01.08.2014 Views

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

Post-enumeration Survey (PES) - Statistics South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Statistics</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

7<br />

2.3.1 Sampling process<br />

The ultimate purpose of the <strong>PES</strong> was to evaluate the quality of the census data by providing quantitative<br />

information on coverage and content errors. The evaluation focused on the nine (9) provinces in <strong>South</strong><br />

<strong>Africa</strong>, namely Western Cape (WC), Eastern Cape (EC), Northern Cape (NC), Free State (FS), KwaZulu-<br />

Natal (KZN), North West (NW), Gauteng (GP), Mpumalanga (MP) and Limpopo (LP). The initial sampling<br />

frame for the <strong>PES</strong> was the complete list of Census 2011 <strong>enumeration</strong> areas (EAs), amounting to<br />

103 576 EAs. However, this frame was reduced to 89 305 EAs after the exclusion of out-of-scope EAs<br />

which amounted to 14 271 EAs (13,8% of all the Census 2011 EAs). It was desired to have included the<br />

workers' hostels in the <strong>PES</strong> sample, but the current EA type classifications did not single out workers'<br />

hostels. Instead, all institutions, including workers' hostels, etc., were put together to form a type called<br />

'Collective Living Quarters'. Vacant EAs, parks and recreation, industrial, commercial and collective living<br />

quarters were excluded from the <strong>PES</strong> 2011 frame. The out-of-scope EA types are excluded due to the<br />

difficulty in tracking movers for matching purposes.<br />

The stratification and sampling process was designed to allow for the provision of estimates at national,<br />

provincial, urban and non-urban levels, but estimates will only be reliable at national and provincial<br />

levels.<br />

2.3.2 Stratification<br />

To improve the efficiency of the <strong>PES</strong> sample design, the sampling frame was divided into homogeneous<br />

strata. For this purpose, variables correlated with coverage error, such as geographic area, were<br />

chosen, since density and accessibility affect the quality of census coverage. In addition, geographic<br />

stratification is necessary to obtain separate estimates by domain of analysis. Therefore, the first level of<br />

stratification corresponded with the geographic domains of estimation defined; namely province and<br />

urban/non-urban zones of residence.<br />

For post-stratification, variables correlated with the extent of coverage, such as subdivisions that were<br />

well delimited and possessed a high degree of internal homogeneity with regard to socio-demographic<br />

characteristics were used. Hence, the sampling frame of EAs was implicitly stratified by geography type:<br />

urban formal, urban informal, tribal area, and rural formal.<br />

2.3.3 Sample size and allocation<br />

A sample of 600 EAs was selected from the total of 89 305 EAs from the Census 2011 EA frame and<br />

was allocated to the provinces based on the <strong>PES</strong> 2001 standard errors (SEs). The provincial samples<br />

were further allocated to strata using proportional allocation. International best practices recommend a<br />

sample size of 1% of the census EAs should be used for the <strong>PES</strong> in order to achieve acceptable<br />

precision levels. The budget allocated to the Census 2011 <strong>PES</strong> could only accommodate a maximum<br />

sample size of 600 EAs. The maximum SE level of 0,025 for the undercount rate was used in order to<br />

obtain a sample size of 600 EAs. This allowed for a reasonable 95% confidence level for the estimate of<br />

<strong>Post</strong> Enumeration <strong>Survey</strong> (<strong>PES</strong>)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!