Ass'n; and PhUip Harland. attorney<br />

for the Fabian theatres.<br />

Large-Screen Tele Sale<br />

To Home User Is Worry<br />

(More Television News on Pages 12-13)<br />

NEW YORK—A new plan to market largescreen<br />

television equipment to clubs, schools,<br />

assembly halls, restaurants and large homes,<br />

in department stores and other retail outlets<br />

is causing concern in exhibitor circles.<br />

Ed Lachman, president of Allied Theatre<br />

Owners of New Jersey, sees this as a new<br />

form of competition to theatres, because it<br />

permits large numbers of potential filmgoers<br />

to find entertainment away from<br />

theatres.<br />

Lachman says the theory that television is<br />

not substantial competition because home<br />

receivers cannot accommodate large crowds<br />

SAYS LOWER COURT ERRED<br />

will not hold water if large-screen equipment<br />

is sold to nontheatrical outlete.<br />

He insisted that the lower court had erred<br />

in failing to order theatre divorcement on Colonial Television Corp. intends to market<br />

its mobile television projector and 7x9<br />

.screen to nontheatrical outlets in Los Angeles,<br />

Cleveland, Philadelphia and New York.<br />

During the week two New York department<br />

stores, A&S in Brooklyn and Bloomingdale's<br />

began selling the Colonial equipment.<br />

The standard retail price is $2,195.<br />

Rental Film Library Plan<br />

To Be Started by MPAA<br />

WASHINGTON—The motion picture industry<br />

for the first time in its history is<br />

making available to public libraries throughout<br />

the nation films which may be loaned<br />

like books to adult education groups, it was<br />

announced this week by Roger Albright, di- (<br />

rector of educational services of the Motion<br />

Picture Ass'n of America. On the library list<br />

is a total of 178 films, carefully selected. j<br />

in<br />

10<br />

BOXOFnCE :: February 14, 1948

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!